Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  LEGAL NORMS
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
It is usual to write about law as a system. The systemacity of the law means only a modicum of orderliness and a network of legal norms as basic elements of legal system. There is always a degree of contradiction and/or a tension between legal norms, legal principles and other elements of the legal system. This tension and/or contradiction are characteristic and system creating relationship between elements of Manual system. Legal system is not an axiomatic one for many reasons. It is full of unavailable tensions and contradictions. It is a social normative system determined by society. The elementary unit connecting legal system and social system is legal regulation of great amount of social acts and consequently of social relations, which acquire quality of legal relations. It is also an information (sub) system. Law always strives for an order, but only with a moderate success. It is an open cognitively and operationally open system.
EN
The treatise concerns the moral and ethical problems of teachers. The teachers' competence is described and with it, most importantly, so are the outer abilities and deep philosophical spiritual capacities. The problem of functions which enable didactical and educational success is also discussed. The subject language of ethics is outlined and evaluative, normative as well as descriptive judgments are characterized. In the treatise there are defined: (1) universal values and moral norms of a teacher as a human being, (2) social and cultural values along with ethical norms of a teacher as a social being, (3) doctrinal and legal norms of a teacher as a citizen.
Vojenská história
|
2022
|
vol. 26
|
issue 2
33 - 44
EN
In his scientific study, the author undertook to clarify the issue of duels in Slovakia at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, which was paid little attention in Slovak historiography so far, and only in the perimeter of the officer’s environment. The author has extended the range of attention to civilians as well. On the basis of the analysis of legal norms of the era and the subsequent presentation of duels in the period press, the study provides an interesting insight into the phenomenon of the “duel of honour”, which was already an anachronism at the time, but despite the efforts of the relevant authorities it could not be eradicated. What is valuable is the author’s observation that although the legal norms stipulated relatively severe penalties for duels, the practice at the beginning of the new century was diametrically opposed, with each duel being specific and unique. They were not dominated by killings or serious injuries, and the punishments were also very light, mostly a few days of imprisonment.
Filozofia (Philosophy)
|
2012
|
vol. 67
|
issue 9
718 – 730
EN
The author argues that the distinction between semantic and pragmatic aspects of the language in the statutory instruments is critical to the theory of juristic interpretation. He tries to define the nature of the legal norm, expressed or communicated by the lawgiver by enacting the particular law. Two sorts of pragmatic processes as articulated by M. Zouhar in his book Meaning in context should be taken into account in interpreting the latter: the semantically relevant processes serving the elimination of semantic ambiguities and pragmatic processes participating in making law complete. The aim of the paper is to support the thesis that the elimination of semantic ambiguities means to determine the second layer of the meaning, i.e. the legal norm expressed by the normative utterance in the context of its use by the legislative body. By contrast, making law complete is based on inferring the third layer of meaning, i.e. an implicated legal norm.
EN
The approval of the 431/2002 Accounting Act, particularly § 27, which introduced the term fair value, increased the interest in the topics related to financial securities evaluation among the broad specialized public in Slovak Republic. Besides the above-mentioned 431/2002 Accounting Act, the securities evaluation is treated by another legal norm – Ministry of Justice Statement No. 492 from August 23, 2002 concerning the setting of the general asset value, which is compulsory for the judge experts and others legal norms. The above-mentioned legal norms use different categories concerning securities evaluation issues that moreover differ from the one used by the theory. Besides, the categories are inaccurate, not positive and in some cases even incorrect. Therefore the professional discussion is very important.
EN
In the presented contribution, the author deals with the names of the enactments in terms of related legislative technics and requirements on law-making resulting from the value orientation of the legal system on the rule of law, i.e. particularly the requirements for transparency - a good orientation in law, the requirement of legal certainty and clarity of the law. The author also describes the essentials of the names of the acts of the European Union and associated legislative technique. He speaks critically above a change of names of the legislation as well as changing the names of the acts of the European Union, which makes already difficult orientation in the system of law even more difficult. As a possible way to improve the orientation in the system of law sees electronization of authentic versions of the legislation, which will serve as a legitimate authentic source of law.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.