Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Marian Bielecki
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The review discusses Marian Bielecki’s book on an agonic theory of literary history. The methodological part raises the reviewer’s objections as inspiration with Harold Bloom’s proposals leads in a few instances to a too traditional thought about literary history. By contrast, the interpretive part is considered successful since as based on relations of some writers with Witold Gombrowicz’s works Bielecki convincingly presents the importance of literary agon and creative subjectivity for the dynamics of literary phenomena.
Pamiętnik Literacki
|
2016
|
vol. 107
|
issue 2
246-250
PL
Recenzja omawia książkę Mariana Bieleckiego, której tematem jest szeroko pojmowana „inność” i jej skomplikowane relacje z „tożsamością” rozpatrywane w dziełach Witolda Gombrowicza czy też Mirona Białoszewskiego. Pojęcia, takie jak „abiekt”, „cudzoziemskość”, „kamp” czy „queer” stanowią centrum rozważań Bieleckiego, które badacz traktuje jako synonimy czy też odmiany „inności”.
EN
The review discusses Marian Bielecki’s book, the subject of which is broadly understood “otherness” and its complicated relations with “identity” examined in Witold Gombrowicz’s or Miron Białoszewski’s works. Notions such as “abiect,” “foreigness,” “camp” or “queer” are focal in Bielecki’s considerations, and he treats them as synonyms or variants of “otherness.”
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.