Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Paul-Henri Spaak
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
PL
Paul-Henri Spaak słusznie zaliczany jest w poczet tzw. europejskich „ojców założycieli”. Po upadku projektu Europejskiej Wspólnoty Obronnej stał się on pomysłodawcą nowych i zwieńczonych sukcesem inicjatyw. Rozwinął bliską współpracę z J. Monnetem i J.W. Beyenem. W pełni zasługuje on na miano ojca Traktatów Rzymskich, szczególnie zaś Traktatu o EWG. Spaak był głęboko przekonany o zasadności współpracy międzynarodowej. Jej efektywność wymagała jednak ograniczenia suwerenności. Termin „ponadnarodowy” miał dla niego inne znaczenie niż dla J. Monneta. Pogląd Spaaka bliższy był opinii R. Schumana i K. Adenauera. Nie zrezygnował on z idei organu ponadnarodowego, lecz jego model wspólnotowy nie musiał obejmować potężnej i dominującej instytucji ponadnarodowej. „Ponadnarodowość” oznaczała dlań większościowy tryb podejmowania decyzji. Spaak, podobnie jako K. Adenauer, uznał ostatecznie wyższość schematu integracji horyzontalnej (ogólnej). Ostatecznym celem jego wysiłków była federacja. Posiadałaby ona rozległe uprawnienia w sferze stosunków zewnętrznych, bezpieczeństwa militarnego oraz polityk ekonomicznych. Nie miała jednak doprowadzić do zaniku państw. Wspólnota Gospodarcza wraz z różnymi
EN
Paul Henri Spaak is rightly counted among the European Founding Fathers. After a debacle of the European Defense Community project (30 August 1954) it was Spaak who became a fruitful source of new and efficient initiatives. He closely collaborated with J. Monnet and J.W. Beyen but formulation of a new model of community structure was his own achievement. Thereby Spaa k fully deserves the name of the father of the Treaties of Rome, especially of the European Economic Community. Spaak was deeply convinced about the validity of international cooperation. Its efficiency required limitation of sovereignty. Yet Spaak represe nted a different understanding of the term “ supranational ” than Monnet. His view was closer to R. Schuman ’ s and K. Adenauer ’ s. He did not abandon the idea of a supranational organ but the community model did not have to comprise a powerful and dominating s upranational institution. For him “ supranationality ” meant a majority mode of decisions - making. Due to such an assumption an organ comprising representatives of national governments could be recognized as supranational. Another modification referred to the scope of community remit. Spaak, just like K. Adenuer, eventually “ converted ” to a horizontal, i.e. comprehensive model. As to the final goal, he wished to create a federation. It should be broadly empowered in matters of foreign relations, military secur ity and economic policies. Yet states would not disappear. The EEC and various forms of intergovernmental cooperation in the political sphere were measures serving the attainment of the goal.
2
100%
EN
Paul Henri Spaak is rightly counted among the European Founding Fathers. After a debacle of the European Defense Community project (30 August 1954) it was Spaak who became a fruitful source of new and efficient initiatives. He closely collaborated with J. Monnet and J.W. Beyen but formulation of a new model of community structure was his own achievement. Thereby Spaak fully deserves the name of the father of the Treaties of Rome, especially of the European Economic Community. Spaak was deeply convinced about the validity of international cooperation. Its efficiency required limitation of sovereignty. Yet Spaak represented a different understanding of the term “supranational” than Monnet. His view was closer to R. Schuman’s and K. Adenauer’s. He did not abandon the idea of a supranational organ but the community model did not have to comprise a powerful and dominating supranational institution. For him “supranationality” meant a majority mode of decisions-making. Due to such an assumption an organ comprising representatives of national governments could be recognized as supranational. Another modification referred to the scope of community remit. Spaak, just like K. Adenuer, eventually “converted” to a horizontal, i.e. comprehensive model. As to the final goal, he wished to create a federation. It should be broadly empowered in matters of foreign relations, military security and economic policies. Yet states would not disappear. The EEC and various forms of intergovernmental cooperation in the political sphere were measures serving the attainment of the goal.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.