Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 15

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  French language
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Stylistic phenomena in the tittles of the French and Polish press

100%
Dyoniziak J.
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
|
2007
|
vol. 34
53-68
EN
The role of the media in the contemporary world is important and it isn’t limited only to communication. Equipped with specific techniques of writing, the media create mass culture. The following paper deals with stylistics proprieties of titles in the French and Polish press. The whole description is based on a large number of press titles which are interesting owing to their stylistics.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Métaphores dans le lexique, français et polonais, de l'hydrologie

100%
Kozar L.
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
|
2008
|
vol. 35
199-208
EN
Metaphor has been one of the most important research areas in linguistics for a few decades up to now. However, its value as a way of artistic expression in general language is indisputable, its presence in the specialised languages may be strongly questionable. How to explain the success of metaphor among the terms? What is its type and function? What is the mechanism of the meaning and the direction of metaphorisation in the language of hydrology, French and Polish? There are some questions to which the author of this paper attempted to find answers.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

“Ah non, je ne parle pas anglais moi. Je suis française !” Une contribution à la typologie des pragmatèmes

100%
de Oliveira R.
Neophilologica
|
2020
|
vol. 32
132-145
EN
This work presents and discusses the development of the hypothesis according to which clitic doubling (pronominal reduplication), as seen in the sentence “Je ne parle pas anglais moi. / I do not speak English [me]”, has the fundamental structural and pragmatic parameters of the pragmatem (R. D e O l i v e i r a, 2018). Structural, because it is a compositional construction but selected as a whole by the speaker to respond to a communication goal associated with a precise utterance situation (G. F l é c h o n et al., 2012); pragmatic, since this device is a means of acting on the interlocutive context, allowing the accomplishment of a certain number of specific acts (I. M e l’č u k, 2013). In this sense, we argue that, like the pragmatem, the devise called French clitic doubling simultaneously has the following three characteristics, it is (i) fixed, (ii) compositional, and (iii) associated with a specific utterance situation.
4

L’adjectif néologique en français actuel — tendances lexicogéniques

88%
Kacprzak A.
Romanica Wratislaviensia
|
2018
|
vol. 65
79-94
EN
Our article tackles the subject of the creation of the adjectives in French language in recent years. The questions that have arisen in the course of the investigation concern the vitality of the category of adjectives compared to other parts of speech, as well as the most frequent ways in which adjective neologisms have emerged in recent years. We also ask if the very significant influence of English language on the newest French lexis is also evident in case of adjectives, and finally whether the analysis of neologisms within this category enables to limit the field of study to Romance languages only.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Comment enseigner le discours scientifique en langue étrangère aux étudiants : la compétence discursive spécialisée à travers l’analyse des textes écrits

75%
Bobowska-Nastarzewska P.
Studia Romanica Posnaniensia
|
2022
|
vol. 49
|
issue 2
87-97
EN
The aim of the paper is to identify the methods of teaching academic discourse in French on the example of a selected written text whose subject matter is concerned with linguistics in connection with other disciplines. The analysis uses as its starting point the assumptions of the theory of the linguistic image of the world (J. Bartmiński) and of the cognitive linguistics (G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, R.W. Langacker) as applied in glottodidactics. While reading and understanding a written text, students activate the process of schematization (abstraction) and categorization/recategorization (R.W. Langacker). Teacher’s role is to explain specialized lexis to students and make an attempt with them to analyse scientific texts from an interdisciplinary perspective. It is also important to familiarize students with the editorial rules applicable to diploma dissertations, both bachelor’s and master’s in French as well as the criteria of textuality, in-cluding cohesion, coherence, intentionality, acceptability, informativity, situationality, and intertextuality (R.A. De Beaugrande, W.U. Dressler).
6

Les mots kotylion et biuwar en polonais d’aujourd’hui

63%
Bochnakowa A.
Białostockie Archiwum Językowe
|
2015
|
vol. 15
FR
Les deux mots d’origine française démontrent, en polonais d’aujourd’hui, un sens nouveau, éloigné de celui qui leur était propre au moment du passage en polonais (début du XIXe pour cotillon et début du XXe pour buvard). L’article a pour but de présenter, à travers l’histoire des deux mots, en polonais et en français, l’histoire de leurs référents. L’évolution sémantique de biuwar et de kotylion permet de saisir le changement dans l’emploi des deux mots, conditionné par la réalité extralinguistique. On montre aussi les rapports entre l’usage français et l’appropriation des étymons par l’emprunt par la langue polonaise. L’exemplification, une de plus, du phénomène de “faux amis” est alors donnée.
EN
The two words of French origin: biuwar (‘tissue paper’, since the beginning of the 20th century; fr. buvard) and kotylion (‘cotillion’, since the beginning of 19th century; fr. cotillion) have a different meaning in Polish than in the language they were borrowed from. The paper presents the history of the two words in French and in Polish as well as the history of their referents. Semantic evolution of the words biuwar and kotylion allows capturing a change in their use, subject to extralinguistic conditions. Relationships with the use of the words in French and references to French etymons in Polish are also indicated. The history of the two words in Polish is yet another example of a well-known phenomenon of “faux-amis”.
7
Content available remote

Les approches interdisciplinaires dans l’enseignement de la littérature

63%
Ledwina A.
Annales Neophilologiarum
|
2013
|
issue 7
73-85
EN
On the eve of the new millennium, as never before, the freedom of communication and the urge for exchanging the ideas acquires wider significance. It influences the field of language learning and contributes to the fact that the Romanic studies receive greater attention as the French language offers an alternative to the omnipresent English language. The article is an analysis of methods of learning but also methods of popularizing the French language. The author believes that practical knowledge along with the multicultural perspective on language will definitely improve the students’ learning abilities as well as broaden their knowledge and sensitivity towards the subject.
PL
Swoboda komunikowania się i wymiana doświadczeń były zawsze podstawą wszelkiego postępu, a w czasach współczesnych są wręcz sprawą absolutnie pierwszoplanową. Kluczem do sukcesu w tej dziedzinie staje się nauka języków obcych, w tym głównie języka francuskiego, który stanowi realną alternatywę dla wszechobecnego języka angielskiego w świecie nauki, kultury i codziennej komunikacji społecznej. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest zwrócenie uwagi na stosowane metody nauczania oraz popularyzowania języka francuskiego. Wydaje się bowiem, że tylko nowoczesna praktyczna nauka języka, mocno osadzona we współczesnych realiach społecznych, kulturowych, a nawet politycznych, gwarantuje rzeczywiste i trwałe podniesienie kompetencji językowych uczących się języka, poszerzenie ich horyzontów oraz otwarcie się na inne kultury.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Przenośne znaczenia terminów kulinarnych w języku polskim i francuskim

63%
Bochnakowa A.
Poradnik Językowy
|
2023
|
vol. 809
|
issue 10
84-93
EN
This article provides an overview of some examples of the figurative use of culinary terms in contemporary Polish and French. Words, phrases, and expressions in both languages contain commonly known culinary terms (e.g. Polish: kapuśniaczek, odgrzewane kotlety, wiedzieć, gdzie leżą konfitury, French: nouille, patate chaude, mettre du beurre dans les épinards) and are mostly used in colloquial language. A comparison of selected examples in both languages in terms of structure and meaning is presented. For some, it has been possible to explain the basis of the metaphor’s origin.
PL
Artykuł stanowi przegląd przykładów przenośnego użycia terminów kulinarnych we współczesnym języku polskim i francuskim. Wyrazy, wyrażenia i zwroty w obu językach zawierają powszechnie znane terminy kulinarne (np. pol. kapuśniaczek, odgrzewane kotlety, wiedzieć, gdzie leżą konfitury, franc. nouille, patate chaude, mettre du beurre dans les épinards) i używane są przeważnie w języku potocznym. Przedstawiono porównanie  wybranych przykładów w obu językach pod względem struktury i znaczenia. Dla niektórych udało się wyjaśnić podstawę powstania metafory.
9
Content available remote

Nářečí v českém překladu Falletova románu La soupe aux choux (Zelňačka)

51%
Komárková Z.
Naše řeč (Our Speech)
|
2018
|
vol. 101
|
issue 1
38-48
EN
In translating the novel La Soupe aux choux (Cabbage Soup) into Czech (as Zelňačka), the main problem seems to lie in the creation of an adequate equivalent of the stylized speech of the French villagers from the Bourbon area. A traditional territorial dialect (above all from Moravia or Silesia) would imply a false location, therefore it proved useful to primarily combine language means belonging to multiple sub-groups of the so-called Czech dialects in the narrower sense, and to supplement this base with some less current elements (e.g. from Moravian dialects).
10
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Le tabou dans la langue culinaire ?

51%
Bochnakowa A.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Romanica
|
2017
|
issue 12
81-88
EN
The article presents an overview of Polish and French culinary terms related to offal that can be considered as euphemisms. These are the dishes prepared from organ meats, specifically the liver, tongue, kidneys, lungs etc. In both languages one can observe the use of diminutives: fr. cervelle, pl. móżdżek from mózg ‘brain’, pl. żeberka from żebra ‘ribs’. Different names are sometimes used for the dish and anatomical part: pl. ozór/ozorek ‘tongue’, pl. cynaderki, fr. rognons - reins ‘kidney’. Avoiding the use of a proper name (body part) to describe a dish is an euphemism, as if the name of an animal organ prepared for consumption should not be used (in spite of the names such as French cuisse de poulet (pl. kurze udko ‘chicken leg’), tête de veau (pl. główka cielęca ‘veal head’, diminutives in Polish). Aren’t the strategies mentioned used in order not to reveal anatomical analogies and the identity of human and animal organ names?
FR
L’article contient une présentation des termes culinaires français et polonais qui peuvent être considérés comme des euphémismes. Il s’agit des noms des plats préparés à partir des abats (foie, langue, testicules, coeur, etc.) donc des parties « non nobles » des animaux comestibles. Dans les deux langues, mais surtout en polonais, on observe l’emploi des diminutifs formés à partir des noms anatomiques : fr. cervelle, pl. móżdżek de mózg ‘cerveau’, pl. żeberka de żebra ‘côtes’, etc. Parfois, un nom différent de celui de l’organe est utilisé pour désigner le plat : pl. ozór/ozorek ‘langue’, pl. cynaderki à côté de nerki, fr. rognons, à côté de reins, etc. Le fait d’éviter le nom propre de l’organe pour désigner un plat relève de l’euphémisme, comme si le nom de l’organe de l’animal préparé à la consommation ne devait pas être utilisé (à côté, pourtant, de cuisse de poulet ou tête de veau, en polonais avec des diminutifs : kurze udko, główka cielęca). Est-ce pour ne pas mettre en évidence les analogies anatomiques et l’identité des noms des organes de l’homme et de l’animal que nous recourons dans nos langues aux stratégies mentionnées ci-dessus ?
11
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Mon lapin, ma biche ou loulou ? La fréquence d’emploi des surnoms d’amour pour femmes et pour hommes en français de France et en français québécois

51%
Mudrochová R., Pereira dos Santos N. E.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Romanica
|
2021
|
issue 16
209-220
EN
The objective of this article is to analyze the use of love nicknames for women and men in the French-speaking context, especially in France and Quebec. From the lexicographic devices and resources of the Web, we have developed a corpus of words which we have analyzed in more detail with the tools of corpus linguistics, namely on the platform Néoveille and in the corpora Araneum allowing to measure the frequencies of employment in the two distinct contexts, French (from France) and Québécois French. This article has a threefold purpose. First, we will try to characterize and classify the affectionate nicknames. Second, we will present all of the words collected for our analysis and we will comment on them according to the processes of their formation or their belonging to a specified domain. Finally, we will verify the frequency of use of a sample of words chosen from the linguistic corpus mentioned above and we will notably compare the two contexts of our research to be able to decide on their similarities or differences.
FR
L’objectif de cette communication est d’analyser la productivité et l’usage des surnoms d’amour pour femmes et pour hommes dans le contexte francophone, notamment en France et au Québec. À partir des dispositifs lexicographiques et des ressources de la Toile, nous avons élaboré un corpus de mots que nous analysons plus en détail avec des outils de la linguistique de corpus, à savoir sur la plateforme Néoveille et dans les corpus slovaques Aranea permettant de mesurer les fréquences d’emploi dans les deux contextes distincts français et québécois. Premièrement, nous allons caractériser et classifier, en général, les surnoms affectifs pour femmes et pour hommes. Deuxièmement, nous allons présenter les mots recueillis pour notre analyse et nous allons les commenter en fonction des processus de leur formation ou de leur appartenance à un domaine déterminé. Finalement, nous allons vérifier la fréquence d’emploi et la productivité d’un échantillon de mots choisi dans des corpus linguistiques choisis, et nous allons comparer les deux contextes de notre recherche pour pouvoir nous prononcer sur leurs ressemblances ou différences.
12
Content available remote

„Francuzy“ i „russkije“ v zerkale jazyka : vzaimnye otraženija (na materiale etnonimičeskich i toponimičeskich derivatov)

45%
Berezovič E. L., Kabakova G. I.
Acta onomastica
|
2016
|
vol. 56
25-45
EN
The article analyzes certain lexical units of the Russian and French languages which function as semantic and morphological derivatives of ethnonyms and macrotoponyms: in Russian - derivatives of the ethnonyms француз, галл and toponyms Франция, Париж; in French - derivatives of the words Russe, Russien ´Russian´, Cosaque ´Cossack´ to ´a Russian soldier´ to ´Russian´, Moscou ´Moscow´, Moscovite (archaic) ´an inhabitant of Muscovy, Russian´. Additionally, the article focuses on set expressions containing the above-mentioned words. Considering this material, the authors conduct a contrastive study of cultural and linguistic images of the French and the Russians (in Russian and French, respectively). The article studies the following thematic spheres of secondary semantics: „Character traits, behaviour“; „Diseases“; „Appearance“; „Language“; „The quality of life, welfare“; „History“. The authors reveal the motivation of language facts, analyze the evaluative components in their meaning and draw conclusions about the main patterns in the development of the images of the nations in question.
13

Jak brzmi francuski Fortepian Szopena o trudnościach przekładu literackiego

45%
Giszczak J.
Studia Norwidiana
|
2013
|
vol. 31
71-90
XX
It is a comparative analysis of three French translations of Chopin’s Piano: by Joseph Pérard (1937), Feliks Konopka (1957) and Krzysztof Jeewski (1983). The linguistic choices made by the translators make it possible to point to those parts of the text of the poem by Norwid that can hardly be translated – sometimes due to the very essence of the original language and of the language of the translation. The author also offers his own version of the translation of Norwid’s work.
14
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Jak brzmi francuski Fortepian Szopena. O trudnościach przekładu literackiego

45%
Giszczak J.
Studia Norwidiana
|
2013
|
vol. 31
71-90
EN
It is a comparative analysis of three French translations of Chopin’s Piano: by Joseph Perard (1937), Feliks Konopka (1957) and Krzysztof Jeżewski (1983). The linguistic choices made by the translators make it possible to point to those parts of the text of the poem by Norwid that can hardly be translated – sometimes due to the very essence of the original language and of the language of the translation. The author also offers his own version of the translation of Norwid’s work.
15
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Les mots amour et miłość, aimer et kochać dans la langue française et polonaise : aspect sémantique, dérivation, phraséologie

45%
Bochnakowa A.
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Romanica
|
2021
|
issue 16
49-55
EN
The text is a presentation of the presence of the words amour/miłość (Eng. love) and aimer/kochać (Eng. to love) in French and Polish, taking into account the differences in semantics and use in both languages. The semantic relationship of the words amour/miłość and amitié/przyjaźń (Eng. friendship) is indicated, as well as the difference in the degree of semantic intensity between these words. Their derivative phrases and phraseological expressions in which they appear are also presented. The richness of the synonyms for the French word aimer is noted as well as the difference in the meaning of Polish words kochać and lubić (Eng. to like) and their French counterparts aimer and aimer bien/beaucoup with the use of strengthening adverbs, which paradoxically reduce the intensity of the emotional meaning of the verb aimer ‘to love’ to a degree corresponding to the meaning of Polish lubić in specific contexts. Although the words amour and aimer belong to language universals, their meanings and scope of use turn out to be different in both languages.
FR
Ce texte est une présentation du fonctionnement des mots amour/miłość i aimer/kochać en français et en polonais, afin d’índiquer les différences de sens et d’emploi dans les deux langues. On compare des relations sémantiques entre les mots amour/miłość et amitié/przyjaźń, ainsi que leur expressivité. On présente aussi les dérivés, les phraséologismes contenant ces mots. Il est à constater une grande richesse synonymique du français aimer, ainsi qu’une différence sémantique entre les verbes polonais kochać et lubić et leurs équivalents français aimer et aimer bien/beaucoup renforcés par des adverbes d’intensité qui, paradoxalement, réduisent le sens émotionnel du verbe aimer ‘aimer d’amour’ au degré correspondant à lubić ‘aimer bien’ dans certains contextes. Bien que les mots amour et aimer appartiennent aux universaux du langage, leurs champs sémantiques diffèrent dans les deux langues.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.