Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Felix Guattari
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Koncepcja aury immanentnej

100%
Rudnicki C.
Estetyka i Krytyka
|
2013
|
issue 3(30)
99-116
XX
This article is devoted to the concept of „immanent aura.” In the first, historico-philosophical part, I discuss the theory of art presented by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari in the work What is Philosophy? In the second part, using concepts taken from these philosophers, I analyze selected works, included in the entertainment culture (inter alia black and viking metal music as well as computer games). I try to demonstrate that they can be considered as works of art, because they meet the requirements imposed by Deleuze and Guattari. In the last part I argue with the Benjamin’s concept of “aura” of the work of art, to show that mass reproducibility and availability does not lead to the disappearance of the aura but its transformation: from transcendent the aura becomes immanent.
2
Content available remote

O rizomie i cechach rizomatycznych na przykładzie powieści Michaiła Szyszkina „Взятие Измаила”

100%
Nowak G.
Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
|
2018
|
vol. 2
337-346
EN
The article is dedicated to the philosophical concept of rhizome developed by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari. The author tries to define the capabilities and limitations of rhizome in becoming a methodology for the interpretation of texts. Analysis of the six rhizome principles: connection and heterogeneity, multiplicity, asignifying rupture, cartography and decalcomania, based on Mikhail Shishkin’s novel “The Taking of Izmail”, shows that only the rules of connection and heterogeneity and asignifying rupture seem to originate from European philosophical tradition. Therefore, only these three rules of rhizome may become a method of literary interpretation.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Three Spheres of Catatonia in the Works of Gilles Deleuze

86%
Skonieczny K.
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
|
2020
|
vol. 4
|
issue 2
90-101
EN
The text traces the development of the notion of catatonia in the work of Gilles Deleuze across three spheres – the individual (subjectivity), social and literary. The need for an analysis is based on (1) the author’s perception that Deleuze (and Guattari’s) thought on catatonia and slowness has been undervalued in many interpretations (particularly those linking the philosophers with accelerationism); (2) the recognition, in works of sociologists such as Hartmut Rosa, of the adverse effects of social acceleration. In the individual sphere, catatonia is the effect of a radical withdrawal into anti-production or the body without organs. In the social sphere, catatonia is also linked to anti-production, but since in capitalism most anti-production (or the socius) is included in the sphere of production (as capital), catatonia represents a special case of resistance to this tendency. Deleuze shows how these two spheres intertwine in his analyses of Herman Melville’s works, especially Billy Budd and Bartleby; the title characters of these two texts are interpreted as embodiments of the catatonic as a political-revolutionary figure.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.