Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Fundusz Ubezpieczeń Społecznych (FUS)
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
XX
Celem artykułu jest analiza przychodów i wydatków FUS od 1999 r. do 2010 r. Okres ten obejmuje pierwsze lata działalności zreformowanego systemu ubezpieczeń społecznych oraz czas, w którym wprowadzano zmiany opóźniające realizację zamierzonych pierwotnie celów reformy. (fragment tekstu)
EN
The paper analyzes the revenue and expenditure of the Social Insurance Fund (SIF) from 1999 to 2010. This period covers the first years of the reformed social security system and the time at which a number of regulatory change was introduced. In the analyzed period both revenue and expenditure of social insurance increased, while revenues grew faster than expenses. The higher revenue growth marked by subsidies from the state budget than revenues from social security premiums. Among the largest share of expenditure accounted for transfers to the population, which were paid primarily in the form of pensions. The analysis shows that the reform of social security system, despite the delays in the implementation of certain objectives, contributed to many positive changes. It affected the growth of insured persons, a drop in payments of inability to work, and the increase in the average age of persons who have been granted pension benefits. (original abstract)
EN
The article contains the comparative analysis of functioning of public funds of the social insurance in Poland. It turns out that significant disproportions exist in amounts of contributions paid by policy holders into ZUS and the KRUS. Unfortunately, an introduced reform of the insurance plan does not get rid of these irregularities. According to the author, it would be essential to include numerous group of farmers into the universal system. It should be an effect of taken action: increasing income to FUS, lowering the amount of transferred subsidies to the fund from the state budget, the efficiency rise of the farm labour, the rise of average size of agricultural farm and curbing the "hidden unemployment" in the farming. 145-152
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.