Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Eastern Church
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2013
|
vol. 24
|
issue 18
123-150
EN
Marriage agreement, which is the cause of marriage itself, expressed by betrothed at the moment of contracting it, is not only the act coming from natural law or entirely the sacramental act, but also, due to its particular character both religious and social, it is the act of law that causes concrete, serious consequences. That is the reason why marriage agreement is put under many legal regulations, which precisely define the canonical form of marriage contraction. The issue of canonical form of marriage contraction is still being disputed very intensely by canonists, concerning doctrinal aspects as well as practical side of this problem. Most of existing in this area problems, are related to Church rights and powers in this field, on the one hand, and state power over the institution of marriage, on the other hand; as well as to prerogatives owned by many churches or religions concerning this subject. Particularly difficult matter is validity of marriages, contracted according to norms of different legislation than its own or contracted in rite different than own Church sui iuris. That is the reason, why undertaking a legal reflection over the norms concerning canonical form of marriage contraction, which occur in canons 828-842 of Codex canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium, seems to be interesting. The first part of this stadium composes the short historical outline of developing the form of ecclesiastical marriage contraction, both on the East and West. Yet in this part, the sense of East tradition for mystical and spiritual aspects of marriage, is clearly pointed out, which will later affect boldly on current legal regulations in East Catholic Churches. It is even visible in the first canon, article six, where role and meaning of so called ritus sacer is outlined, at the time of contracting a marriage. In the Latin Church, the sacrament of marriage essence is identical with its substance, in different words with its sacramental sign. And that is the reason why expressing the marriage agreement proclaimed by its sides, is the sacrament of marriage essence. According to this, the priest is only an official witness of the marriage contraction. In the East- tradition Churches, that issue is different from our way of thinking. The priest himself is the one, who, in the name of God, grants the sacrament to the betrothed and then blesses the marriage contracted that way. Based on this elementary difference in understanding relevant part of canonical marriage form, east legislation adjusts the issue concerning normal minister of marriage as well as the extraordinary one; matters regarding delegation of the power needed for giving blessings to those who are married; things referring to dispensation from canonical form of marriage contraction; norms concerning the form of celebrating this sacrament in special ways or rite in which that celebration is being performed. All these regulations, that have been talked in details hereby, serve a purpose to protect the institution of marriage, which is the basic cell of social organization and also to stress the sacramental character of marriage, contracted between those who were baptized.
Polonia Sacra
|
2018
|
vol. 22
|
issue 2(51)
159-174
PL
Jedną z ważniejszych przestrzeni dialogu ekumenicznego między Kościołami Wschodu i Zachodu jest monastycyzm. Mimo wspólnych korzeni jego formy i znaczenie w Kościele różnią się na Wschodzie i Zachodzie. Różnice te dotyczą w większości roli przełożonego, instytucjonalnych aspektów życia i relacji z władzami kościelnymi. Stała wymiana tekstów i inspiracji zawsze była świadectwem nieustannego dialogu między dwiema tradycjami tego samego stylu życia. Dzisiaj wspólne wartości, współdzielone przez mnichów wschodnich i zachodnich, takie jak „duchowe ojcostwo”, kultura i wychowanie, mogą okazać się pomocne nie tylko w dialogu ekumenicznym, lecz i w procesie ewangelizacji.
EN
One of the important platforms of the ecumenical dialogue between Eastern and Western Churches is monasticism. Despite common roots, its forms and meaning in the Church is different in the West and in the East. These differences concern mostly the role of superior, the institutional aspects of life and reference to the Church authorities. The constant exchange of texts and inspirations has always been a sign of permanent dialogue between two traditions of the same style of life. Today, the common values shared by the monks both in the West and the East, such like “spiritual fatherhood”, culture and education may become helpful not only for the ecumenical dialogue but also in the process of evangelization.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2016
|
vol. 27
|
issue 2
5-19
EN
The circumstances of promulgating in 1983 by John Paul II of the new Canon Law shaped in the spirit of science and the guidelines of the Second Vatican Council, which was raising interest of canonist, prompted deeper studies over its norms, also in the sphere of marital law. Marital law has been amended and modifies since the Code of 1917, which was clear from the post-Council law and intense work of the Papal Commission on Revision of CIC.In that period of time several comprehensive manuals and commentaries appeared (in Polish) to the marital law included in CIC by: T. Pawluk, E. Sztafranowski, W. Góralski, J. Krukowski, M. Żurowski, P. Gajda and P. Majer.The authors of the manuals and commentaries to the marital law included in CCEO are W. Góralski and K. Nitkiewicz.
Ius Matrimoniale
|
2016
|
vol. 27
|
issue 1
5-23
EN
Although marital law was attracting particular attention of the doctrine from the very beginning of its creation (as a field of science), only the promulgation of codes of canon law (CIC 1917, CIC 1983, CCEO 1990) “liberated” the natural need of issuing manuals and commentaries regarding marital law.The subject of the first part of the paper are the manuals and commentaries in Polish regarding the entire marital law (substantive), from before 1917 and then those issued after 1917 – before the Second Vatican Council and after the Council.The author discusses particular manuals and commentaries in chronological order and provides their evaluation.In that period of time several comprehensive manuals and commentaries appeared (in Polish) to the marital law included in CIC by: J. Pycia, F. Bączkowicz, J. Baron, W. Stawinoga, B. Wilanowski, W. Szmyd, S. Biskupski, W. Szafrański, M. Żurowski. E. Sztafrowski.
Vox Patrum
|
1985
|
vol. 8
321-343
EN
translation
PL
tłumaczenie
EN
The author of the article discusses the role of the tradition of St. Cyril and Methodius and the reception of this idea in East-Central European culture. Special emphasis was put on presenting the story of the Slavic Rite and its significance, particularly to Eastern Slavs. Later on in the article the author turns his attention to the heritage of St. Cyril and Methodius’s ideas in the works of thinkers from the Hussite circles as well as those from the Roman milieu of Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini. Next, the focus is shifted to the involvement of Jesuits in reviving the Cyril-Methodius tradition, of which so far little is known in historiography. Despite the fact that the origin of this revival was Olomouc, the ideas were also alive in the formed Republic of Poland. In the second half of the 19th century Velehrad became the symbolic place of worship of St. Cyril and St. Methodius. The place became an important centre of Slavic ecumenical movement. Regular conventions and celebrations in Velehrad attracted active figures involved in the national movement both from Moravia, Bohemia and Slovakia as well as other Slavic countries, including Poland. The ministerial work of Jesuits in the town concentrated on the application of the heritage of St. Cyril and Methodius to carry out evangelization and defend Christian values in the world.
PL
Autor artykułu omawia znaczenie cyrylo-metodiańskiej tradycji i recepcji tej idei w kulturze Europy Środkowo-wschodniej. Szczególny nacisk został położony na ukazanie historii rytu słowiańskiego i jego znaczeniu szczególnie dla wschodnich Słowian. W dalszej części autor zwrócił uwagę na dziedzictwo myśli Cyryla i Metodego w pismach myślicieli z kręgu husyckiego a także związanego ze środowiskiem rzymskim Eneasza Sylwiusza Piccolominiego. Następnie skupił swą uwagę na, mało znane do tej pory w historiografii, zaangażowanie w odrodzenie tradycji cyrylo-metodiańskiej członków zakonu Jezuitów. Pomimo tego, że ośrodkiem tego odrodzenia był Ołomuniec idee te były żywe również na ziemiach dawnej Rzeczypospolitej. W 2. połowie XIX w. na symboliczne miejsce kultu Cyryla i Metodego wyrósł Velehrad. Miejsce to stało się ważnym ośrodkiem słowiańskiego ruchu ekumenicznego. Cyklicznie zjazdy i uroczystości religijne w Velehradzie przyciągały aktywne postaci zaangażowane w ruch narodowy zarówno z Moraw, Czech i Słowacji, ale również z pozostałych krajów słowiańskich, w tym również z Polski. Działalność duszpasterska jezuitów w tym miejscu koncentrowała się na wykorzystywaniu dziedzictwacyrylo-metodiańskiego do prowadzenia nowej ewangelizacji i obrony wartości chrześcijańskich w świecie.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.