Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 34

first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  HISTORY OF SCIENCE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The fall of the 1863 rising in the Russian-occupied lands of Poland contributed to ruining the country's economy. The effects could be seen especially in agriculture, the main branch of the economy. At the same time, the victorious Russian authorities also restricted to a minimum any Polish specialist education at the secondary and tertiary levels. In those circumstances many aware citizens decided to organize agricultural (and naturalist) education for Poles by means of self-instruction, and in particular by publishing encyclopaedias. In the years 1873-1902 three series of such encyclopaedias were published: 1. An encyclopaedia of agriculture and of information connected with agriculture (five volumes in the years 1873-1879; 278 extensive surveys of a college-textbook type). 2. An agricultural and agricultural-industrial encyclopaedia (three volumes in the years 1888-1890, with short entries of a reference-item type). 3. An encyclopaedia of the Museum of Industry and Agriculture (eleven volumes in the years 1890-1902, with 614 entries of a monographic-survey type). Conspicuous in the first and the third of those encyclopaedias is the broad range of studies relating to the natural sciences (geology and mineralogy, botany and zoology, as well as the history of science and technology). The level of the information contained in the encyclopaedic entries is very high, with such information being based on the latest literature of the respective subjects (published in Poland and abroad), which can, for example, be seen in the treatment of concept of quaternary glaciation in Europe. As for the history of science, the encyclopaedias mainly brought information on the achievements of Polish naturalists. The encyclopaedias made a major contribution to reviving the national economy, by promoting education through self-instruction. The first two encyclopaedias were devised by specialists living in the Russian-held part of Poland, while among the authors of the third encyclopaedia there were also professors of Polish tertiary schools from the Austrian-held part of Poland (including S. Jentys, J. Niedzwiedzki, J. Siemiradzki). The encyclopaedias thus constitute an interesting part of the cultural heritage of Poland in the 19th and 20th centuries.
2
Content available remote

Chemicy sami o sobie w 1957 roku

100%
EN
A description presents the materials of questionnaire, which was filled up by the most eminent Polish chemists, and was inquired by a co-operative managed by professor Włodzimierz Hubicki in 1957 within the process of preparing biographical dictionary including elementary information on the most eminent historical and present-day representatives of all of the branches from the whole world (without mythological figures). The dictionary was not published. However, a valuable biographic material subsists, and was prepared by the chemists themselves (71 of 88 persons filled up their questionnaires) according to the following established pattern: surname and forename, date and place of birth, course of the university studies and professional career, place of the present didactic and scientific activity, academic dignities, scientific works, published manuals, awards for scientific works. The introduction includes a description of the conditions in that the chemists were polled, and the activity of a co-operative, which compiled the questionnaires. A complete set of originals (letters, questionnaires, biographies, publishing agreements, settlements of accounts) was transferred to the Record Office of Polish Academy of Sciences.
EN
In this article, the author presents some critical remarks on the Lucio Russo's book 'La rivoluzione dimenticata. Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienza'. He focuses his attention on a few proposals presented by Russo. The first of them is treating the history of science as a key to understanding and interpretation of the history of European civilisation. Looking on the history of mankind merely from the point of view of politics, military or eventually technical events seems to loose the meanings of many historical events. One of such events was the cultural revolution in the 3rd century B.C., which occurred under influence of Greek mathematics. He argues against the concept of 'revolution in science' and replaces it by the concept of 'breakthrough'. He thinks that revolutions take place in the culture (broadly understood), but not in science. Moreover, he thinks that the breakthrough in ancient science had taken place not in the 3rd century (as Russo considers) but in the 4th century B.C. He tries to justify that recognition of mathematics as the introduction and essence of rational thinking and its inclusion into the system of education was the direct factor of the cultural revolution. The next interesting Russo's proposal is the presentation of a connection between exactness of mathematics and technical applications and use of the degree of exactness as a criterion for technical development in given epoch. The author thinks that the most valuable in the Russo's book is showing by means of several historical examples how European culture has retrieved the lost works of ancient scholars. It is a little depleted and promising research program in the history of science. Moreover, he argues against the main thesis of that book, i.e. that the modern science originated in the 3rd century B.C. Russo justifies that the whole development of the European science, since the Middle Ages throughout the Renaissance and modern times, is mainly an arduous trial of understanding scholar texts from the Hellenistic epoch. The author argues that ancient people really discovered the scientific method and it took place in the 4th century B.C. when mathematics refuted an accusation made against it and all rational thinking.
EN
The goal of the current paper is to present the evolution of views on Witelo and the assessment of his contribution to the development of the natural sciences. The paper is based on studies devoted to the history of the natural sciences, chapters containing historical introductions in textbooks, and popular-scientific publications devoted to the field. The paper deals mainly with Polish writings on the topic. The paper points to recurring mistakes in such writings, and these involve not only the spelling of Witelo's name. The paper stresses important role played in the evolution of the Witelonian tradition by Risner's publication in 1572, in one volume entitled 'Opticae thesaurus', of Alhazen's work 'De aspectibus' and Witelo's 'Perspectiva'. Because Risner included references in Witelo's text to assertions made by Alhazen, it is likely that this led to the appearance of unfavourable comments with regard to Witelo at the end of the 16th century. Similar critical opinions were repeated in the 18th and the first half of the 19th centuries, and sometimes they persist even today. Their authors stress the dependence of Witelo's views on those of Alhazen's, without noticing the circumstance that the latter scholar also made recourse to works of other authors. Witelo's 'Perspectiva' dealt mainly with issues in astronomy, physics and mathematics. It is for the reason that Witelo's views are taken account of in works on the history of those sciences. Yet, in spite of the fact that Book Ten of Witelo's 'Perspectiva' provided the basis of meteorological optics, Witelo is disregarded in the history of meteorology. On the other hand, due to the fact that in his 'Perspectiva' Witelo included a description of the structure of the eye, its geometrical model and a discussion of the process of vision, his work is of interest also to historians of medicine The analysis of the material collected in the paper leads to the conclusion that historians of natural sciences have a rather superficial knowledge of the content of the 'Perspectiva' and the person of Witelo himself.
EN
The aim of the paper is to analyse the key issues in Polish-French relations in the field of science and education in the 1970s. The paper is based on an analysis of archival materials gathered as a result of a search in French and Polish archives. The analysis has shown that the political transformations in the 1970s (due to detente in international relations) resulted in an ongoing process of extending contacts between institutions and individuals engaged in scientific and scholarly activity in the two countries. As for education, a constant problem related to the question of teaching Polish in France. The analysis also points to the main problems relating to the functioning of the Centre de Civilisation Française at the University of Warsaw, of the French Reading Rooms in Warsaw and Cracow, as well as the that of the Scientific Center of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Paris. The overall conclusion of the paper is that in the period in question a lot of progress was made in the field of Polish-French scientific and educational ties compared to the previous decades. A limited opening towards the West, one of the keystone elements of Edward Gierek's foreign policy, bore fruit in much wider opportunities for exchanges of scientists and students, as well as of secondary school pupils. Impediments to the development of such contacts came mainly from the decreasing financial possibilities of the departments and institutions involved. It also seems that Poland was not regarded in France as a very attractive partner in scientific and scholarly exchange. This, however, does not mean that there were no areas in scientific and scholarly contacts in which collaboration proceeded very fruitfully. Nonetheless, the precise determination of the scale of such collaboration will require further, more specialized research.
EN
This article presents reconstruction of Hellenist methodology formulated by Lucio Russo in his book 'Forgotten revolution'. Russo puts forward hypothesis that scientific method generally has its source in Hellenist period of antique Greece. The author argues that modern methodology often repeated discoveries of Hellenist Greek scholars. Good example of such a parallel are Hellenist phaenomena and their modern equivalents - protocol sentences in logical positivism. Methodological model of science formulated by Russo to explain history if science is based on three principles: theoreticality, deductiveness, and regularity. However, this definition seems a bit too narrow for Hellenist methodology and far too narrow for modern paradigms of sciences.
EN
AIM: Analyzing and duplicating a genuine hand-written French text of the first statement about discovery of polonium presented to Academy of France on July 18, 1898, which was written with few corrections in Maria Skłodowska-Curie's own hand, together with its exact translation into Polish. 
RESULTS: In a manuscript one cannot find any corrections written in own hand of Piotr Curie, who was mentioned as the first author of the statement. The authoress - Maria Skłodowska-Curie - set her name to the statement as the second signatory in the following form: 'Mme (previously, in a crossed out version: 'Madame') S. Curie'. In her signature the authoress placed a letter 'S' as an initial of her maiden name Skłodowska (and not as an initial of the name). The statement was published in the columns of Comptes Rendus de l'Academie Française. Previously, in the statement, which was issued by the same periodical, the authoress presented her surname in a version: 'Mme Skłodowska-Curie'. So, she was anxious to insist on the fact that both of the statements came from one person. A way of setting the name to the discussed statement caused that some authors describing the discovery of polonium mistakenly considered a letter 'S' to be an abbreviation of the name. 
CONCLUSION: Formulating and writing in Maria Skłodowska-Curie's own hand the first statement about the discovery of the first radioactive element - polonium - confirms some authors' opinion, and particularly Polish ones', saying that a credit for a discovery of a new type of chemical elements - radioactive elements - should be primarily given to Polish scientist Maria Skłodowska-Curie, and not to her husband - Piotr Curie - who was a famous French physicist.
EN
Beverages based on fermented milk began to attract the attention of official medicine in the second half of the 19th century, first in Russia but later also in the lands of Poland and in Germany. Using observations of the practices of ethnic groups in southern and eastern Russia, where koumiss or kephir were traditionally consumed, it was concluded that the beverages could be effective in treating tuberculosis and diseases of the alimentary tract. At the same time, a number of studies were undertaken to establish the chemical composition and the curative properties of koumiss and kephir and to investigate the processes of milk fermentation. The research soon revealed that those beverages did not contain any specific ingredient that would be effective in treating tuberculosis. It was noted, however, that beverages based on fermented milk could be an effective supplement in treating a number of diseases that led to the emaciation of the body. Polish scientists were among the first to take an interest in the curative properties of koumiss and kephir, and to start research on the two beverages. This is testified to by a number of papers published in the period of 1860s -1880s in Polish medical journals. The uses of koumiss and kephir in medicine were discussed in publications by, among others, E. Milosz (1868), Wiktor Jagielski (1871) and Boleslaw Lutostanski (1872); the chemical composition, microflora and fermentation processes were discussed in works by Aleksander Weinberg (1869), Franciszek Fijalkowski (1875), M. Heilpern (1886) and Leon Nencki and Aleksander Fabian (1887).
9
Content available remote

RELATIONS BETWEEN DUKE WLODZISLAW AND WITELO

80%
EN
Peter Lombard's 'Sententiae' of the 12th century contained rigorous rules on the ordination of priests, which were followed by popes. The regulations also concerned the Piast Duke of Wroclaw and Archbishop of Salzburg, Wlodzislaw, as well as his peer from the time of their studies at the faculty of liberal arts at Paris, master Witelo. The current paper deals with the relations between Duke Wlodzislaw and Witelo. It also presents the whole of the duke's life and, in the case of Witelo, gives a detailed account of the period of his studies. Details of Witelo's later life are presented in a book by the author of the article, entitled 'Witelo filosofo dalla natura del XIII sec. Una Biografia', Wroclaw 1984.
EN
The author has analysed the work of members of the Polish Tourist Society (Polskie Towarzystwo Krajoznawcze, PTK) conducted in the 1930s on devising 'A geographical dictionary of the lands of Poland and of countries historically linked with Poland', with the aim of assessing the contributions by particular authors and gaining knowledge of the said dictionary. Because the relevant sources have not been preserved in an adequate degree, the analysis focuses on reports in the key periodicals published by PTK: 'Ziemia' (The Earth), 'Przegląd Krajoznawczy' (Tourist Review), 'Sprawozdania Polskiego Towarzystwa Krajoznawczego' (Reports of PTK) and 'Orli Lot' (Flight of the Eagle), as well as the preserved fascicules of the volume of the dictionary. The study has made it possible to ascertain the following facts: members of the PTK undertook an enormous effort, working both in libraries and, above all, in the field; they managed to enlist the cooperation of eminent scholars; enough material was collected and prepared for two volumes of the dictionary, but only an incomplete first volume was published (events of September 1939 -outbreak of WW II - caused work on the dictionary to be discontinued); as for the methodology, the entries were standardized according to a division between specific entries, more elaborate general entries (e.g. architecture, economy, etc.) and dictionary entries proper, relating to particular localities.The initiative to devise the dictionary as well as the effort that went into drafting it constituted a major research and editorial effort. The editorial board, which was headed by Stanislaw Arnold, and whose role was to supervise the work of many field researchers and systematize the materials that were sent in, managed to publish an incomplete first volume of the dictionary. The project exhibited a very high level of scholarship, thanks to the cooperation of major specialists in the research and editorial work on the dictionary. It is to be regretted that work on the dictionary was discontinued and not resumed after the end of WW II. This, however, was impossible because of the changed political circumstances in Poland after the war.
11
Content available remote

Polemics with Lucio Russo

80%
EN
The author evaluates Russo's ideas from postmodernist position. Contrary to L. Russo, who emphasizes the continuity and the commensurability in the history of science, he suggests that one should stress also discontinuity and incommensurability. Russo loses what is new and different in relation to Hellenistic science. He interprets the history of science as a repetition of the same Hellenistic paradigm. In his work, there is no emergence of novelty. From the other side, criticizing his exaggeratedly formalistic point of view, the author refers to the arguments of Heyting, Brouwer and I. Lakatos.
EN
The writing of valuable scientific publications has always been triggered by the activities of learned societies, tertiary educational institutions and the editorial boards of scientific journals. In the 19th century, Polish scientific writing was inspired mainly by the activities of the Warsaw Society of the Friends of Sciences (Towarzystwo Warszawskie Przyjaciól Nauk), which was responsbile for publishing its 'Yearbooks...' (Roczniki ..), and of Warsaw Physicians' Society , which published its 'Diary ...' (Pamietnik ...). There were also other journals that included works on the history of medicine and basic medical sciences, among them those that appeared in Warsaw: 'Klinika' (The Clinic), 'Gazeta Lekarska' (Physicians' Gazette), 'Zdrowie' (Health), as well as 'Krytyka Lekarska' (Physicians' Critique) and 'Przeglad Chirurgiczny' (Surgical Review), which were established by Józef Polak; in Cracow: 'Rocznik Wydzialu Lekarskiego Universytetu Jagiellonskiego' (Yearbook of the Medical Faculty of the Jagiellonian University) and 'Wiadomosci do Antropologii Krajowej' (News for National Anthropology); and in Poznan: 'Nowiny Lekarskie' (Physicians' News). The key to medical writings in the 19th century is provided by a cross-referenced bibliography compiled by Stanislaw Konopka.
EN
The paper focuses on the exploration, and later the drawing of maps, of territories that are far removed from the civilizations responsible for such attempts. In particular, it shows how the maps were at first filled with misleading images and then, along with gradual advances in the exploration of unknown lands and seas, how these were replaced by a picture more consistent with reality. It seems that maps of Northern Asia published in Western Europe since the 16th century are a particularly good example of the potential of maps as carriers of the Europeans' knowledge and ignorance. The maps document successive stages in the exploration of inaccessible areas of Siberia. They carry both elements taken over from the knowledge of ancient Greek geographers and those that were derived from the most recent discoveries made at the turn of the 16th and 17th centuries. It is interesting and quite characteristic of the maps of Siberia that fantastic and misleading content freely co-existed with bona fide information from field research. Until the second half of the 18th century, i.e. until a Russian atlas of the Russian Empire was published by the Academy of Sciences at St. Petersburg, maps appeared on the book market of Europe whose authors had no geographical knowledge at all. A very good example is provided by how the islands of Novaya Zemlya were represented on maps published by European publishing houses after the discoveries of Willem Barents.
EN
The survey of the teaching of history of medicine at medical schools in Poland presented in the paper covers the organizational framework of institutions concerned with the history of medicine and their staff, as well as the place of the subject in curricula. Despite an overall positive assessment, especially with regard to the teaching staff, the prospects are not optimistic. There is a widespread tendency to make medicine a science of an exclusively biological nature. The rapid development of contemporary medicine and pharmacy is conducive to eliminating from curricula everything that is not of direct use to the future profession of the students. Medical schools are now facing a reorganization. The paper thus carries a plea directed to all representatives of medical sciences in the authorities of tertiary educational institutions, as well as in decision-making bodies for tertiary education in Poland, to preserve and develop humanistic instruction in medical schools. This has to do not only with the intellectual development of future physicians, but also concerns shaping appropriate attitudes to doctor-patient relations, which are the main source of complaints with regard to the deficiencies of medicine.
EN
In the second half of the 19th century Polish science was a significant part of national cultural heritage, which had to be guarded, kept in hiding for better days and showed to other European nations as an important evidence of the Polish and favouring independence aspirations. The mentioned inheritance was also a crucial element of national identity – especially for Polish emigrants' circles that had to leave Polish territories after November and January Uprisings. Artur Wołyński (1844–1893) was, undoubtedly, one of the most interesting personages of Polish émigrés after January Uprising. He belonged to these circles of Polish émigrés, who were able to reconcile their patriotic aspirations with realities and interest of the countries that entertained them. As far as Wołyński is concerned, it found its expression in the efforts that were made in order to assimilate two nations – Polish and Italian people – appealing to the common history and familiar cultural traditions. An important element of integrating all the above-discussed actions was his scientific activity tending to popularize Polish science and culture in Italy.
EN
The goal of the current study is to show the usefulenes as source material of a manuscript by Karol de Perthees which presents the method used in compiling his detailed maps of particular provinces of Poland. In the manuscript, the cartographer presented his plan of work on the detailed maps and he described the methods thanks to which a certain degree of precision could be obtained in compiling maps on the basis of itineraries and accounts. The procedure used by de Perthees in his work is evident from the points which he used to summarize it: - On the division of the country in the detailed maps; - Details on the maps of provinces and districts; - On roads in general and on detailed distances from one place to another; - How to correct mistakes and supplement missing information; - On astronomical observations; - Interesting and useful details which can be added to maps of districts; - Notation to be used in the detailed maps. The manuscript is of great value as a source material for historical-geographical research, for it makes it possible to reconstruct successive stages in the drawing of de Perthees's maps.
EN
The main thesis of the article is that the revolutionary development of physics around the beginning of the 20th century was essentially conceptual, not empirical. Mechanical, electromagnetic, and optical phenomena needed a unified conceptual framework. This was achieved by the replacement of the Galilean transformation by the Lorentz transformation. But the basis and rationale for the Lorentz symmetry of inertial frames is fundamentally a priori. The role of empirical observation is auxiliary rather than justificational. One may conclude that Albert Einstein conceived his famous theory in his pure mind and reason. But one must also add with some melancholy that such great discoveries, achieved with such limited means, are impossible in the future development of physics. The uniqueness of the above revolution is analogous to that of the point zero on the diagram of exponential function.
EN
The article presents a historic and present description of foreign academic stations of Polish Academy of Sciences. These are – chronologically – stations in Paris, Rome and Vienna, Historical Research Centre in Berlin, Academic Station of Polish Academy of Sciences in Moscow and Science Promotion Bureau PolSCA in Brussels. For a more precise description the stations were showed in a wider historic and present-day context of other Polish and foreign posts of that kind. While presenting in general each of the mentioned centres of Polish Academy of Sciences, and particularly the Paris station, the author points out that despite different problems, the stations still develop and are essential. A more detailed description of the Paris centre – the oldest Polish academic station abroad – is to reveal a difficult and complicated process of arising such posts, and the process, which is additionally influenced by political context that occurred as a result of World War I, gaining the independent Polish State, World War II, the Polish People's Republic period. Having depicted all foreign stations of Polish Academy of Sciences, the author inquires about their status in Polish science, their mission, ways of managing and financing, about their future.
EN
The text concerns the process of publishing the yearly of Mianowski Fund entitled 'Polish Science' in the inter-war period and just after war. Stanisław Michalski (1865–1949) – an eminent pesonage actively engaged both in educational and scientific work – had a great share in the obtention of the possibility of editing 'Polish Science'. The paper includes both the description of his activity in this field and the subject of the twenty five volumes of 'Polish Science', and reveals the importance of the yearly for science before and just after the World War II.
EN
The article presents life and scientific output of Maksymilian Rose – an eminent Polish neuroanatomist and neuropathologist of the inter-war period. In the first period of activity he worked in Kaiser-Wilhelm Institut für Hirnforschung in Berlin, where was appointed to a post of head of Pathology Ward. In the years 1927–1929 he was an editor-in-chief of the renowned periodical Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie, and in 1928 returned to Poland. Having been appointed to a professorship at Department and Mental Clinic in the University of Vilna in 1931, also managed the Institute for the Researches on Brain. He was an originator of the modern science of brain cytoarchitectonics. Probably, the searches in this field brought him about the greatest discovery – a description of the new partitioning of the cerebral cortex, which resulted from its ontogenetic (embryological) development and from its differentiated behaviour in different parts of primary parent coat and primary cortex coat. The foundations of the modern neurocytoarchitectonics of cerebral cortex especially were laid by two scientists: the most eminent Spanish neurobiologist Santiago Ramón y Cajal and Polish researcher – Maksymilian Rose. Constantin Economo and Karl Kleist considered him for the creator of science of fields' differentiation of cerebral cortex from histological point of view.
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.