Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: Herodians

Sort By:

Limit search:

Epifaniusza z Salaminy krytyka doktryny herodian

100%

Ibkowska E.

Polonia Sacra

2015

vol. 19

issue 3(40)

49-62

Epifaniusz z Salaminy, przedstawiając sektę herodian, wskazuje na to, iż uznają oni króla Heroda za Chrystusa, namaszczonego lwa z pokolenia Judy, który jest dla nich nadzieją i wyczekiwanym wybawcą. Swoją wiarę opierają na tekście z Księgi Rodzaju. Jednakże Epifaniusz kontrargumentuje, iż żaden z narodów nie pokładał ufności w Herodzie oraz nikt nie widział, aby ten był w stanie ocalić ludzi poprzez ofiarę z samego siebie. Dlatego też Epifaniusz przestrzega przed pójściem za poglądami herodian. Biskup Salaminy wskazuje ponadto, iż grupa herodian o wiele za daleko posunęła się w interpretowaniu tekstu Pisma Świętego. Nie dosyć, że nie brali oni pod uwagę całego kontekstu, zarówno bliższego, jak i dalszego, wybranych przez siebie fragmentów, to jeszcze próbowali je tak wyjaśniać, aby przypodobać się panującemu władcy – Herodowi. To pokazuje, iż ich egzegeza była w pełni podporządkowana politycznym celom i nie miała nic wspólnego z poszukiwaniem prawdy i Boskich zasad. W obecnych opracowaniach dotyczących stronnictw żydowskich z czasów Jezusa Chrystusa nie pojawia się w odniesieniu do herodian wzmianka dotycząca ich wiary, jakoby Herod był wyczekiwanym Chrystusem. Widać więc, że ich działalność polityczna była o wiele bardziej rozwinięta niż ich wiara w zbawczą rolę dynastii herodiańskiej. Jako stronnictwo byli oni wierni dynastii reprezentowanej przez Heroda Wielkiego, dzięki któremu awansowali w hierarchii społecznej. W poglądach religijnych byli zbliżeni do faryzeuszy, przez co wspólnymi siłami próbowali zwalczyć groźnego w ich przekonaniu przeciwnika, jakim był Jezus Chrystus.

Epiphanius from Salamis, showing the Herodian sect, he points at the fact, that they will regard the king of Herod as the Christ, of lion rubbed with oil from the generation for them will stuff with Judy which is and with the waited savior. Their faith bases on the text from the Book of Genesis. But Epiphanius presents the counter argument that none of nations put the trust in Herod, as well as nobody could see, in order to the one was able to rescue people through the victim from oneself. Therefore Epiphanius warns against going behind Herodian views. Bishop of Salamis shows moreover that the Herodian group moved on too far in interpreting the text of the religious Letter. Not quite they didn’t take into consideration the entire, both closer and more distant context, of fragments chosen by oneself, still tried this way to explain them in order to ingratiate oneself ruling master, Herod. It is showing that their exegesis fully was subordinated to political purposes and not had anything to do with seeking the truth and Divine principles. Dating back to the Jesus of the Christ with reference to Herodian mention concerning their beliefs isn’t turning up at current studies concerning Jewish parties, that Herod was a waited Christ. So one can see, that their political activity was far more developed than, their faith in the salutary soil of the dynasty of Herod. As the party they were faithful of dynasty represented by Great Herod, thanks to which they were promoted in the social hierarchy. In religious views they were similar to pharisees, by what with shared powers tried to fight dangerous, in convincing them, of opponent a Jesus Christ was which.

Epifaniusza z Salaminy krytyka doktryny herodian

100%

Ibkowska E.

Polonia Sacra

2015

vol. 19

issue 3

Epiphanius from Salamis, showing the Herodian sect, he points at the fact, that they will regard the king of Herod as the Christ, of lion rubbed with oil from the generation for them will stuff with Judy which is and with the waited savior. Their faith bases on the text from the Book of Genesis. But Epiphanius presents the counter argument that none of nations put the trust in Herod, as well as nobody could see, in order to the one was able to rescue people through the victim from oneself. Therefore Epiphanius warns against going behind Herodian views.Bishop of Salamis shows moreover that the Herodian group moved on too far in interpreting the text of the religious Letter. Not quite they didn’t take into consideration the entire, both closer and more distant context, of fragments chosen by oneself, still tried this way to explain them in order to ingratiate oneself ruling master, Herod. It is showing that their exegesis fully was subordinated to political purposes and not had anything to do with seeking the truth and Divine principles.Dating back to the Jesus of the Christ with reference to Herodian mention concerning their beliefs isn’t turning up at current studies concerning Jewish parties, that Herod was a waited Christ. So one can see, that their political activity was far more developed than, their faith in the salutary soil of the dynasty of Herod. As the party they were faithful of dynasty represented by Great Herod, thanks to which they were promoted in the social hierarchy. In religious views they were similar to pharisees, by what with shared powers tried to fight dangerous, in convincing them, of opponent a Jesus Christ was which.

Refine search results

2 Polonia Sacra

2 Ibkowska E.

2 2015

Search results

Epifaniusza z Salaminy krytyka doktryny herodian

Epifaniusza z Salaminy krytyka doktryny herodian