Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  LINGUISTIC NORM
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

PROBLEMS OF SPELLING AND PRONUNCIATION OF ENGLISH ACRONYMS IN POLISH (Problemy pisowni i wymowy skrotowcow zapozyczonych z jezyka angielskiego)

100%
Przybylska R.
LingVaria : Półrocznik Wydziału Polonistyki UJ poświęcony zagadnieniom języka i językoznawstwa
|
2008
|
issue 2(6)
107-115
EN
The article deals with acronyms that come from English and function in contemporary Polish, spoken and written. The authoress shows the variety of forms and states that their spelling and pronunciation should be in accordance with Polish linguistic norm.
2

Znovu k Vachkově teorii psané formy jazyka

100%
Kodytek V.
Slovo a slovesnost: časopis pro otázky teorie a kultury jazyka (Slovo a slovesnost: A journal for the theory of language and language cultivation)
|
2011
|
vol. 72
|
issue 2
118-129
EN
The key points of Josef Vachek's theory of written language (Vachek, 1939, rev. 1959) can be summarized as follows: (1) Speech and writing are complementary, i.e., for a given communicative situation, one is more convenient than the other. Writing serves, as a rule, more specialized functions (purposes) than speech does, which makes it the marked member of the pair. (2) Writing is (a) governed by a norm of its own (social aspect), and (b) no longer a second-order semiotic system for experienced readers (cognitive aspect). Quite recently, Adam (2009) has criticized Vachek's approach as being old-fashioned and empirically inadequate, and has suggested replacing it with a theory based ‘on the substance only'. The purpose of the present paper is to recall Vachek's theory and to demonstrate that most of Adam's arguments are irrelevant or misleading.
3

Normativity as a value criterion in language care and linguistic counselling

88%
Heltaine-Nagy E.
Magyar Nyelvor (Hungarian Language Guardian)
|
2008
|
vol. 132
|
issue 3
265-278
EN
This paper deals with various theoretical and practical issues from a language educator's and researcher's point of view centred on normativity as a value criterion. The philosophical background is provided by functional and cognitive approaches to language that interpret language use as a body of knowledge and practice handed down from generation to generation in a linguistic community. Relying on such approaches, the authoress discusses the phenomena of normativity and norm changes, as well as standard language norms as a basis of, and a system of conventions for, usual linguistic behaviour still functioning as a pattern of guiding principles. It is against the backdrop of that system of norms that she presents current changes and neologisms at a lexical-semantic level as they occur in the practice of linguistic counselling.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.