Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Peter’s primacy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Sources for the Textual Commentary of the 1593 Jakub Wujek’s New Testament Translation. Study of Acts 2:14–36

100%
Nicko­-Stępień P.
Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce
|
2017
|
vol. 61
PL
The purpose of the article is to indicate sources for the textual commentary of the 1593 Jakub Wujek’s New Testament translation. This issue will be shown by the example of Acts 2:14–36. In his translation work, the Jesuit used the 1582 Rheims New Testament in English and a Latin commentary by Robert Bellarmine entitled Disputationes Christianae Fidei. The problem of sources for the Wujek’s New Testament translation was until now almost completely unresearched or researched erroneously. However, the collation of Wujek’s commentary with the commentaries from Bellamine’s work and the Rheims New Testament led to surprising results: Jakub Wujek, one of the most distinguished sixteenth-century biblical translators, most probably knew English and his textual commentary on the 1593 New Testament is a compilation of texts of the two above-mentioned works. This means that as a commentator Wujek was largely reproductive and dependent on sources and he did not use the works of the Church Fathers directly, but quoted passages from the already existing compendia.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Źródła dla komentarza tekstowego Nowego Testamentu w tłumaczeniu Jakuba Wujka z roku 1593. Studium Dz 2, 14–36

67%
Nicko-Stępień P.
Odrodzenie i Reformacja w Polsce
|
2017
|
vol. 61
PL
Celem artykułu jest wskazanie źródeł dla komentarza tekstowego Nowego Testamentu w tłumaczeniu Jakuba Wujka z 1593 r. Zagadnienie zostanie przedstawione na przykładzie Dz 2, 14–36. Jezuita w pracy translatorskiej posłużył się angielskim Nowym Testamentem z Rheims z 1582 r. i łacińskim komentarzem Roberta Bellarmina pt. Disputationes Christianae Fidei. Kwestia źródeł dla Nowego Testamentu w tłumaczeniu Wujka była do tej pory niemal zupełnie niezbadana albo rozpoznana błędnie. Tymczasem zestawienie komentarza Wujkowego z komentarzami z dzieła Bellarmina i Nowym Testamentem z Rheims doprowadziło do zaskakujących rezultatów: Jakub Wujek, jeden z najwybitniejszych tłumaczy biblijnych XVI w., najprawdopodobniej znał język angielski, a jego komentarz tekstowy do Nowego Testamentu z 1593 r. stanowi kompilację tekstów dwóch wyżej wymienionych dzieł. To oznacza, że jako komentator Wujek był w ogromnym stopniu odtwórczy i zależny od źródeł, i nie korzystał bezpośrednio z dzieł Ojców Kościoła, ale cytował ich fragmenty z gotowych już kompendiów. The purpose of the study is to indicate the sources for a textual commentary to the New Testament in Jakub Wujek’s translation of 1593. The problem is presented on the example of the Acts 2:14–36. The Jesuit in his translatory work used the English Rheims New Testament of 1582, and Robert Bellarmine’s Latin commentary entitled Disputationes Christianae Fidei. The question of sources for the New Testament in Jakub Wujek’s translation has been almost completely unexplored or explored incorrectly. A comparative analysis of Wujek’s commentary with that of Bellarmine’s and of the Rheims New Testament has led to surprising conclusions: that Jakub Wujek, one of the most outstanding Bible translators in the sixteenth century, probably knew English, and his textual commentary to the New Testament of 1593 is a compilation of the two abovementioned texts. This means that as a Bible commentator Wujek was imitative and dependent on secondary sources, as he did not use texts by Church Fathers, but relied on quotations from their writings he found in other compendia.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Synteza teologiczna nauki o prymacie papieskim i misja Następcy Piotra w służbie prawdy w pismach J. Ratzingera/Benedykta XVI

67%
Bartocha W.
Łódzkie Studia Teologiczne
|
2019
|
vol. 28
|
issue 2
99-116
EN
The aim of this article is to present the main lines of the primacy theology as presented by Joseph Ratzinger (Pope Benedict XVI) and its significance in an ecumenical dialogue. Ratzinger, following Catholic ecclesiology, points out that the bishop of Rome carries out the task which was entrusted to Peter by Jesus. Referring to the biblical sources, he researches Peter’s place in all New Testament writings and analyses texts describing his mission. Quoting the arguments from the Bible supporting Christ's origin of Peter’s prerogatives in the area of leading and directing the Church, Ratzinger argues that Peter’s primacy has its Biblical roots and comes from God. The Bavarian theologian points out a personal character of the primacy, thus assessing that the foundation of the Church is both the person and the statement of faith, whose subject is the person. Ratzinger presents the papal office in relation to the Passion of Christ so the Peter’s primacy has a testimonial structure and is related to matryrology through following. The essence of Papacy’s message includes witnessing about Jesus Christ and His salvific message. Thus, the primacy always witnesses about a relationship of the Church with Christ, legitimizes and strengthens it. Stressing a personal character of the primacy, which is expressed in the attitude of being “on the way with Jesus” in the perspective of the Passion and the Cross, we can conclude that authenticity and authority of Christianity takes place not through law, norms and rules but through the miracle of the person of the Church Shepherd, who is responsible for the faith purity and Church unity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.