Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Dobrobyt gospodarczy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
W artkule przeprowadzono analizę porównawczą dobrobytu ekonomicznego gospodarstw domowych wyróżnionych ze względu na wiek głowy gospodarstwa domowego. Analizę tę przeprowadzono wyznaczając uogólnione krzywe Lorenza oraz skrócone funkcje dobrobytu. Najmniejszym dobrobytem cechowały się gospodarstwa domowe 60+. Grupa ta nie jest jednak jednorodna ze względu na osiągany dobrobyt - zdecydowanie gorszym dobrobytem cechują się gospodarstwa domowe, których głową jest kobieta.
EN
In this article there was conducted comparative analysis of welfare of households divided into groups according to the age of household's head. The analysis was conducted using generalized Lorenz curves and abbreviated welfare functions. Households 60+ were characterized by the smallest welfare. This group is not homogenous due to achieved welfare - definitely worse welfare is in female-headed households than in male-headed households.
EN
The aim of this study is evaluation of poverty range in southern macroregion and formulate conclusions for the form of the studied phenomenon in the coming years. The paper presents a deep analysis, involving on the one hand poverty itself, on the other hand taking into the consideration the situation opposite to poverty - welfare. The income inequality, which is de facto the basis of defining poverty, was also taken into the consideration. The values of selected indicators calculated for southern macroregion was also compared with the values of indicators calculated for Poland.
EN
The paper aims to highlight the microeconomic aspects of the Swedish model. Although one may easily find many characteristic examples of behavior or structures on micro level, we claim that there were three crucial cases. First, it was the widespread expectation for paternalistic behavior of the government that originated long before the model was implemented. Second, the emergence and successes of particular interest groups (especially the trade unions). And third, the system relied heavily on large enterprises which were expected to achieve high growth and to be the middleman for executing egalitarian policies. It is hard to expect that the Swedish model would be such a success if it weren't for these microeconomic features.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.