Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  LAWS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

LEGISLATÍVA O LEGISLATÍVE

100%
Balog B.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2016
|
vol. 99
|
issue 3
219 – 233
EN
The state of legal system in Slovakia is subject of long-term criticism, not only by lawyers, but also generally by public, by the addressees of the law. They feel that laws are created in a process that is distant and inaccessible for them. Role of the State is to strengthen citizen ś confidence in law, open the legislative process and make it transparent. In 2015, two laws were adopted relating to the preparation and drafting of laws and parliamentary discussion about proposed laws. The present paper deals with the amendment to the rules of procedure of the Parliament in 2015. It takes note of the changes relating to the publication of the proposed laws and amendments. The paper understands it as a deepening of the Principles of Sovereignty of the People in the activity of the Parliament. The second area is the analysis of Rule prohibiting Amendments that bear no connection with the proposed law, which the paper assesses as a major benefit of the Amendment to the Rules of Procedure of Parliament in 2015.
2

LEGISLATÍVNA OCHRANA KULTÚRNEHO DEDIČSTVA V ČESKOSLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKE V ROKOCH 1918-1939

72%
Orosová M.
Muzeológia a kultúrne dedičstvo
|
2013
|
vol. 1
|
issue 2
19 – 36
EN
This paper analyses laws and regulations governing the protection of cultural heritage (whether original measures or measures inherited from the legal systems of Austria and Hungary) adopted by the Czechoslovak republic in the period between the two world wars. It focuses on laws and regulations in force in Slovakia, comparing them to corresponding measures in national or Czech legal frameworks and finding that the primary purpose of such legislation was to prevent the export of movable cultural artefacts and that the legal framework of protection of cultural heritage in Slovakia was equivalent to that adopted in the Czech lands. In practical terms, however, both frameworks were of ad hoc and provisional nature and remained so until the beginning of the World War II with the lack of political as the main reason for the failure to implement a truly national and comprehensive legal framework of protection of cultural heritage.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.