Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: Defense

Sort By:

Limit search:

Natural Nonbelief as a Necessary Means to a Life of Choiceworthy Meaning

100%

Vandergriff K.

Open Theology

2016

vol. 2

issue 1

Many have thought that certain types and distributions of apparent nonresistant nonbelief in the world are among the best reasons to think naturalism is more probable than theism. Jason Marsh has argued that one specific type of nonresistant nonbelief, called natural nonbelief in early humans, supports naturalism over theism. However, I will argue that it is epistemically possible that God has a morallysufficient reason for permitting natural nonbelief in early humans. First, according to Axiarchism, God’s goal for physical reality is to intentionally structure it so that a choiceworthy degree of moral, intellectual, and aesthetic value will be realized. Second, since theism entails Axiarchism, and it is far from clear on our total available evidence that eliminating the possibility of natural nonbelief would have led to a choiceworthy degree of moral, intellectual, and aesthetic value being realized for early humans, the degree to which natural nonbelief supports naturalism over theism is softened.

Quad–Australia. Nowe otwarcie

61%

Zdziech D.

Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe

2018

issue 4

221-239

Ten years after the collapse of the first version of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QSD), the new „Quad” is growing, with the participation of the same counties: Australia, India, Japan and the United States. Why after the fall of the idea did they return to this platform again? The answer seems to be obvious, not only for those who wanted to maintain the „Quad” but also for those who did not treat it as a priority. The growing strength and assertiveness of China convinced these four states to launch the new „Quad”. For Australia, the key factor for the effectiveness of the new Quadrilateral Security Dialogue will be to deepen mutual cooperation with special emphasis on India, as well as to convince ASEAN countries to the idea of the Indo-Pacific. Only in this way „Quad” would guarantee security in the region, as much as to create an alternative to the China’s Belt and Road project. It is Australian chance to balance the power, through bringing order to the region, on principles that are favorable for itself.

Dziesięć lat po upadku pierwszej wersji Czterostronnego Dialogu Bezpieczeństwa, rozwija się nowy „Quad” z udziałem tych samych państw: Australii, Japonii, Stanów Zjednoczonych oraz Indii. Dlaczego powrócono do tej idei raz jeszcze? Odpowiedź wydaje się oczywista nie tylko dla tych, którzy chcieli utrzymania dialogu, ale także dla wszystkich, którzy nie traktowali go priorytetowo. Rosnąca siła i asertywność Chin przekonała „czwórkę” do ponownego otwarcia „Quad”. Dla Australii kluczem do skuteczności nowego Czterostronnego Dialogu nBezpieczeństwa będzie pogłębienie wzajemnej współpracy, ze szczególnym naciskiem na Indie oraz przekonanie państw ASEAN do wizji Indo-Pacyfiku. Tylko w ten sposób „Quad” może stać się gwarantem bezpieczeństwa w regionie, jak również tworzyć alternatywę dla chińskiego projektu Pasa i Szlaku. To szansa Australii na korzystne zrównoważenie sił przez doprowadzenie do porządku w regionie, na korzystnych dla siebie warunkach.

Refine search results

1 Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe

1 Open Theology

1 2018

1 2016

1 Vandergriff K.

1 Zdziech D.

Search results

Natural Nonbelief as a Necessary Means to a Life of Choiceworthy Meaning

Quad–Australia. Nowe otwarcie