Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Efektywność kosztowa
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pomiar efektywności kosztowej polskich bibliotek publicznych za pomocą metody DEA

100%
Prędki A.
Studia Ekonomiczne
|
2015
|
vol. 235
194-207
PL
Celem pracy jest zbadanie stopnia efektywności kosztowej polskich bibliotek publicznych na podstawie danych z roku 2000 dotyczących 240 powiatowych, miejskich i gminnych jednostek. Ponadto wskazane zostaną źródła nieefektywności poprzez porównanie ilości nakładów rzeczywistych z tzw. wielkością nakładów idealnych dla grupy badanych obiektów. Dobór nie w pełni aktualnych danych podyktowany jest ich dostępnością oraz możliwością porównania w przyszłości z rezultatami uzyskanymi w konkurencyjnym podejściu (analiza bayesowska na podstawie odpowiedniego, stochastycznego modelu granicznego).
EN
The purpose of the paper is testing level of the cost efficiency of Polish, public libraries on the basis of data from 2000 year concerning regional, municipal and communal units. Moreover sources of the inefficiency will be indicated through the comparison of real and ideal amount of inputs for group object being tested. Choice not fully actual data is dictated by theirs availability and opportunity to comparison in the future with results obtained by competitive approach (bayesian analysis on the base of the stochastic frontier model).
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Using a Fuzzy Approach in Multi-Criteria Decision Making with Multiple Alternatives in Health Care

84%
Jakubczyk M.
Multiple Criteria Decision Making
|
2015
|
vol. 10
65-81
EN
One of the responsibilities of the health care sector regulator is to decide which health technologies (drugs, procedures, diagnostic tests, etc.) should be financed using public resources. That requires taking into account multiple criteria, of which two important ones are: cost and effectiveness of a technology (others being, e.g., prevalence, safety, ethical and social implications). Hence, health and wealth need to be traded off against each other, and hence the willingness-to-pay (WTP) has to be determined. Various approaches to setting WTP have been taken, yet the results differ substantially. In the present paper I claim that the proper approach is to treat WTP as a fuzzy concept (the decision maker may not be able to decidedly state that a given health-wealth trade-off coefficient is acceptable/unacceptable - an idea backed up by the survey presented in the paper). Previous research shows how this fuzzy approach can be embedded in defining the preference relation and pairwise comparisons. In the present paper I account for the fact that there are often more than two alternatives available. To avoid difficulties that might arise (e.g., incompleteness or intransitivity of preferences) I show how the fuzzy approach can be used to define a fuzzy choice function based on the axiomatic approach. Some properties are discussed (e.g., how the approach handles the dominance and extended dominance), and the directions of further research are hinted at.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.