Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  CONTEXTUALIZATION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author divided the factors that have formed different home and foreign (mainly German) receptions of the work writen by a Hungarian writer and a Nobel Prize laureate Imre Kertész, into three circles. Since the author's prose work and his essays attend to Holocaust, the factor of the social context are related with the social processing of this problem, which in Hungary was conditioned by the fact that the topic was a taboo in the era of the socialist state and by extreme utterances after the dissolving of ideological obstructions from the end of the 1980s. The German reception of Kertész's work was helped by a lively social discussion on the problem, which perceived Holocaust along with historical also in the sociological and socially ethical consequences. The literary and historiographical factors of inappropriate home reception show particular asymmetry, which concerns a relatively high number of the literary critical echoes on particular works by the author and the lack, respectively the retardation of a literary historical treatment of his work. Deeper reception of analytical character in the Hungarian literary studies started to proceed after some time in consequence of a detachment of the studies from mimetic-aesthetic and ideologically conditioned horizons of the expectations. At present, the literary and artistic factors of the Kertész's work inspire various approaches of studying, which take into consideration the context of Jewish literature, discourse on Holocaust, social and psychological aspects, study the language of the interpretation and the destructivity of narration as an alternative to historical narratives on the problem.
EN
This article provides a historical analysis of intellectual and institutional development of the early American sociology. The two most frequent historical narratives, one of the 'intellectual irrelevance', and the other of the 'institutional triumph', examining the legacy of the first American sociologists are confronted and dissected in detail. It is argued that the reconstructions of early American tradition often project current problems into historically specific contexts of the formative period. The problem of continuity/discontinuity of American sociology is interpreted in terms of a historically conditioned 'quest for objectivity and coherence'. The design of the article is historical, theoretical, and conceptual. Its main intention is to identify the key problems put forward by the first American sociologists and to address their conceptions aimed at founding a unified theoretical and methodological approach. Detailed attention is also paid to the attempts at disciplinary separation and identity formation of the early American sociology.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.