Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Kojève
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Problem wolności i myślenia w Heglowskiej Fenomenologii ducha

100%
Jochlik A.
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2021
|
vol. 49
|
issue 1-4
67-93
EN
The goal of the article is to show that in Chapter Four of Phenomenology of Spirit the aim is not to show the servant as the one who becomes independent of nature, but to show his escapism and its consequences. The main point of reference is the “master-slave” dialectic, with a heavy emphasis on Kojève’s interpretation. Apart from this one, the other important points of reference are the very beginning of Chapter Four, as well as Hegel’s understanding of skepticism. The article is organized in such a way that every part focuses on the analysis of at least one crucial quotation, each one constituting a Hegelian attempt to define freedom. It will show that Chapter Four provides us with only the beginning of long considerations on the question of freedom.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Death, Hegel, and Kojève

75%
Inwood M. J.
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
|
2017
|
vol. 1
|
issue 2
68–77
EN
Stemming from a reading of Hegel’s account of the struggle for recognition in the Phenomenology of Spirit, Kojève argued that death is the central notion of Hegel’s philosophy. I will discuss several themes in relation to this claim of Kojève’s interpretation of Hegel, namely the themes of freedom, individuality, and historicity. I will also discuss Kojève’s reading that Hegel rejects both all conceptions of the afterlife, and too the belief in the afterlife as a manifestation of the “unhappy consciousness”. I will point out flaws of Kojève’s interpretation throughout.
3

Arginuzy, Sokrates, Nietzsche, metafizyczny paralelizm i dzienniczek gimnazjalisty

71%
Staniszewski M.
Roczniki Humanistyczne
|
2019
|
vol. 67
|
issue 3: Filologia klasyczna
91-106
PL
Artykuł to krótka analiza rozpoczynającej Dziennik filozofa notatki młodego Aleksandra Kożewnikowa (Kojève’a) poświęconej bitwie pod Arginuzami i procesowi ateńskich dowódców, które to fakty zostały przez Kożewnikowa przedstawione w sposób niezgodny ze źródłami starożytnymi (głównie Ksenofont) i współczesnymi mu badaniami historycznymi; to również próba odnalezienia źródeł tego tekstu, porównanie ze źródłami i badaniami historycznymi, omówienie wcześniejszych interpretacji tej notatki oraz próba zarysowania własnej.
EN
This articles is a short analysis of the first entry in Aleksander Kozhevnikov’s (Kojève) Diary of a Philosopher, dedicated to the battle of Arginusae and subsequent trial of Athenian generals. A great discrepancy between facts – as presented by young Kozhevnikov – and ancient sources and their interpretation in modern scholarship leads to an attempt to find out the contemporary inspiration of this short text, followed by some remarks on previous interpretations of this very first ‘philosophical’ essay of young Kojève.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.