Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  POLITICAL SCIENCES
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In recent years, political science as a discipline was described very negatively in the views of political elites, media and society. Despite the fact that the their position in modern democratic societies went hand in hand with the word trends of political sciences in common, we are able to observed differences within the interpretation, the methodology, or in the context of scientific papers and publications. The main aim of the article is to analyse selected political journals in Slovakia in the context of their establishment in the international databases, in context of their thematic target and in the diversity in relation to the expertise of authors.
2
Content available remote

Definicja korupcji w nauce prawa administracyjnego

100%
EN
The notion of corruption is studied mainly by political sciences, by sociology, including the sociology of law, by economic sciences, history and anthropology. So it seems to be an interdisciplinary issue that opens one field to the achievements of another. However, according to the author of the article, legal definitions of corruption, also those developed by various fields of law, should not be directly applied for describing this issue in administrative law since they have been formulated to meet the needs of specific legal acts and their objectives. The article is an attempt to distinguish the basic characteristics of corruption so that they meet the needs of administrative law. In her article, the author does not analyse normative acts, but achievements of social and legal sciences, including those in the field of administrative law.
Communication Today
|
2014
|
vol. 5
|
issue 2
66–79
EN
Social media are becoming increasingly important tools of political communication which makes them the subject-matter of study of political sciences – not only in borderline disciplines such as political marketing or political communication, but also in political sciences and international relations. Existing expert publications mainly focus on surveying traditional media and usually do not reflect the reality of the continuously growing influence of social media; however, they tend to pay attention predominantly to the distinctiveness of the media space. The purpose of the article is to contribute to the discussion about methodology distinctions and even counter positions of such surveys through comparison with methods of surveying traditional media. Every contemporary researcher must cope with the largest amount of – relatively easily available – sources in the history of mankind. Online environment is characterised by high degree of innovativeness related to the process of continuous transformation; compared to traditional media, the content of social media is unstable and it is necessary to put much higher demands on the context of online contents and relevancy of information sources. The study points out methodology risks that should be reflected mainly in the preparatory stage of surveys, e.g. when determining the selection sample, construction of categories of the content, or media, which are to be surveyed, as well as the setting of coding system. Due to the abundance of various content types, it is getting increasingly difficult to distinguish the relevant from the trivial. It requires much more intensive preparation of the researcher who must be aware of different environments and understand the methodology of differences surveyed by the study.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.