Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: PHILOSOPHICAL METHODOLOGY

Sort By:

Limit search:

KIERKEGAARD, PHILOSOPHY, AND AESTHETICISM

100%

Turnbull J.

Filozofia (Philosophy)

2013

vol. 68

issue 1

50 – 61

Beginning with a consideration of one of the central methodological issues in contemporary Kierkegaard scholarship, this paper goes on to suggest that the tradition of reading Kierkegaard as a philosopher, or in the terms of philosophy, is a tradition of aestheticism. Calling upon the distinguishing features of the aesthete found in the work of Anthony Rudd and Patrick Stokes, the author argues that the tradition of reading Kierkegaard as a philosopher has these same features; and so can be said to be a tradition of aestheticism. The paper goes on to make this case in detail with respect to Rudd’s book Kierkegaard and the Limits of the Ethical and Stokes’ Kierkegaard’s Mirrors.

NIETZSCHE AND THE RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ART AND SCIENCE: A QUESTION OF PHILOSOPHICAL METHODOLOGY

86%

Doyle T.

Filozofia (Philosophy)

2016

vol. 71

issue 10

858 – 868

In this paper, the author argues that despite various differences in his philosophical thinking from early to late, Nietzsche’s reflections on the relationship between art and science forms a thread of continuity in his thought, which sees him ultimately committed to the possibility of truth and knowledge. Moreover, the author argues that although he is not committed to it throughout his writings, consideration of the continuous character of Nietzsche’s thinking on the relation between art and science from an epistemic point of view helps us to make sense of the specific methodology that informs his proposal of the metaphysics of the will to power.

Refine search results

2 Filozofia (Philosophy)

1 Doyle T.

1 Turnbull J.

1 2016

1 2013

Search results

KIERKEGAARD, PHILOSOPHY, AND AESTHETICISM

NIETZSCHE AND THE RECIPROCAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ART AND SCIENCE: A QUESTION OF PHILOSOPHICAL METHODOLOGY