Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  MISDEMEANOUR
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

K POSTAVENIU SVEDKA V SPRÁVNOM KONANÍ (JE MOŽNÉ V PRIESTUPKOVOM KONANÍ POUŽIŤ AKO DÔKAZNÝ PROSTRIEDOK SVEDECKÚ VÝPOVEĎ POLICAJTA, KTORÝ OBJASŇOVAL PRIESTUPOK?)

100%
Srebalová M.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2016
|
vol. 99
|
issue 2
116 – 137
EN
The article is focused on a witness in administrative proceedings and in generally it deals with the basic principles of the activities of public authorities and in particular the principles and rules of the activities of public administration authorities, carried out by misdemeanour procedure. The theoretical part is based on the characteristics of the rule of law, the principles and rules of the right to good administration and right to a fair trial as well. On this basis, at the very first place, the article is focused on some procedural provisions related to the proceeding on misdemeanours, especially on the documents for a decision, evidences and procedural standing of witnesses. The legislature which encompasses such an administrative offences is represented by the Misdemeanours Act No. 372/1990 Coll. (Act on Misdemeanours) and by Act No. 71/1967 on Administrative Proceedings. The aim of the article is to provide the theoretical analysis of the part of decision-making activities of administrative authorities as well as case law which, in the default of evidence, prefer instead of the rule in dubio pro reo, the use of non-objective evidences. The author pronounced opposition to the conclusions and approaches that are expressed in a large part of administrative decisions and the court decisions, in applying the principle of material truth and the free evaluation of evidence, and points the negative trend in breach of the principle of legality. The reasoning described in the article is also based on the analysis of sub-issues such as non-precise use of terms of law, bias of administration employees, evaluation of evidence and so on. The focus of argumentation to the detriment of using the testimony of a policeman, who clarifies offense, is a crosscutting principle of legality.
2

INTERPRETAČNÉ NEJASNOSTI SÚVISIACE S MOŽNOSTOU UZAVRETIA ZMIERU V PRIESTUPKOVOM KONANÍ (EŠTE JEDEN PRÍSPEVOK DO DISKUSIE)

86%
Tomaš L.
Právny obzor. Teoretický časopis pre otázky štátu a práva (Juridical Review. Theoretical journal for the questions of state and law)
|
2023
|
vol. 106
|
issue 3
251 – 262
EN
Slovak administrative punishment has long lacked comprehensive legal regulation, both from the point of view of substantive law and procedural law. This results in several interpretive ambiguities. One of the ambiguities in question is related to conciliation in misdemeanour proceedings. Some attention has already been paid to the issue of the possibility of conciliation in criminal proceedings in the current scientific literature. Scientific opinions on the possibilities of resolving a misdemeanour case through reconciliation, excluding the offense of defamation according to § 78 of the Act of the Slovak National Council No. 372/1990 Coll. on offenses as amended, are not uniform and differ. The aim of this contribution is to follow up on the currently produced scientific discourse in the subject area, to develop it substantively and ideologically, and to bring arguments in favour of the possibility of amicable disposal of several cases regulated by the tort law of public administration.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.