Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  HISTORICAL GRAMMAR
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

FACTITIVE CONSTRUCTIONS IN A MIDDLE HUNGARIAN CORPUS

100%
Horvath L.
Magyar Nyelvor (Hungarian Language Guardian)
|
2006
|
vol. 130
|
issue 1
60-73
EN
This paper is one of the syntactic draft chapters that a team of the Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences have produced to be included in the Middle Hungarian volume (1526-1772) of 'The Historical Grammar of the Hungarian Language'. The author aims at clarifying some theoretical issues concerning the delimitation of verbal voices on the one hand, and, on the other, at presenting factitive constructions both from the point of view of the head and of the complements, on the basis of a Middle Hungarian corpus that is composed of texts of heterogeneous genres.
2

PREČO NÁPIS NA BOJNIANSKEJ PLAKETE NIE JE HLAHOLSKÝ (PRÍSPEVOK DO DISKUSIE O NAJSTARŠOM SVEDECTVE O JAZYKU Z KONCA 9. STOROČIA)

75%
Kralčák Ľ.
Slovenská reč (Slovak Language)
|
2014
|
vol. 79
|
issue 3-4
145 - 154
EN
This article is an interpretation of the inscription on one of the two precious gilded plaquettes, found on an archeological site of a Slavic settlement from before the Great Moravia period, located near the village of Bojná, Slovakia. The article is a reaction to P. Žigo’s interpretation of the inscription, which takes it as an abbreviation of the 1st verse of the 24th Psalm of David. Faced with another close reading accompanied by notes on historical grammar and paleography, such an interpretation becomes questionable. The text of the inscription does not have the same word order as the version of the psalm the Psalterium Sinaiticum manuscript. Moreover, Žigo fails to read correctly a preposition located here at the beginning of the 1st verse. Notes on historical grammar focus on the incorrect grammatical form used to convey a directional meaning. Two major paleographical problems of Žigo’s interpretation concern the characteristics of two reportedly Glagolitic graphemes. After taking these objective reservations into account, Žigo’s interpretation cannot be accepted.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.