Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  MACEDONIAN LANGUAGE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Slavica Slovaca
|
2010
|
vol. 45
|
issue 2
124-128
EN
The political and social changes during the 1999s enabled the establishment of several new Slavic literary languages. This study examines the specific features of codification of the Macedonian language, thanks to which the Macedonian language earned a central position among other Slavic literary languages in a temporal retrospective as well as on the level of content.
Slavica Slovaca
|
2019
|
vol. 54
|
issue 2
172 - 176
EN
This study tries to present the full picture of the presence and acceptance of the work of Blaze Koneski in the Slovak linguistic and literary science. Considering the fact that the complete picture of Koneski‘s character in Slovakia has not been studiously presented so far, the research has gained archival character, since we endeavoured to present the available facts, regarding the elaborated phenomenon as much as possible. As a kind of introduction to the reception of the work of Blaze Koneski‘s creative opus in the Slovak Republic, it should be noted that the Macedonian scholar did not fail to exhibit in his own papers, among other things, his very precise and argumentative views on the history and for the development of the Slovak language. It is particularly important in this domain that the view of Koneski for the Slovak language, namely, is almost always set in correlation or in comparison with the situation and the position of the Macedonian language in the historical context.
EN
The paper is oriented diachronically. It presents the semantic categorical characteristics of the Slavic participium praeteriti passivi (PPP) and their evolution in Polish and in Macedonian through the functional analysis of some periphrastic constructions founded on the base of the PPP. The main subject of the discussion is the diathetical characteristic of the PPP. The analysis leads to the conclusion that PPP (as also some other deverbatives qualified in the frame of the traditional grammatical terminology as participles, i.e. regular members of the verbal system) in particular Slavic languages are subject to different semantic and derivational constraints and, consequently, from the Common Slavic point of view should be treated simply as deverbal adjectives.
EN
The author speaks about two hierarchies defining the scope of the semantic (and morpho-syntactic) variation of a sentence. The first hierarchy operates in the framework of the constitutive proposition. It is the hierarchy of arguments of the given predicate imposed by the selected exponent of that predicate. It is labelled diathetical hierarchy. Diathesis is understood as a semantic category (with partially grammaticalised exponents) responsible for the selection of the morphosyntactic and/or lexical exponent of the predicate and eo ipso for the hierarchy of its arguments as presented in the sentence. Diathetical hierarchy is correlated with the hierarchy of case relationships. Diathetically unmarked sentence is a sentence with the agens / initiator of the action as a referent of the first, nominative, argument. The second hierarchy operates on the sentence as a whole. It is the hierarchy responsible for the topicalization of the sentence. It is pragmatically motivated and is labelled as communicative hierarchy. Its exponents are the intonational line (variations in pitch) of the utterance (in the written text signalized by the punctuation marks) and/or the linear ordering of the semantic components.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.