Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 21

first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Code of Civil Procedure
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
EN
The bill contains an amendment of Article 50536 of the Code of Civil Procedure enabling the defendant to file an objection against a an order for payment issued in the course of electronic writ-of-payment proceedings. The reasons of procedural economy are justify introducing changes that make it possible to partially appeal from the EPU’s payment order. In the author’s opinion, the implementation of the reasons of the bill does not require addition of new paragraphs. In order to achieve the same result, it is enough to modify the indicated article in such a way that the acceptable scope of the appeal and the effects of raising the objection are set out in provisions concerning the “traditional” writ-of-payment proceedings
EN
In his position, the Sejm requested the Constitutional Tribunal to state that to the extent, in which provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure provide for a three-month period for filing complaint concerning the resumption of proceedings in case the judgment was based on a counterfeit or falsified document, and to the extent that the failure to meet this deadline results in the rejection of the complaint, conform to the Constitution. In the opinion of the Sejm, an allegation of a disproportionately short deadline is unjustified, as the deadline of three months to perform a specific procedural activity is one of the longest ones provided for in the Polish civil procedure and does not differ from the ones provided for in the civil procedural laws of other European countries. The practice of application by common courts of the provision in question also justifies the position indicating conformity to the Constitution.
EN
The article is devoted to a semantic analysis of the prohibition on executing a disposition which is imposed on a debtor who appears in an enforcement proceeding as a subject keeping an account of a debtor’s dematerialized securities. The author analyzes the Code of Civil Procedure and Trading in the Financial Instruments Act in order to identify the legal meaning of the word ‚disposition’. To this end, the author compares the obtained results with the meaning of the word in the vernacular, colloquial language andthe specific language used by brokers. Then, based on the findings, the author explains the functioning of the prohibition to execute a disposition in selected situations which may occur at that stage of the manner of enforcement. It has been found that the obliged entity follows the notification of seizure until the dispositions have been enforced. After that moment, for each disposition, a proper evaluation of the notification of seizure is not possible.
PL
The article is devoted to a semantic analysis of the prohibition on executing a disposition which is imposed on a debtor who appears in an enforcement proceeding as a subject keeping an account of a debtor’s dematerialized securities. The author analyzes the Code of Civil Procedure and Trading in the Financial Instruments Act in order to identify the legal meaning of the word ‚disposition’. To this end, the author compares the obtained results with the meaning of the word in the vernacular, colloquial language and the specific language used by brokers. Then, based on the findings, the author explains the functioning of the prohibition to execute a disposition in selected situations which may occur at that stage of the manner of enforcement. It has been found that the obliged entity follows the notification of seizure until the dispositions have been enforced. After that moment, for each disposition, a proper evaluation of the notification of seizure is not possible.
EN
The opinion presents Sejm’s draft position in the proceedings before the Constitutional Tribunal in relation to the constitutional complaint (ref. No. SK 28/12) concerning the Code of Civil Procedure. The author claims that the challenged Article 378 §1 of the Code, to the extent that it requires the court of second instance to take into account – by the operation of law – the nullity of legal proceedings resulting from improper authorization of an attorney only within the “scope of appeal”, is consistent with Article 45 (1) and Article 77(2) of the Constitution.
EN
In doctrine it is accepted that capacity to sue or be sued is a counterpart of contractual capacity, which means that a natural person has got capacity to sue or be sued in the same respect as it is equipped with contractual capacity. There are, however, persons who despite not having contractual capacity or having limited contractual capacity, have got capacity to sue or be sued. Establishing correlation between contractual capacity and capacity to sue or be sued requires considering the following: 1) whether the capacity to sue or be sued covers the contractual capacity or they are only interrelated, 2) whether it is possible to have capacity to sue or be sued without having contractual capacity, 3) whether a person not having contractual capacity or having it limited have the capacity to sue or be sued in civil proceedings and if it does whether it is full or limited. Presuming directly contractual capacity for capacity to sue or be sued is not in every respect correct. Since the Code of Civil Procedure does not designate persons having capacity to sue or be sued, it is necessary to refer in that respect to provisions of material law. The Code of Civil Procedure, however, gives exceptions to the rule according to which provisions of material law on contractual capacity prescribe the capacity to sue or be sued. However, some persons with limited contractual capacity (partially incapacitated or minors from articles 4531 and 573 of the Code of Civil Procedure) have full capacity to sue or be sued not only in cases deriving from legal activities that they are capable to perform but also in cases concerning their incapacitation as well as some cases of family and custody law. Exceptionally, it is possible for a person certified as being mentally unsound, thus a person without contractual capacity to perform procedural activities, but only in cases referring to its incapacitation (articles 559§3 and 560 of the Code of Civil Procedure). There is no express dependence between contractual capacity and capacity to sue or be sued. Therefore, capacity to sue or be sued cannot be said to be a counterpart of contractual capacity; nevertheless it can be said that they are strictly connected.
EN
According to the author of the proposed Sejm’s draft position the indicated provision, being the subject of the Warsaw District Court’s question of law, conforms to the Constitution. Court referendaries perform tasks related to legal protection, other than in administration of justice. In case of filling a complaint against a court referendary’s decision in enforcement proceedings, the court shall hear the case as a court of second instance, in accordance with the provisions on appeals. The complaint against the decision may be appealed only in cases, in which a court decision may be appealed. Proceeding complaints against bailiff’s activities does not constitute “a case” with the meaning of Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution. The legal norm, pursuant to which it is not possible to appeal against the court referendary’s decision on the complaint regarding bailiff’s activities, does not infringe the constitutional principle of procedural /justice.
EN
In the context of the presented bill there is a conflict of two socially and legally significant values. One of them is the rapidity of proceedings before the Supreme Court, while the other one is the need to ensure protection of the rights and interests of entities submitting cassation complaint, in case such rights and interests have been violated as a result of the appealed decision. The abolition of the institution of a pre-trial and the transfer of all cassation appeals to the substantive recognition by the Supreme Court will cause a significant increase in the number of pending civil cases and will also extend the average duration of proceedings before the Supreme Court. In order to implement the proposed regulations, the possibility of increasing the number of judges or judicial assistants in the Civil Chamber and the Chamber of Labor and Social Insurance should be considered.
EN
The petition submitted by a private person, concerning amendment of Article 777 of the Code of Civil Procedure in a way to prevent banks from issuing the so-called bank enforcement titles, raises concerns about the scope of amendment to legislation. The request indicated in the petition is particularly vital for borrowers who, before they had been granted a credit, signed a statement concerning submission to enforcement and borrowers regarding whom there are pending (or will be in future) executive proceedings. However, use of the right to security of claims by banks does not deprive the borrower form right to start counter-enforcement proceedings, from seeking protection of his rights in a court.
EN
The article addresses a relatively important – from both theoretical and practical point of view – issues of revised regulations concerning submission of a copy of a power of attorney and informational hearing the parties. The authors in the first part of the article are trying to identify the concerns and discuss issues relating to submission of a copy of a power of attorney. In the second part of this paper the authors discuss the issue of informational hearing the parties, indicating a number of doubts and fears, different views of doctrine and jurisprudence, and present their own view on this issue.
EN
The subject of the constitutional complaint are provisions of the Act – Code of Civil Procedure, applicable to cases concerning contacts with a child. The guardianship court orders the payment of a sum of money for the benefit of a person entitled to contact with the child when the person under whose care the child remains fails to fulfill the duties arising from the decision regarding contact with the child. In the Sejm’s position on the constitutional complaint, it was requested to find that this regulation does not conform to the Constitution to the extent in which a civil sanction is imposed on the parent having custody of the child when the breach of duties is a consequence of a negative attitude of the child caused by the person entitled to contact.
EN
In the Sejm’s position on the constitutional complaint it was stated that the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure Act are constitutional to the extent in which they make the appointment of an ex officio representative dependent on the determination by the court referendary or the court of the need for such an appointment, grant the court referendary the right to rule on the appointment of an ex officio representative, and to the extent in which they recognise the court examining the complaint against the decision of the court referendary as the court of second instance.
PL
The paper deals with problems connected with the premises conditioning the acceptance of a cessation appeal by the Supreme Court, in particular the interpretation and practical use of article 3989 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In the first place, a legal institution called a “przedsąd”, a first stage of the process of examining a cessation appeal by the Supreme Court, is briefly summarized. Subsequently, the author explains questions common to all the premises regulated by article 3989 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the connection between those premises and the grounds for a cessation appeal. Next, the author proceeds to interpret the premises governed by article 3989 of the Code of Civil Procedure and explains how they are put into practice. The last part of the paper contains the author’s conclusions: the premises are strongly connected with the public interest and the development of law; putting them into practice demands a lot of work, even from lawyers.
EN
The constitutional review was carried out on the limitation of grounds for lodging a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court. The applicant claims that the Supreme Court cannot verify the correctness or independently establish the facts on which the running of the limitation period depended. The Sejm applied to the Constitutional Tribunal for a finding that the provision of the Code of Civil Procedure in question conforms to the Constitution. In the opinion of the Sejm, the proceedings initiated by a cassation appeal do not constitute an instance control resulting in a full re-examination of the case. However, it is aimed at examining the legality of judgments issued by courts of second instance. The evaluation criteria are the so-called grounds of cassation indicated in the Code of Civil Procedure. The Sejm recognizes that in the given case it cannot be reasonably asserted that the constitutional guarantees related to the right to a fair procedure and to obtain a court judgment have been violated. The findings allow for the conclusion that the applicant did not refute the presumption of constitutionality of the regulation in question.
EN
The position of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland concerns Article 207 § 3 second sentence in conjunction with § 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP), establishing a procedure for consent by order of the president for bringing further writings preparatory to pleading in the course of the case, and Article 207 § 4 CCP which provides the possibility of an oral hearing of the parties in closed session before the first hearing, if the president call upon the parties to submit additional clarification on the issue, in terms of their compliance with Article 45 para. 1 of the Constitution, which establishes the right to a court hearing. In the author’s view, there should be declared compliance of the above provisions of the Act with the Constitution because in the challenged Article 207 § 4 CCP the lawmaker uses the plural to describe the addressee of the norm, so from this provision it follows an obligation to inform about the meeting and the possibility of participation of both parties, as well as entities acting as a party. Moreover, in support of the declaration of compliance of Article 207 § 3 the author presents the fundamental principles of civil process, such as the concentration of the evidence, judicial consideration of the case without undue delay, and the duty of the court and the parties to smoothly and timely completion of the proceedings. Motion has been made for cancellation of the case due to inadmissibility of the judgment on the basis of Art. 39 para. 1 subpara. 1 of the Constitutional Tribunal Act.
EN
In the author’s opinion, proposals regarding levelling rights of employees – other members of close family taking maternity leave (or parental one) – with rights of an employee – father raising a child, extending deadline for an employee to apply for correction of a work certificate, and applying to a labour court for correction of this document are justified. Significant doubts are related to introduction of the possibility of issuing by the court a decision replacing the certificate of employment. Finally, a positive opinion concerns the proposed amendment to Article 1050 of the Code of Civil Procedure, consisting introduction of the principle that enforcement of non-pecuniary benefits in the field of labour law, may be carried out before a court of an alternating jurisdiction, what will facilitate a lawyer submission of an application for such enforcement.
EN
The draft amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure and the Telecommunications Act concerns the introduction of the institution of the so-called John Doe lawsuit, which allows for the filing of a lawsuit without specifying the personal data of the defendant, in order to enable citizens to pursue civil claims for the protection of personal rights in the event of their infringement using the Internet. The introduction of this institution is to create a real possibility to pursue claims against persons who, taking advantage of the feeling of anonymity, commit infringements of personal rights using the Internet. The idea of the draft amendment deserves approval, but the bill needs to be modified.
PL
Celem artykułu jest omówienie problematyki dowodów uzyskanych sprzecznie z prawem w polskim postępowaniu cywilnym, z uwzględnieniem takich zagadnień, jak: definicja pojęć „dowód” i „dowód uzyskany sprzecznie z prawem”, konieczność rozstrzygnięcia konfliktu dóbr w związku z wykorzystaniem dowodu uzyskanego sprzecznie z prawem oraz poglądy judykatury dotyczące możliwości wykorzystania takich dowodów w procesie. Pomimo braku uregulowania tych kwestii w prawie cywilnym procesowym – Kodeksie postępowania cywilnego – polska doktryna procesu cywilnego ma znaczący dorobek naukowy związany z dowodami uzyskanymi sprzecznie z prawem. Niezależnie od teoretycznych rozważań dokonano przeglądu stanowisk prezentowanych w orzecznictwie polskich sądów powszechnych i Sądu Najwyższego na temat zakazu lub braku zakazu wykorzystywania tego rodzaju dowodów w procesie, na podstawie których można wysunąć wniosek, że nie istnieje jednolita linia orzecznicza opowiadająca się za całkowitym, częściowym lub brakiem zakazu wykorzystania dowodów uzyskanych sprzecznie z prawem w praktyce sądowej. W związku z powyższym należy stwierdzić, że nie jest możliwe przeprowadzenie precyzyjnego podziału pomiędzy dowodami uzyskanymi sprzecznie z prawem, które mogą lub nie mogą być wykorzystane w procesie, gdyż jest to kwestia podlegająca ocenie w każdym odrębnym stanie faktycznym przez sąd jako organ procesowy.
EN
The aim of the paper is to discuss the question of unlawfully obtained evidence in the Polish civil procedure taking into account such issues as the definition of the terms of “evidence” and “unlawfully obtained evidence”, the need to resolve a conflict of rights and interests in connection with the use of unlawfully obtained evidence and judicature’s views on the possibility of using such evidence in a trial. Despite the lack of regulation of these issues in the civil procedural law – the Code of Civil Procedure, the Polish doctrine of the civil procedure has significant scientific achievements related to the unlawfully obtained evidence. Regardless of any theoretical considerations, the paper exhibits a review of the positions presented in the jurisprudence of the Polish common courts and the Polish Supreme Court on the prohibition or non-prohibition of using such evidence in a trial, on the basis of which it can be concluded that there is no uniform line of jurisprudence in favor of complete prohibition, partial prohibition or non-prohibition of using unlawfully obtained evidence in judicial practice. In view of the above, it was found that it is not possible to make a precise division of unlawfully obtained evidence into evidence that may or may not be used in a trial as each separate factual state needs to be assessed by the court as a procedural authority
18
51%
EN
The article analyzes real estate execution with particular emphasis on the arguments for restoring the regulation of post-litigation institutions in the Civil Procedure Code of 1930. The purpose of the study was to show that a return to these regulations would eliminate informal agreements between bidders and give the potential buyer more time to take decision to purchase real estate. The article also attempts to show that compliance with the postulates by the legislator in this respect would allow obtaining a higher price for the real estate being the subject of the auction.
PL
W artykule analizie poddano skutki wydania postanowienia o przybiciu w toku egzekucji z nieruchomości ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem argumentacji za przywróceniem regulacji dotyczących instytucji nadlicytacji obowiązujących w Kodeksie postępowania cywilnego z 1930 r. Cel badania stanowiło wykazanie, że powrót do tych regulacji wyeliminowałby zawieranie nieformalnych porozumień pomiędzy licytantami oraz dałoby potencjalnemu nabywcy więcej czasu na podjęcie decyzji o nabyciu nieruchomości. W artykule podjęto również próbę wykazania, że spełnienie postulatów de lege ferenda przez ustawodawcę w tym zakresie pozwoliłby na uzyskiwanie wyższej ceny za nieruchomość, będącą przedmiotem przetargu.
EN
Watching over the quality education in Poland is at the heart of Polish Accreditation Committe’s purview of activity. The Committee accounts for the organizational structure of European accrediting institutions. Its activity is independent, and it doesn’t come under any national supervisory body. By assessing the education quality as well as issuing opinions about academic institutions, the committee activity pertains exclusively to this community. Committee decisions have got the incontrovertible character and are anchored in two principles: objectivity and impartiality. Polish Accreditation Committee is not an administrative body, and its activities are not subjected to the Code of Administrative Proceedings. However, for the sake of objectivity and impartiality in the work of the Committee, the Code of Administrative Proceedings should be applied in order to exclude a Committee member. Situations that necessitate such an exclusion are: employment of a Commit tee member at a supervised university, nepotic character of an employment, appointment of a Committee member as an expert – preventing the duality of roles (if performed at the same time as an expert and a member of the Committee), and the need for reshuffling while re-examination of a case related to the Committee assessment. The Committee chairman decides the committee member’s exclusion, but such an action is not an administrative act.
PL
Nad systemem jakości kształcenia w szkolnictwie wyższym czuwa Polska Komisja Akredytacyjna. Wpisuje się w strukturę organizacyjną europejskich instytucji akredytacyjnych. Jest niezależna w swoim działaniu, nie podlega nadzorowi organów państwowych. Ma charakter środowiskowy. Wydaje opinie i oceny dotyczące jakości kształcenia w szkołach wyższych, a jej uchwały mają charakter niepodważalny. Działalność Komisji zakotwiczona jest w dwóch zasadach: obiektywizmu i bezstronności. Polska Komisja Akredytacyjna nie jest organem administracyjnym, a jej czynności nie podlegają przepisom Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego. Jednakże dla zachowania obiektywizmu i bezstronności w pracach Komisji, Kodeks postępowania administracyjnego ma zastosowanie w odniesieniu do wyłączenia członka (członków) Komisji. Sytuacje, które wymuszają takie wyłączenie to: zatrudnienie w kontrolowanej uczelni samego członka Komisji, zatrudnienie osoby pozostającej z nim w określonym stosunku bliskości, powołanie członka Komisji w charakterze eksperta, wykluczenie dualizmu ról procesowych (jednoczesne występowanie w roli eksperta i członka Komisji) oraz konieczność zmiany składu osobowego przy ponownym rozpatrzeniu sprawy dotyczącej oceny Komisji. O wyłączeniu członka Komisji postanawia jej przewodniczący, którego czynność w tym zakresie jest odformalizowana i nie stanowi aktu administracyjnego.
Pieniądze i Więź
|
2014
|
vol. 17
|
issue 3(64)
168-177
PL
W artykule przeprowadzono wykładnię polskiej regulacji zdatności arbitrażowej w art. 1157 k.p.c., określającej zakres sporów, które mogą być poddane przez strony pod rozstrzygnięcie sądu polubownego. Dokonano tu kompleksowej analizy prawa polskiego wraz z prezentacją historii procesu legislacyjnego Części piątej Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego „Sąd polubowny (arbitrażowy)” uchwalonej w 2005r. Ponadto przeprowadzono analizy i klasyfikacje obcych regulacji prawnych, które są tożsame z polską instytucją zdatności arbitrażowej (ang. arbitrability, niem. Schied.Ohigkeit, franc. arbitrabilite). De lege lata wskazano, iż art. 1157 k.p.c. sformułowany jest niejasno i wadliwie a przez to jest źródłem licznych ryzyk prawnych. Przy ocenie zdatności arbitrażowej należy stosować przesłankę zdatności ugodowej sporu w sposób abstrakcyjny a nie konkretnie indywidualny. De lege ferenda wskazano na potrzebę jak najszybszej zmiany ustawowego kryterium zdatności arbitrażowej. Znowelizowany art. 1157 k.p.c. otrzymałby następujące brzmienie: „Strony mogą poddać pod rozstrzygnięcie sądu polubownego spory o prawa majątkowe lub spory o prawa niemajątkowe, mogące być przedmiotem ugody sądowej, z wyjątkiem spraw o alimenty”.
EN
The article presents the interpretation of the Polish regulation of arbitrability described by the Art. 1157 of the Civil Procedure Code (CCP) which defines the scope of disputes that may be settled by arbitrary court. A comprehensive analysis of the Polish law was carried out with the presentation of the history of the legislative process of the fifth part of the Code of Civil Procedure "arbitration court" enacted in 2005. Moreover, the analysis and classification of foreign regulations which are synonymous with the Polish institution of arbitrability were made. De lege lata, it was indicated that the Article 1157 of the CCP was formulated in an unclear way and therefore it is the source of numerous legal risks. When assessing the arbitrability of a dispute abstract conciliatory capability should be applied instead of individual conciliatory capability. De lege ferenda, the urgent need to change the legal definition of arbitrability was pointed out. The revised Art. 1157 CCP would receive the following wording: "The parties may submit for settlement by arbitrary courts disputes concerning property rights or non-property rights disputes, which may be the subject of a judicial settlement, with the exception of alimony."
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.