Search results

1

"Blues o Wielkim Ptaku" Kazimierza Świegockiego w perspektywie lektur hermeneutycznych

100%

Skawiński D.

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Poetica

|

2017

|

vol. 5

115-127

PL

Kazimierz Świegocki’s Blues o Wielkim Ptaku from point of view of hermeneutic reading In this article I presented a general assumption of hermeneutics as a theory of literature and a research attitude. I used its various elements in my interpretation of the poem Blues o Wielkim Ptaku of the modern Polish poet, Kazimierz Świegocki. I put the general hypothesis of interpretation and then I verified it by examining the specific elements of the text. I discussed the role of the title and date of creation, the way of speaker’s creation and the lyrical hero, the importance of symbolism and shape of the world presented. I described this poem as referring to issues of cosmogony, ontology, metaphysics and hermeneutics as explaining the order of the universe.

2

Czy w czasach „posthumanistyki” można uprawiać antropologię literatury?

83%

Kłobukowski M.

Studia Norwidiana

|

2012

|

vol. 30

254-267

EN

The author analyzes Kazimierz Świegocki's book with respect to the most important changes in modern humanities – especially to the anthropological turn, that is the literary scholars' interest in the methods of cultural as well as comparative studies. Kłobukowski interprets Świegocki's comparative study on two planes – as an intriguing and sometimes innovative study of great Polish poets who participated in creating the literary tradition of the 19th and 20th centuries, and also as an attempt at building anthropology of literature using modern methods, but also deeply rooted in the philological tradition – based on the concept of subjectivity, whose vision may be reconstructed on the basis of the literary text. The reviewer thinks that the construction of the argument based on juxtaposing two different types of poetical anthropology that may be recognized in Mickiewicz's and Norwid's work is one of Świegocki's most interesting ideas. Świegocki's proposition seems advisable both to those who study Romanticism, and to theoreticians of literature. A vigorous and elegant style of the book makes it also recommendable to students, or even to people who are not “professionally” connected with literature.

3

Czy w czasach „posthumanistyki” można uprawiać antropologię literatury?

83%

Kłobukowski M.

Studia Norwidiana

|

2012

|

vol. 30

254-267

EN

The author analyzes Kazimierz Świegocki’s book with respect to the most important changes in modern humanities – especially to the anthropological turn, that is the literary scholars’ interest in the methods of cultural as well as comparative studies. Kłobukowski interprets Świegocki’s comparative study on two planes – as an intriguing and sometimes innovative study of great Polish poets who participated in creating the literary tradition of the 19th and 20th centuries, and also as an attempt at building anthropology of literature using modern methods, but also deeply rooted in the philological tradition – based on the concept of subjectivity, whose vision may be reconstructed on the basis of the literary text. The reviewer thinks that the construction of the argument based on juxtaposing two different types of poetical anthropology that may be recognized in Mickiewicz’s and Norwid’s work is one of Świegocki’s most interesting ideas. Świegocki’s proposition seems advisable both to those who study Romanticism, and to theoreticians of literature. A vigorous and elegant style of the book makes it also recommendable to students, or even to people who are not “professionally” connected with literature.

Refine search results

2 Studia Norwidiana

1 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Poetica

1 2020

1 2017

1 2012

2 Kłobukowski M.

1 Skawiński D.

"Blues o Wielkim Ptaku" Kazimierza Świegockiego w perspektywie lektur hermeneutycznych

Czy w czasach „posthumanistyki” można uprawiać antropologię literatury?

Czy w czasach „posthumanistyki” można uprawiać antropologię literatury?