Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 4 Filozofia (Philosophy)

Years help

  1. 3 2013

  2. 1 2012

Authors help

  1. 4 Zouhar M.

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  INDEXICALISM
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

SÉMANTICKY RELEVANTNÉ PRAGMATICKÉ PROCESY (1): MINIMÁLNY INDEXIKALIZMUS A SATURÁCIA

100%
Zouhar M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2013
|
vol. 68
|
issue 3
181 – 193
EN
This is the first part of the paper in which it is claimed that there is exactly one semantically relevant pragmatic process, namely saturation. Saturation ascribes content to an expression (or another suitable syntactic unit) with respect to the context of its use. Saturation is usually discerned from so-called free enrichment which is supposed to be another semantically relevant pragmatic process. However, given its explanatory purposes, it is demonstrated that free enrichment is superfluous; for everything explained in terms of free enrichment can be explained fully in terms of saturation. Minimal indexicalism is a theory design to do so.
2

PRAVDIVOSTNÝ RELATIVIZMUS A BEZCHYBNÉ NEZHODY

100%
Zouhar M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2013
|
vol. 68
|
issue 7
549 – 561
EN
The paper deals with the so-called faultless disagreement which arises when two speakers believe in contradictory propositions, though neither of them makes any fault. This phenomenon is said to arise with respect to propositions about taste and similar propositions. The faultless disagreement is often used to support various versions of truth-conditional relativism. The main aim of the paper is to argue that what appears to be a faultless disagreement is by no means one. For an air of disagreement between speakers disappears once we (i) make it clear what notion of contradiction is invoked and (ii) explicitly adopt a relativistic notion of truth that is at most implicitly assumed in the relevant literature.
3

SÉMANTICKY RELEVANTNÉ PRAGMATICKÉ PROCESY (2): TESTY A METODOLOGICKÉ ASPEKTY

100%
Zouhar M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2013
|
vol. 68
|
issue 4
296 – 308
EN
This is the second part of the paper in which it is claimed that there is exactly one semantically relevant pragmatic process, namely saturation. The author analyses Recanati’s tests for free enrichment as well as Stanley’s test for saturation. It is claimed that all these tests lead to unacceptable generalizations. On the other hand, it is also claimed that minimal indexicalism avoids such generalizations because it requires a more flexible theory of language. Finally, the author outlines some methodological reasons preferring minimal indexicalism to another explanation which embraces free enrichment.
4

INDEXIKALIZMUS, SÉMANTICKÝ MINIMALIZMUS A PRAVDIVOSTNÝ OBSAH

100%
Zouhar M.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2012
|
vol. 67
|
issue 9
705 – 717
EN
It is sometimes claimed that the semantic (i.e., truth-conditional) content of an utterance consists of the semantic contents of its constituting expressions and their mode of composition, i.e., all constituents of the semantic content correspond to some linguistic item in the sentence uttered or other. This is claimed in particular by the proponents of the so-called semantic minimalism. The paper aims to show that indexicalism, which is often supposed to be a rival to semantic minimalism, is in fact a version of it. Indexicalism is willing to recognize, over and above explicit linguistic items, also the implicit ones. It is argued in the paper that semantic minimalism is capable to accommodate this idea without much ado.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.