Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 8

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  INGARDEN
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

O ontologii procesu Romana Ingardena

100%
Filo-Sofija
|
2008
|
vol. 8
|
issue 8
145-53
EN
The article presents the ontology of the time object. This issue, or better, this process is the significant subject of Ingarden’s The controversy over the existence of the world. The article shows the form of the process via analyzing its attitude towards the time, as well as its method of existence-in-time, and via proposing a new existence method called: the finding. The article presents endeavors to prove that the finding is typical for the existence in the past, being more or less, the trace of what has gone away.
EN
The academic education of Roman Ingarden can be divided into five stages, involving four different universities. It began in Poland, in Lviv, and was continued abroad in Göttingen, Vienna, and Freiburg im Breisgau. In this review article we describe Ingarden's studies in Germany in 1912-1914 and 1915-1917 at the Georg August University in Göttingen and the Albert Ludwik University in Freiburg Baden. We characterize this study period in terms of the academic courses Ingarden attended, professors and tutors he met, and other students he came into contact with at the time. We also describe Ingarden's relationships with the so-called Göttingen Circle.
EN
In the paper, the ontology of individual object and interpretation of it in the area of offers of goods and services is presented and reconstructed by the author. The ontology is defined on the basis of Roman Ingarden’s formal ontology, in particular on the basis of the theory of individual object.
EN
The increasing role of logic in 20th century philosophy, heavily stressed by the representatives of Polish analytical philosophy, met with reactions from representatives of other philosophical orientations. In the Polish context the dispute around this subject can be described as one between supporters of the theory that conditional implication comes down to material implication and those who question this theory. The first position is represented by Kazimierz Adjukiewicz, the second by Roman Ingarden. They represent extreme versions of these positions. Moderate positions on the subject can also be adopted. A moderate version of the second position involves accepting certain conditional sentences and treating them as logically inconstructible. A logical analysis of these sentences is allowed, which would involve turning some parts of these sentences into new conditional sentences in a limited way. A formal realization of this position is proposed.
EN
On the basis of a peculiar chess puzzle, the paper presents an analysis of a more general philosophical problem, which links chess with ontology and phenomenology, namely the problem of the ontological status of a chess piece. In The Controversy over the Existence of the World, Roman Ingarden presents the most complete study of this problem, as well as several other problems related to it which might be generally characterized as the fundamentals of the philosophy of chess. The presentation of Ingarden's considerations is supplemented by comments taken from works of other thinkers such as Husserl, Searle or Smullyan.
EN
Roman Ingarden believed that the ontological status of properties cannot be exhausted by the claim that properties are non-independent and fulfill the formal function of “belonging to” some object. To explain this he used the metaphor that “properties enter into the account of an object”, a version of the scholastic saying that “accidentia non sunt entia sed entis”. I argue that properties do not have their own qualitative content. For example, in the case of a bar of steel which has property of being hard, the quality of “hardness” does not inhere immediately in this property and then indirectly in the bar, but inheres directly in the bar. The property in question does not have hardness on its own. This seems trivial but it needs to be emphasized because some philosophers treat properties as objects, even if they claim that properties cannot exist without objects. The thesis of the formal heteronomy of properties consists just in this view: properties have no matter on their own. The second part of the article is devoted to the saying “accidentis esse est inesse”. I argue for a strict connection between the thesis that properties exist because of the object’s existence and the thesis of formal heteronomy, and I use the latter to argue against bundle theories of object.
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2019
|
vol. 47
|
issue 2
25 - 42
EN
The purpose of this article is to reconstruct Ginsberg's critique of Husserl's (semi-formal) whole and part theory. In order to clarify Ginsberg's position I refer to the terms introduced into ontological discourse by Roman Ingarden. Unfortunately, neither Husserl's whole-parts theory, nor Ginsberg's work on inseparability/separability, despite their undeniable merits, has attracted strong interest among many philosophers. But one could, for instance, fruitfully investigate whether their detailed analyses of whole-part theory, inseparability/separability, different kinds of relations, and forms of dependence, have something of value to offer in the current discussions in continental philosophy, or even in analytic philosophy of modern ontology. According to Husserl's intuition, these topics are fundamental to ontology and therefore they are still relevant; there is still much to learn from those painstaking investigations of ontological relations. In this article, I do not discuss Ginsberg's criticism of the intentional or “psychologistic” approach to the question of inseparability/separability, because it is worth discussing in a separate paper.
EN
The purpose of this paper is to present and compare three phenomenological theories of questions that arose in first decades of the twentieth century. These are thoughts of J. Daubert, M. Heidegger, and R. Ingarden. Such a comprehensive subject of research not only allows us to examine the most fervent period of phenomenology when the common assumptions and chief points of the phenomenological movement were formed, not only gives us occasion to compare the phenomenology of the various representatives whose ideas have not yet been compared, but also provides an opportunity to look at the origins of twentieth-century erotetics, which, especially in Poland, has had a number of prominent representatives.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.