Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Exile
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The problem of global exile belongs to the most discussed challenge of the recent generation. There were more than 46 mln people in the world in status of migrant in the year 2014. The article is an attempt to find a biblical perspective and answers for one of the vital geopolitical issue of the present-day civilization. There are some topos-persons in the books of the Old Testament who could be de-scribed as migrants and pilgrims. The most important of them are Moses and King David as well as prophets Elijah, Jeremiah and Ezekiel. In the New Testament, the most famous image of exile could be found in the story of Jesus’ Childhood. The postmodern human being is often described as homo viatorum, but the real need of millions of people is to find their own home, the place on the earth when they can feel safe. The biblical impulse for the recent ethical debate is based on the Semitic prescription of hospitality. To be in solidarity with migrants is an ethical claim for European citizens.
EN
The article deals with the notion of exile and its significance in the Armenian historical and literary discourse. The exile represents in the Armenian context one of the cornerstones of Armenian ethnicity construction and it could be said without exaggeration, that Armenian history (both medieval and modern) is pervaded by this dominant or more precisely "key" theme. The exile symbolizes primarily the concept of uprootedness (exile from the country as well as the alienation from the society), which is conceived in close connection with the search for identity itself. In other words, the exile can be considered as a kind of "rite de passage" - the position on the border or "threshold" between two cultures, languages and worlds.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Jazyky v poezii exilu

75%
EN
The article focuses on the problem of several languages in poetry written in exile or reflecting exile. After a short theoretical and historical introduction, it deals with the Czech exile poetry after 1948 in which some basic relations to languages can be found. It starts with the perception of the second language as alien (by Jana Borová, Jaromír Měšťan), then treats the second language as a cultural feature of not a necessarily exilic milieu (by Milada Součková), and decribes the project of getting several foreign languages under control (by Ivan Blatný). The final part presents the conception of an Ursprache as a language field in which a subject is constituted (by Věra Linhartová).
EN
This essay analyses the life narratives of two European women - Anaїs Nin’s Diary and Eva Hoffman’s Lost in Translation - in order to investigate how their transition to North America affected their sense of self. It emphasises the key role that language and narrative play in the formation of identity, and argues that both writers reinvented themselves both in their adopted language and in writing.
EN
The purpose of this text is to gain a new perspective on the „University in Exile” established 1933 at New School for Social Research (New York) to endow some of Europe’s most brilliant social scientists of the epoch a safe area of intellectual discourse beyond the oppressions of the Fascist regimes in their native countries. The authors analyse the distribution and characteristics of the members’ power to shape faculty’s collective conduct concerning the quest for the nature of politics and society. The method applied is a cluster analysis factoring in the dimensions of occupational continuity, internal visibility, functional representation and interfacultative participation.
PL
Celem tekstu jest spojrzenie z nowej perspektywy na „Uniwersytet na Wygnaniu” założony w 1933 r. przy New School for Social Research (New York), by zapewnić kilku najznakomitszym europejskim naukowcom epoki z obszaru nauk społecznych bezpieczne miejsce intelektualnego dyskursu, z dala od represji faszystowskich reżimów w ich ojczystych krajach. Autorzy analizują podział i cechy wpływu członkow „Uniwersytetu” na kształt kolektywu Wydziału w odniesieniu do pytań o naturę polityki i społeczeństwa. Zastosowano metodę analizy klasterowej dla czterech wymiarów działalności naukowej: okres zatrudnienia, aktywność naukowa, pełnione funkcje i zaangażowanie międzywydziałowe.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.