Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Hierarchy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article deals with the Papal Primacy and the collegiality of Bishops in the light of Lumen Gentium constitution and how this issue was reflected in Czech exile theology and international theology. The Second Vatican Council does not clearly state whether the supreme power in the Church belongs to one or two holders. It also does not precisely defines the relationship between the Pope and the College of Bishops. The present text reflects on attitudes to this open question adopted by three Czech exiles: V. Boublík, A. Heidler and K. Skalický. The article consequently presents possible answers to the question of whether there are one or two holders of supreme servant power, both having found their supporters among prominent foreign theologians. The author points to facts that perhaps were not taken sufficiently into account in the search for the answer. Finally, he provides his own opinion. The supreme servant power belongs fully both to the Pope and the College of Bishops and there are therefore two holders. The theses outlined above and resulting in this conclusion are viewed as dynamic, complementary instances. The author does not come to this solution through law power logic, but through a personalist theological logic of love.
IT
Le Costituzioni apostoliche presentano uno dei documenti motto significativi per ta Chiesa net IV secoto, ma anzitutto ta testimonianza det tempo passato. La Chiesa, come é presentata net tibro, e una struttura cottegiate, non esiste nesun primato ne personate nś ufficiate. Nell'asembtea partano e discutano tutti i fedeti, anche prendendo te decisioni definitive. Si puó dire: E presente Piętro, ma non Micio di Piefro. I fedeti sono chiamati att'obedienza at vescovo che e indipendente in tutte te sue decisioni net suo territorio fuorche te situazioni in cui e Pautore di uno scandato e quindi viene sottoposto atte decisioni det sinodo detta propria provincia. Si puó trovare una gerarchia netPasembtea ma non e una gerarchia ufficiate; si puó dire che questa gerarchia e di stampo pratico non teotogico. Autorita di Trndizione Apostolica ha it carattere costitutivo per tutti i fedeti. La Chiesa nelle Costituzioni e ta Chiesa degti Apostoti, non di Pietro.
EN
Le "Costituzioni apostoliche" presentano uno dei documenti motto significativi per ta Chiesa nel IV secolo, ma anzitutto la testimonianza del tempo passato. La Chiesa, come é presentata net libro, e una struttura collegiale, non esiste nesun primato ne personale ne ufficiale. Nell'asemblea parlano e discutano tutti i fedeli, anche prendendo le decisioni definitive. Si puó dire: E presente Pietro, ma non "ufficio di Pietro". I fedeli sono chiamati all'obedienza al vescovo che e indipendente in tutte le sue decisioni nel suo territorio fuorche le situazioni in cui e l'autore di uno scandalo e quindi viene sottoposto alle decisioni del sinodo della propria provincia. Si puó trovare una gerarchia nell'asemblea ma non e una gerarchia ufficiale; si puó dire che questa gerarchia e di stampo pratico non teologico. Autorita di "Tradizione Apostolica" ha il carattere costitutivo per tutti i fedeli. La Chiesa nelle "Costituzioni" e la Chiesa degli Apostoli, non di Pietro.
EN
Background. This article refers to a line from my field research in Japan from 2012 to 2015, being a stage reference for my PhD in Social Anthropology and aims to relate some ethnographic facts collected with practitioners of Japanese swordsmanship (Kendo) - among them, Japanese and non Japanese – through the relationships made in the dōjō (the training places). The aim is to make an analogy between the notion of house within anthropological theory that remains an important practical concept for building a kinship and the studied case. By kinship and relatedness we understand the ways to make relatives, or an analytical mode for their mutual relations. ‘Relatives’ here have a more free sense, as ways of making relationship without implying human reproduction. In short, we use the training hall as the unit of analysis with the notion of House that tells us about building a kinship beyond blood. The plan is to relate some facts about the fieldwork, which operate in the concepts of hierarchy, family and Dōjō in a relationship with the notion of House, trying to build a model of interpretation. Aim. To build a model of interpretation based on the concept of House, since it looks like a suitable proposition. Methods. I used the following materials: bibliographic, structured forms, semi-structured interviews and conversations in Dōjō, and the method was ethnography, or the living experience of data research. The ethnographic fieldwork was conducted in Brazil (2007-2011) and Japan (2012-2013). In Japan, we conducted ethnography in Tokyo, Osaka, Kyoto, Kanagawa Ken and Ibaraki Ken. The data collection was structured in the form of questionnaires, semi-structured interviews and informal conversations, collected in Japan with Kendo practitioners of all possible nationalities. The questionnaires were applied at Kendo events or training sessions or sent by Facebook and email. Results and Conclusions. A new discussion about the anthropology of Kinship using a new analytical framework regarding he concepts of Hierarchy, House and Ie (Japanese House).
PL
Tło. Artykuł dotyczy badań terenowych autora przeprowadzonych w Japonii w latach 2012-2015, jest związany z pracą doktorską z antropologii społecznej. Jego celem jest przedstawienie etnograficznych faktów zebranych pośród adeptów szermierki japońskiej (kendo), z pochodzenia Japończyków oraz pochodzących z innych krajów, poprzez relacje dokonane w miejscu szkoleniowym, zwanym dōjō. Celem pracy jest stworzenie analogii między pojęciem Domu w ramach teorii antropologicznej, która pozostaje ważną praktyczną koncepcją budowania pokrewieństwa, z badanym problemem. Przez pokrewieństwo autor rozumie sposoby nawiązywania relacji wśród krewnych lub analityczny sposób tworzenia wzajemnych stosunków. Słowo „krewni” jest dość luźno rozumiane, jako sposoby tworzenia relacji bez dosłownej reprodukcji. W skrócie, dōjō jest wykorzystywane jako jednostka analizy z pojęciem Domu, który mówi o tworzeniu pokrewieństwa poza więzami krwi. Celem pracy jest powiązanie pewnych faktów dotyczących badań terenowych, które działają wewnątrz koncepcji hierarchii, rodziny i dōjō w związku z pojęciem Domu, starając się zbudować model interpretacji. Cel. Budowa modelu interpretacji oparta na koncepcji Domu. Metody. W pracy wykorzystano następujące materiały: bibliograficzne, zorganizowane formy, pół-strukturyzowane wywiady i rozmowy w miejscach treningowych, a metodą była etnografia lub życiowe doświadczenie wykorzystane przy zbieraniu danych do badań. Etnograficzne badania terenowe przeprowadzono w Brazylii (2007-2011) i Japonii (2012-2013). W Japonii, przeprowadzono badania etnograficzne w Tokio, Osace, Kioto, Kanagawie Ken i Ibaraki Ken. Dane zostały zebrane w postaci ankiet, formalnych i nieformalnych wywiadów, zebranych w Japonii z adeptami Kendo różnych narodowości. Ankiety przeprowadzono w czasie pokazów i szkoleń Kendo lub wysłano poprzez e-mail lub Facebooka. Wyniki i wnioski. Nowa dyskusja o antropologii pokrewieństwa w obrębie nowych ram analitycznych w odniesieniu do koncepcji Hierarchii, Domu oraz Ie (japoński dom).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.