Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Historical Jesus
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
The Biblical Annals
|
2016
|
vol. 6
|
issue 4
707-714
EN
Book review: Chris Keith, Jesus’ Literacy. Scribal Culture and the Teacher from Galilee (Library of New Testament Studies 413 – Library of Historical Jesus Studies 8; London et al.: Bloomsbury, 2013). Pp. XVI + 224. GBP 17.99. ISBN 9780567533975 (Paperback)
The Biblical Annals
|
2019
|
vol. 9
|
issue 2
335-354
EN
In the vox populi of Mark 6:14-16 (cf. 8:28), we find the puzzling claim that some believed Jesus was John the Baptist raised from the dead. The presentation of John in the Gospel is similar to Jesus: Mark depicts John as a prophetic figure who is arrested, executed, buried by his disciples, and-according to some-raised from the dead. This paper reviews scholarship on the question of whether the tradition concerning John's resurrection-as well as the tradition concerning his death to which it is prefixed (6:17-29)-originated outside of the early Christian community. We examine the possibility that sects or individuals in the ancient world believed John had indeed been raised from the dead-as well as figures supposedly connected to John (Dositheus, Simon Magus). We conclude on the basis of internal evidence from the Gospel that the report in 6:14-16 likely originated in a Christian context. At the same time, it may also provide a glimpse into first-century CE attitudes concerning the resurrection from the dead.
EN
The article presents the passage from the traditional defense of the historical value of the gospels (which followed the model of a judicial process in which the trustworthiness of witnesses and the eye-witness character of their testimony had to be proved) to the contemporary discussion, which for approximately the last fifty years has been developing and refining the criteria of historical reliability, in order to proceed to scrutinize each individual gospel text on these bases. His contribution lays out both the strong points and the weak points of the four criteria which end up being the most spendable and produce the most accurate results: the criteria of double dissimilarity, of multiple testimony, of coherence and of historical plausibility or sufficient explanation.
PL
L’articolo presenta il passagio dalla tradizionale difesa del valore storico dei vangeli (che ha seguito il modello di un processo giudiziario in cui l’affidabilità dei testimoni e il carattere oculare della loro testimnianza dovevano essere dimostrati) alla discussione contemporanea che per circa cinquanta ultimi anni ha sviluppato e raffinato i criteri di affidabilità storica, al fine di procedere ad esaminare ogni singolo testo evangelico su queste basi. Il suo contributo espone sia i punti forti che i punti deboli dei quattro criteri che finiscono per essere i più spendibili e produrre i risultati più accurati: i criteri di doppia dissomiglianza, di molteplice attestazione, di coerenza e di plausibilità storica o spiegazione sufficiente.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.