Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Miloslav Kabeláč
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This study yields an analysis of one of the most distinctive compositions from the composer Miloslav Kabeláč (1908–1970) for children’s choir and piano — Blue Sky (1950). One’s attention focuses above all on the vocal sound, on the elemental musical morphology and its impulses, which on the one hand stands the load-bearing constructions of Kabeláč’s compositions (which are built upon continuous planes and musical units), and on the other hand, these elements shape and define each individual song. Kabeláč outlines Hrubín’s verse (from the collection Blue Sky, 1948, which uses pictures from Josef Čapek) through the elemental nature of monorhythmic structures and in a more or less unvarying vocal space. Despite this, however, each song has its own specific traits and pronounced character. The elements of play, which this analysis will attempt to express and within which are found various deep dimensions of Kabeláč’s conception of the work as a whole, are mutually related structures of joking, playful puns through lyrics or vice versa through more dramatic position to a decidedly contemplative position, an expression of the naturalness of the world of children followed by a return to the world of adults.
EN
The topic of our deliberation is resonance as an issue of understanding ourselves and the world, — an understanding that is undoubtedly related to speech. Resonance, as an issue, opened by senses in the world; an issue opening for senses and in the world; resonance as a matter of senses, whose sensorium commune is the body: becoming of the body (the body-becoming), therefore always a question of identity and difference (identifying and identified, marking and marked, differentiating and differentiated). The subject of our deliberation is the undulation that shapes cannot be represented by the shape of the wave or by the sum of individual shapes of the waves (any confirmation, reassuring of My-self in a shape or by a shape is always seriously threatened by the disintegration of Me). So, if Eastern thought says “the shape is empty”, besides the philosopher of being and existence, besides the phenomenologist, besides the metaphysician, besides the philosopher of the body, besides the philosopher of significance, in our reflection we also recognize the philosopher of emptiness.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.