Search results

1

Rada Naukowo-Konserwatorska przy Dyrektorze Naczelnym PP Pracownie Konserwacji Zabytków

100%

Krzyżanowski L.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1978

|

issue 3

195

2

Dyskusja nad artykułem J. Stankiewicza

63%

Bogdanowski J., Kalinowski W., Krzyżanowski L., Billert A., Czerner O.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1975

|

issue 2

111-124

EN

A SUMMARY OF A STATEMENT BY A. BILLERT The importance of article by J. Stankiewicz has been uuierlined by the author who is of opinion that it deserves the more attention owing to the fact alone that it deals wiih questions until now not dealt in any more comprehensive manner. Tin author of the present statement has focussed his attention on the problem of some kind of demarcation between the protected spatial settings coming from the past times and the modern architectural and town planning solutions. At the moment when it has come to a direct contact between these two kinds of settings a crisis has arisen in the range of preservation and protection of historical monuments having its background in changes occurring in social consciousness and culture as well as a crisis of the man’s civilizational environment and within it another crisis, this time the crisis of a town as such. The next problem considered by the author consists in transmission of components of culture; ho s tat os that under modern conditions the museum concept is more and more frequently rejected, nevertheless, in every-day practice we have constantly to do with processes of pronounced isolation of the so-called „historic space” from the modern „standardization” which, as a final consequence, leads to „musealisation” . The author of the present statement is in full agreement with J. Stankiewicz in his views concerning the need to create some kind of „sanitary barrior” between the „historic space” and that standardized. Taking an a ttitude towards J. Stankiewicz’s postulate rolating to interdesciplinarity required in conservator’s measures the author expresses a view that the protection of historical monuments exists only as a problem or activity and not as an independent scientific discipline since it in itself constitutes a choice of various specializations from both fields — i.e. technical sciences and humanities. In the field conservation are active the representatives of creative disciplines and reflections as to their activ ities arise in the field of art history, those of aesthetics or history of architecture. The so-called conservation activity is a kind of activity from the sphere of culture and art its evaluation, however, will in each separate case have two aspects — i.e. analytical and critical as well. Basing on the above conclusions the author is of opinion that the solution of problem of demarcation between two environments is to be found in the modern creative activity of developing the space as some kind of entity. From this point of view it seems not important to fight against a single standardized multi-storey point block of flats entering the historic space, but to fight fo preservation of the entire spa,ce. This means the end of a certain stage in protection of historical monuments and the advent of now ideas more dialectically handling the reality.

3

Zarys historii ochrony i konserwacji zabytków sztuki ogrodowej w Polsce

62%

Sikora D.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

2016

|

issue 1

105-142

PL

Artykuł ma na celu przybliżenie długiej tradycji zainteresowania dziełami sztuki ogrodowej w Polsce. Początkowo przejawiało się ono w sporządzaniu planów, szkiców i opisów ogrodów, zazwyczaj przy okazji dokumentowania ważnych obiektów architektonicznych, którym towarzyszyły. Z czasem właściciele ogrodów, kierując się szacunkiem dla dokonań swoich poprzedników, zaczęli chronić i konserwować spuściznę wcześniejszych pokoleń. Sztandarowym przykładem poszanowania dla historycznej kompozycji ogrodowej w wieku XVIII było zachowanie, pomimo zmieniającej się mody w sztuce ogrodowej, wilanowskiego kwaterowego ogrodu tarasowego, wiązanego z kultem pierwszego właściciela – Jana III Sobieskiego. W wieku XIX pojawiało się coraz więcej publikacji poświęconych tematyce ogrodowej a wyrosłe na fali romantyzmu zainteresowanie przeszłością spowodowało nasilenie badań naukowych. Artykuł prezentuje ważne etapy w rozwoju metodyki badań i konserwacji zabytków sztuki ogrodowej, przedstawia zasłużonych na tym polu działaczy oraz historię powojennych państwowych instytucji powołanych dla ich ochrony.

EN

The article aims at bringing a long tradition of interest in works of garden art in Poland closer to readers. At first, the interest was manifested in creating plans, sketches and descriptions of gardens, usually while documenting important residential architecture they accompanied. Over time, garden owners, guided by respect to accomplishments of their predecessors, began protecting and preserving the legacy of previous generations. A flagship example of respect for a historic garden composition in the 18th century was the preservation of a terraced garden in Wilanów linked to the cult surrounding its first owner – John III Sobieski, despite changing trends in the garden art. In the 19th century more and more publications dedicated to garden issues began to appear, while interest in the past – rooted in Romanticism – led to the intensification of scientific research. The article presents important stages in the development of methodology of research and preservation of historic gardens, presents distinguished activists in this field and a history of state institutions established for the purpose of protection thereof after the war.

Refine search results

3 Ochrona Zabytków

1 2016

1 1978

1 1975

2 Krzyżanowski L.

1 Billert A.

1 Bogdanowski J.

1 Czerner O.

1 Kalinowski W.

1 Sikora D.

Rada Naukowo-Konserwatorska przy Dyrektorze Naczelnym PP Pracownie Konserwacji Zabytków

Dyskusja nad artykułem J. Stankiewicza

Zarys historii ochrony i konserwacji zabytków sztuki ogrodowej w Polsce