The first part of this paper provides a bird's eye view of the early stages of the story of the notion of 'phoneme' from Saussure and Baudouin de Courtenay, via Trubetzkoy, up to the American descriptivists. The second part discusses three major components of that notion: the idea that phonemes are indivisible primitive units of phonological representation, the concept of contrast, as well as segmental organisation in general, reviewing various portions of recent literature arguing against each component in turn. Specifically, it is pointed out that (1) in present-day phonology, the basic units of phonological representations are features, and phonemes are only used as shorthand for bundles of distinctive features; (2) the presence vs. absence of contrast is not a matter of all-or-nothing in a number of cases; there are cases in which two sequences are not phonologically identical but not distinct, either; consequently, phonological descriptions cannot be exclusively based on segmental transcriptions; and (3) phonetic transcription suggests that speech consists of speech sounds - a claim that is obviously false phonetically; but even a sizeable portion of the phonological literature claims that phonological analysis is to be conducted in a nonsegmental (and rule-free) fashion.
The analysis deals with typologically relevant phenomena on phonological level of the Upper Sorbian and Lower Sorbian languages. Both standard languages (and standard Polish) belong to the extreme consonantal type with undeveloped vocalism (7 vowels) and developed consonantism (32, 35 consonants). The standard Slovak represents a transient type between extreme vocalic and extreme consonantal types because the proportion of vowels (15) and consonants (27) is relatively balanced.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.