Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  PATENT PROTECTION
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Traditional rules and legal norms do not give sufficient basis for the elimination of doubts and controversy related to the scope of patent protection of biotechnological inventions. The aim of this article is to present: (a) some of the main problems on which the discussion is focused and (b) proposals for their solution. The first of the problems presented concerns the question of the identification of patentable invention in the course of a patent proceeding, with emphasis on the disclosure requirement. The second group consists of problems connected with defining the scope of a monopoly conferred by patent decision. One of the most controversial questions is whether a patent on a biological product gives (and should give) so-called absolute protection or only functional (purposive) limited protection. The next deeply controversial problem is caused by the specific characteristics of biological material - its capability of reproducing itself or being reproduced in a biological system. The question is how far does the patent monopoly extend according to law and how far should it extend? What criteria should be decisive for treating products as covered by the patent monopoly? Showing these problems and controversy against the background of the traditionally established principles of patent law gives the grounds for conclusion that, though biotechnological inventions substantially differ from other inventions, some of these principles - these which mirrored the aim and ethical basis of patent law should be respected also in this new area. The consequence of this opinion is the critical attitude to the observed tendency to extend the scope of patent monopoly beyond that which is justified by common good.
EN
The present economy requires the formation of pro-innovative behaviours, which themselves create conditions required for the effective generation and initiation of one’s own achievements in the scientific-technical realm. The role of the state in the economy and its influence on economic processes undergoes a number of changes in reference to the range and form of influence, and also in the intensity of the influence of public powers on the economy. Realisation of this work requires the ability to use accessible legal and economic instruments in patent policies, which stimulate the development of a country’s creativity and inventiveness. This article strives to analyse how changes in Chinese patent law have influenced patent activity during a period that has seen “three great reforms to patent law in China”. The first part presents the role of patents as the basis for qualifying the mechanisms of influence on innovations and the outline of legislative changes in China. The second part offers an analysis of the profile and range of patent activity there. The conclusions of the article discuss the positive relationship between changes in patent protection and the observed rate of innovations in China, of which an essential element is the observed “patent boom”.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.