Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Deregulation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

(De-) Regulating the Creative Economy

100%
Neuwirth R.
Creative and Knowledge Society
|
2011
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
44-62
EN
Drastic changes have occurred throughout the past century and the world community is struggling to find the exact concepts to describe, understand and, possibly, govern them. One of the concepts used to describe these changes is the so-called "creative economy". Even though the concept is becoming more frequently used, it lacks a precise definition and its meaning remains elusive. Moreover, the proliferation of related concepts, such as the "experience economy", the "cultural economy", the "knowledge-based economy" and the "creative and cultural industries", further obscures its precise scope and meaning. These concepts are, however, no less elusive, particularly because they are of a dual or oxymoronic character, which variably combines aspects of culture, creativity and intellectual creation on the one hand with those of the economy, business, trade and commerce on the other.In sum, the conceptual uncertainties also translate into major difficulties in finding appropriate regulatory responses in the sphere of law. The aim of the present article is therefore to cast light on the meaning of the concept of the creative economy with a view to paving the way for its better and more efficient regulation in the legal sphere. To this end, the first part offers a comprehensive interpretative analysis of the "creative economy" with a view to establishing its value to the present global governance debate. Based on the evidence that designates the creative economy as an evolving concept requiring a multidisciplinary model for the formulation of an adequate approach in law- and policymaking, the second part discusses some of the creative economy's major implications in the sphere of law. In this regard, several regulatory examples appear to advocate the abandonment of the conventional in favour of a more holistic method of regulation. The article concludes with some recommendations that are deemed useful for further debate and research in this area, which ultimately may contribute to the formulation of the kind of creative laws that are needed for the successful regulation of the creative economy in the future.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Regulacja i deregulacja rynku pracy w Polsce a wzrost gospodarczy

67%
Nowak-Lewandowska R.
Studia Ekonomiczne
|
2015
|
vol. 213
185-196
PL
Efektywne wykorzystanie zasobów ludzkich stanowi jeden z głównych czynników wzrostu gospodarczego. Aby zapewnić i utrzymać trwały wzrost gospodar¬czy, konieczne jest podjęcie działań w kierunku większej aktywizacji zasobów pracy, jak i uelastycznienia rynku pracy (poprzez deregulację), przy zachowaniu bezpieczeństwa socjalnego (w drodze regulacji). Celem artykułu jest zaprezentowanie wybranych działań państwa w zakresie regu¬lacji i deregulacji rynku pracy w Polsce oraz ich roli w kontekście wzrostu gospodarczego. Autorka zwraca szczególną uwagę na proces uelastycznienia rynku pracy oraz aktywizacji osób starszych.
EN
Effective management of human resources is one of the main factors of the economic growth. To ensure sustainable economic growth, it is necessary to take action towards the greater activation of labour resources, greater labour market flexibility, with the protection of the social security. The aim of this article is to present selected activities of the State in the field of re¬gulation and deregulation of the labour market in Poland in the context of economic growth. The author accents the problem of labour market flexibility and the activation of elderly people.
3

The Domestic Sources of Global Adhocracy

51%
Etzioni A.
Social Change Review
|
2012
|
vol. 10
|
issue 2
99-124
EN
The article shows that (a) those who expect new global powers to rise, provoking a clash with the old one seeking to maintain its supremacy (the US), are mistaken. The US will scale back its international role, but no other power will step in to take over its functions in maintaining order. Hence an increase in global disorder. The gap will be filled to some extent by ad hoc coalitions in what is here called ‘the rise of adhocracy’. (b) The reason that various powers will play a more limited international role is that they all suffer from the same domestic crisis, namely, a governing deficit due to a decline in competence and legitimacy - albeit one that takes different forms in different nations.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.