Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  EPISTEMIC NORMATIVITY
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

LAUDAN, INTUITION AND NORMATIVE NATURALISM

100%
Sankey H.
Organon F. medzinárodný časopis pre analytickú filozofiu
|
2020
|
vol. 27
|
issue 4
437 – 445
EN
The aim of this paper is to document Laudan’s rejection of the appeal to intuition in the context of his development of normative naturalism. At one point in the development of his methodological thinking, Laudan appealed to pre-analytic intuitions, which might be employed to identify episodes in the history of science against which theories of scientific methodology are to be tested. However, Laudan came to reject this appeal to intuitions, and rejected this entire approach to the evaluation of a theory of method. This is an important stage in the development of his normative naturalist meta-methodology.
2

NATURALIZMUS A SKEPTICIZMUS

88%
Szapuová M., Nuhlíček M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2020
|
vol. 75
|
issue 9
760 – 775
EN
The problem of scepticism is one of the central problems in traditional epistemology which has its place also in contemporary analytically oriented epistemology. However, from the point of view of naturalized epistemology, scepticism is shifting to the periphery of interest. The subject of the paper is the relationship between scepticism and naturalism, which in contemporary epistemology are understood as opposing positions. Attention is focused on the critique of philosophical scepticism from the naturalistic perspective, as well as on the critique of the naturalistic reaction to scepticism from anti naturalist positions. The aim of the study is to clarify the main points of the dispute between the traditional approach and the naturalistic approach to knowledge inspired by Quine, with special regard to the problem of scepticism. The intention is to demonstrate that the dispute between traditional and naturalistic epistemology is not primarily concerned with scepticism, but it is a meta-epistemological dispute concerning the nature or the very possibility and legitimacy of epistemology as a philosophical study in which the issue of epistemic normativity plays a central role.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.