Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Beneš Optát
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article examines Písničky čtyři evangelické…[Four Evangelical Canticles…], published in 1534 at Náměšť nad Oslavou. The author was most probably Beneš Optát, one of the translators of the New Testament into Czech (1533) and co-author of the first Czech grammar book (1533). These three printed works are presented here as the “Náměšť Biblica”. All of them were largely inspired by Erasmus of Rotterdam, his translation of the New Testament into Latin, his Annotationes and Paraphrases. The first part of the text comprises the contents of the printed work Písniček: Czech songs paraphrasing texts of Luke 1:46–55; Luke 1:68–79; Luke 2:14; Luke 2:29–32 and Matthew 1:1–17/18. The second part of the text analyses how Erasmus inspired the work of the philologists and Biblists at Náměšť. The third part presents an edition of one of the canticles, Simeon’s Canticle Nunc dimittis. The commentary stresses that the song came into being as a paraphrase of Erasmus’s prose paraphrase of the Gospel, as is demonstrated by the prominent motif of the swan song. Hence the hymn book does not only come within the context of Czech hymnography, but also within the history of the reception of biblical text and Erasmus-style Humanism in 16th century Bohemia and Moravia.
EN
In a Munich University library catalogue, Petr Voit has found that the second edition of the first grammar of Czech by Beneš Optát, Petr Gzel and Václav Philomath Grammatyka česká (1533), published in Nuremberg in 1543 is not missing, and that a unique (as far as we currently know) preserved copy can be found in this fonds under shelf no. 0014/W 8 Philol. 748#1. The aim of this study is to present previous reports on this second edition of the grammar in the literature (I), to describe the preserved Munich copy (II), to compare it with the first edition, and to indicate the options for interpreting and comparing with others, particularly the transcription of the Nuremberg edition in Gramatika česká by Jan Blahoslav (III). The conclusion summarizes the issue in several points and questions — relating to the prints under comparison and the difference between a) the phonology (historical grammar) in the 16th century printed texts; b) the orthography and typography in the 16th century printed texts; and c) the publishing technology appropriate for 16th century Czech texts. Not least, questions are formulated on the Grammatika česká manuscript (IV).
CS
Petr Voit zjistil v katalogu mnichovské univerzitní knihovny, že druhé vydání první mluvnice češtiny Beneše Optáta, Petra Gzela a Václava Philomatha Grammatyka česká (1533), vydané v Norimberku roku 1543, není nezvěstné a že pod signaturou 0014/W 8 Philol. 748#1 se v tomto fondu nachází její — pokud dnes víme — unikátně dochovaný exemplář. Cílem této studie je představit dosavadní zprávy o tomto druhém vydání mluvnice v literatuře (I), popsat dochovaný mnichovský exemplář (II) a srovnat ho s vydáním prvním a naznačit možnost výkladu a srovnání dalších, hlavně s opisem norimberské edice v Gramatice české Jana Blahoslava (III). Závěr shrnuje problematiku do několika bodů a otázek — týkají se kromě srovnávaných tisků diference mezi a) fonologií (historickou gramatikou) v tištěných textech 16. století; b) ortografií a typografií v tištěných textech 16. století; c) ediční techniky vhodné pro české texty z 16. století. V neposlední řadě jsou formulovány otázky týkající se rukopisu Grammatika česká (IV).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.