Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 12

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Piotr
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Postać Piotra w Ewangelii św. Mateusza

100%
Paciorek A.
Vox Patrum
|
2004
|
vol. 46
7-17
EN
The author of this work tries to answer the question: „what picture of St. Peter is showed by the first Gospel?". It appears that the figure of St. Peter is not changed meaningly in texts taking over from Mark's version (4,18; 8 ,14nn; 6, 18; 16, 23; 17, 1-8; 26, 33; 26, 69-75) by Matthew. Meaning of describing events is the same in both cases though a little changes emphasizes the role of Apostles' Prince. In the other hand, missing by Matthew Mark's texts about Peter (Mk 1, 36; 5, 37; 13, 3; 16, 7) is not the trial of decreasing the role of St. Peter. There are three novelty Matthew's texts in view of St. Peter's person. These texts don't run parallel to synoptics' words. There are: going to Jesus on the water (14, 28-31), confession somewhere Caesarea Philippi way (16, 16-19) and the matter of temple taxes (17, 24-27). The most suggestive is the person of St. Peter in the fundamental! texts for Matthew Mt 16, 17-19. It is obvious that meaning and priority of St. Peter comes down from earth activity of Jesus.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pozycja Piotra w tekstach gnostyckich

100%
Zmorzanka A. Z.
Vox Patrum
|
2004
|
vol. 46
79-86
FR
Dans le present article l'auteure fait l'analyse de sept ouvrages dans lesquels apparait le personnage de Pierre. Ces ouvrages peuvent etre repartis en trois groupes. Dans le premier groupe Pierre est presente en tant qu'auditeur de l'enseignement de Jesus/Sauveur. Dans te deuxieme il est presenté en tant que temoin du mystere. Dans le troisieme en tant que dirigeant d'une communaute (gnostique). Dans la conclusion, on fait observer qu'il existait chez les gnostiques un courant faisant appel a l'autorite de Pierre comme membre de l'église des Parfaits/Choisis et en tant que temoin de la revelation secrete du Sauveur. Ce courant se referait aussi a la tradition de Matthieu.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Św. Piotr biskupem Rzymu?

100%
Pałucki J.
Vox Patrum
|
2008
|
vol. 52
|
issue 2
819-826
EN
The primacy of the Bishop of Rome is an essential, if not a fundamental element of the unity of Church and belongs to the mainstream of ecclesiology throughout its whole history. It is anchored in the study of the doctrine of the New Testament and from the very beginning, starting from the oldest patristic sources, such as the Epistle of Saint Clement of Rome to Corinthians and Ignatius of Antioch’s Epistles, there have been utterances indicating Saint Peters extraordinary role in the universal Church and the significance of his stay in Rome and the foundation of the local Christian community there. The Church Fathers also emphasize that Peter is present in all fundamental events related to the foundation of the Church and it was him who was entrusted with the care for its unity by Jesus. The first writers who start to describe Peter as the Bishop of Rome are Tertullian and Cyprian, who teaches that the Bishop’s authority is like the Apostles’ authority and uses the term cathedra Petri referring to Rome. Although Saint Irenaeus attributes the foundation of the Roman Church to Peter and Paul, in the course of years, especially after the transfer of the Capital of the Empire to Constantinople, he also puts the name of Peter at the top of the list of Roman Bishops. Many biblical scholars and patrologists also emphasize that Paul never laid claim to be the Bishop of Rome.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wkład Janowego ucznia w IV Ewangelię

75%
Gryglewicz F.
The Biblical Annals
|
1983
|
vol. 30
|
issue 1
77-83
PL
Die Erzählung über die Offenbarung Jesu Christi am See Genezareth (J 21) berührt die Sachen der ganzen Kirche. Der Fischfang zeigt auf viele aus verschiedenen Nationen stammende Gläubigen. Die Hervorhebung der übergeordneten Rolle Petrus’ in der Kirche durch den Autor, dem es an der Betonung der Bedeutung Johannes des Evangelisten gelegen sein sollte, lässt feststellen, dass er viele Kirchengemeinden kannte und wusste, dass sie alle Christi gehören. Er kannte auch Doktrin, die sie bekannten, er kannte den nur ihnen eigentümlichen Wortschatz, und sogar unbeträchtliche Abweichungen im Inhalt. Er selbst unterzeichnete den Aufbau der Kirche, was Johannes nicht für wichtig hielt, und die gegenwärtige Eschatologie von Johannes versuchte er um die zukunftige in anderen Kirchengemeinden beliebte Eschatologie zu ergänzen. Als Ganzes strebte der Autor von J 21 nach der Einheit von allen Bekennern Christi.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Modlitwa Jezusa i Kościoła za Piotra (Łk 22,31-32)

75%
Oktaba P.
Verbum Vitae
|
2004
|
vol. 6
129-145
PL
The undertaken analysis of Lk 22,31-32 (in relation to Lk 9,28-36 and Acts 12,1-17) allowed us to perceive Peter, who is an example of intercessory prayer, meaning the unceasing and effective prayer of Christ for him (and all of his successors). This prayer, joined with the prayer of the Church, saves Peter (as well as every Christian), assists in his conversion and brings him back to the community. Peter felt the prayers of Christ and the Church, he gave witness to it, and in this way strengthened the faith of his brothers. Peter is a clear sign of the presence of Jesus in the Church the strength of His intercessory prayer.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Pozycja św. Piotra w pismach Afrahata i św. Efrema

63%
Uciecha A.
Vox Patrum
|
2004
|
vol. 46
145-154
FR
L'auteur de cet article releve le probleme peu elaboré dans la litterature patristique d'aujourd'hui. Il s'agit d'une reflexion sur le sujet de la position de saint Pierre dans les ceuvres d'Aphrahat le Sagę Persan et de saint Ephrem le Syrien. Une courte analyse de ce théme nous permet de constater d'abord que les résultats des recherches d'autrefoi dévoilent Finfluence d'une tendance apologétique trés forte. Dans leurs commentaires des paraboles et des images biblique Aphrahat et Ephrem scrutent les motifs de la vocation et les devoirs de la responsabilité de Pierre. Il en resulte que sa position particuliere, disons primat, parmi les Apótres ne concerne que sa persone.
EN
L'auteur de cet article releve le probleme peu elaboré dans la litterature patristique d'aujourd'hui. Il s'agit d'une reflexion sur le sujet de la position de saint Pierre dans les ceuvres d'Aphrahat le Sage Persan et de saint Ephrem le Syrien. Une courte analyse de ce théme nous permet de constater d'abord que les résultats des recherches d'autrefoi dévoilent l'influence d'une tendance apologétique trés forte. Dans leurs commentaires des paraboles et des images biblique Aphrahat et Ephrem scrutent les motifs de la vocation et les devoirs de la responsabilité de Pierre. Il en resulte que sa position particuliere, disons primat, parmi les Apotres ne concerne que sa persone.
7
Content available remote

Prymat papieża według kan. 331 Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego z 1983 roku

63%
Brinda Š.
Kościół i Prawo
|
2019
|
issue 8 (21) nr 2
9-29
PL
Kościół katolicki jest organiczną wspólnotą wszystkich wiernych chrześcijan z woli Jezusa Chrystusa. W tej organicznej wspólnocie każdy wierzący ma swoje miejsce i funkcje. Funkcje wiernych występują jako indywidualne i kolegialne, i są ściśle ze sobą połączone. Indywidualną funkcją w Kościele jest urząd papieża. Tak jak Apostoł Piotr został wybrany przez samego Chrystusa na pierwszego wśród Apostołów, tak i dziś papież jest głową Kolegium Biskupów. Papież, Biskup Rzymu, jest pierwszym następcą Apostoła Piotra, głową Kolegium Biskupów, zastępcą Chrystusa na ziemi i pasterzem całego Kościoła. Na mocy swego urzędu ma w Kościele najwyższą, pełną, bezpośrednią, powszechną i zwyczajną władzę, którą może swobodnie wykonywać. Jego władza jest najwyższą władzą rządzenia i obejmuje władzę ustawodawczą, wykonawczą i sądowniczą.
EN
The Catholic Church is an organic community of the Christian faithful who believe in Jesus Christ. Everyone has his place and functions in the Church. The functions of the faithful appear as individual and collegial, and are closely related together. The Pope’s office is an individual function in the Church. Like the Apostle Peter, he was chosen by Christ himself as the first of the Apostles, and so is the Pope today, he is the head of the college of bishops. The Pope, Roman Pontiff is the first successor of the Apostle Peter, the Vicar of Christ, and the pastor of the universal Church on earth. By virtue of his office he possesses supreme, full, immediate, and universal ordinary power in the Church, which he is always able to exercise freely. His authority is the supreme and it consists of legislative, executive and judicial one.
8
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kolegium biskupów w "Konstytucjach apostolskich". Rola Piotra

63%
Żelazny J. W.
Vox Patrum
|
2004
|
vol. 46
249-254
IT
Le Costituzioni apostoliche presentano uno dei documenti motto significativi per ta Chiesa net IV secoto, ma anzitutto ta testimonianza det tempo passato. La Chiesa, come é presentata net tibro, e una struttura cottegiate, non esiste nesun primato ne personate nś ufficiate. Nell'asembtea partano e discutano tutti i fedeti, anche prendendo te decisioni definitive. Si puó dire: E presente Piętro, ma non Micio di Piefro. I fedeti sono chiamati att'obedienza at vescovo che e indipendente in tutte te sue decisioni net suo territorio fuorche te situazioni in cui e Pautore di uno scandato e quindi viene sottoposto atte decisioni det sinodo detta propria provincia. Si puó trovare una gerarchia netPasembtea ma non e una gerarchia ufficiate; si puó dire che questa gerarchia e di stampo pratico non teotogico. Autorita di Trndizione Apostolica ha it carattere costitutivo per tutti i fedeti. La Chiesa nelle Costituzioni e ta Chiesa degti Apostoti, non di Pietro.
EN
Le "Costituzioni apostoliche" presentano uno dei documenti motto significativi per ta Chiesa nel IV secolo, ma anzitutto la testimonianza del tempo passato. La Chiesa, come é presentata net libro, e una struttura collegiale, non esiste nesun primato ne personale ne ufficiale. Nell'asemblea parlano e discutano tutti i fedeli, anche prendendo le decisioni definitive. Si puó dire: E presente Pietro, ma non "ufficio di Pietro". I fedeli sono chiamati all'obedienza al vescovo che e indipendente in tutte le sue decisioni nel suo territorio fuorche le situazioni in cui e l'autore di uno scandalo e quindi viene sottoposto alle decisioni del sinodo della propria provincia. Si puó trovare una gerarchia nell'asemblea ma non e una gerarchia ufficiale; si puó dire che questa gerarchia e di stampo pratico non teologico. Autorita di "Tradizione Apostolica" ha il carattere costitutivo per tutti i fedeli. La Chiesa nelle "Costituzioni" e la Chiesa degli Apostoli, non di Pietro.
9
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Znaczenie "Petra" (Mt 16, 18) w interpretacji świętego Augustyna

51%
Eckmann A.
Vox Patrum
|
2006
|
vol. 49
167-178
EN
Ex analysi operum Sancti Augustini evenit, ut terminus petra varias significationes acceperit, quae sunt: Christus, Petrus, Ecclesia, fides et gratia. Petra Petrum et eius fidem significat. Super hanc fidem Petri Christus Ecclesiam suam aedificat, quam portae inferi non vincent.
10
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Najstarsze przedstawienia Piotra Apostoła a problem prymatu papieskiego

51%
Iwaszkiewicz-Wronikowska B.
Vox Patrum
|
2004
|
vol. 46
391-404
EN
The article, which is contained with two parts, treats of the eldest iconography of St. Peter in relation to papal primacy. The author of this article reliances on this iconography and proves that this primacy concerned not only St. Peter but also St. Paul because both of them were founders of Roman Church.
11
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Spotkanie św. Pawła z przemienionym Jezusem pod Damaszkiem a przemienienie Jezusa na górze

45%
Dzik M.
Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny
|
2009
|
vol. 62
|
issue 2
EN
The article describes a possible connection between the transfiguration of Jesus and the meeting of St. Paul with the glorified Jesus at Damascus.  The article is divided into two parts. In the first part the author tries to find the main common elements between the two stories. He accounts for them: three versions of each story, the main characters of each story and the similar courses of each story. In the second part the author compares the terminology of each Gospel pericope with the terminology of each Acts pericope. He states that in each pair there are very important identical words such as: VIhsou/j, fwnh,, avkou,w, le,gw. In the pairs: Mat 17, 1–8 and the Act 9, 3–9; Mat 17, 1–8 and Act 22, 6–11; Mat 17, 1–8 Act 26, 12–18 even more identical and important words can be found. It allows the author to come to the conclusion that the story about the transfiguration of Jesus and the meeting of St. Paul with the glorified Jesus at Damascus are harmonized. It is probably done to prove that St. Paul is an apostle because he saw the transfigured (glorified) Jesus as did St. Peter (and the other apostles).
PL
The article describes a possible connection between the transfiguration of Jesus and the meeting of St. Paul with the glorified Jesus at Damascus. The article is divided into two parts. In the first part, the author tries to find the main common elements between the two stories. He accounts for them: three versions of each story, the main characters of each story and the similar courses of each story. In the second part, the author compares the terminology of each Gospel pericope with the terminology of each Acts pericope. He states that in each pair there are very important identical words such as Ἰησοῦς, φωνή, ἀκούώ λέγω. In the pairs: Mat 17, 1–8 and the Act 9, 3–9; Mat 17, 1–8 and Act 22, 6–11; Mat 17, 1–8 Act 26, 12–18 even more identical and important words can be found. It allows the author to come to the conclusion that the story of the transfiguration of Jesus and the meeting of St. Paul with the glorified Jesus at Damascus are harmonized. It is probably done to prove that St. Paul is an apostle because he saw the transfigured (glorified) Jesus as did St. Peter (and the other apostles).
12
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Il senso cristologico-ecclesiologico dell’ammonizione rivolta a Pietro da Gesù (Mt 16, 23/Mc 8, 33)

45%
Borto P.
Roczniki Teologii Fundamentalnej i Religiologii
|
2012
|
vol. 4
51-69
EN
The synoptic Gospel tradition of Matthew and Mark has passed on harsh words which Jesus addressed at Peter (Mt 16: 23 and Mk 8: 33). The First of the Apostles was reprimanded soon after he had professed his faith. Such a context as well as the overtone of Jesus’ words make them an interesting pericope both for exegesis and theology, allowing a theologian to draw important conclusions for Christology and Ecclesiology. Indeed, this moment of the Gospel more distinctly reveals the Christ mystery as well as the mystery of what it means to be his disciple. Therefore there is “something more” revealed about Christ himself as well as “something more” about the Church as the community of Jesus’ disciples. In this paper, the author analyzes the meaning of the admonition. In order to do it, he discusses the sense of Jesus’ words in the contexts of both Matthew and Mark, pointing to similarities and differences between their accounts. He also proposes a new translation of the analyzed words, different from the commonly accepted one. Finally, the author presents his most important conclusions and questions arising when reading the aforementioned pericopes, as well as their christological and ecclesiological consequences.
PL
Chrystologiczno-eklezjologiczne znaczenie napomnienia skierowanego przez Jezusa do Piotra (Mt 16, 23/Mk 8, 33) Tradycja ewangeliczna dwóch Ewangelii synoptycznych (wg Mateusza i Marka) przekazała ostre napomnienie Jezusa, z którym zwrócił sie On do Piotra (por. Mt 16, 23/Mk 8, 33). Napomnienie to zostało skierowane do Pierwszego z Apostołów zaraz po jego wyznaniu wiary. Tak kontekst, jak również ton tych słów czyni z nich interesujący fragment zarówno dla refleksji o charakterze egzegetycznym, jak również teologicznym pozwalając wyciągnąć znaczące wnioski o charakterze chrystologiczno-eklezjologicznym. Można bowiem powiedzieć, że właśnie w tym momencie w wyraźniejszy sposób zostaje objawiona tajemnica Chrystusa i zarazem tajemnica bycia Jego uczniem, a więc zostało objawione coś „więcej” o samym Chrystusie i coś „więcej” o Kościele jako wspólnocie Jego uczniów. W niniejszym artykule autor podejmuje sie analizy znaczenia tego napomnienia. W tym celu omawia znaczenie słów Jezusa w kontekście każdej ze wspomnianych Ewangelii. Kontekst ten wskazuje, że chodzi tu przede wszystkim o objawieniowy wymiar tej perykopy. Następnie, powołując sie na argumenty o charakterze gramatycznym, kontekstualnym i opinie innych autorów, autor niniejszego artykułu proponuje inne tłumaczenie napomnienia Jezusa niż to przyjmowane powszechnie - takie, w którym wybrzmiewa nakaz pokornego kroczenia za Chrystusem aż po krzyż, a nie takie, które nakazuje Piotrowi po prostu oddalić się. Wyżej wskazana interpretacja omawianego fragmentu pozwala wyciągnąć wnioski tak o charakterze chrystologicznym, jak i eklezjologicznym. Do pierwszych nalepy zaliczyć wskazanie, że tajemnica Chrystusa zostaje w pełni objawiona dopiero wraz z wydarzeniem paschalnym, gdy „wszystko sie wypełniło”. Ściśle powiązany jest z tym wniosek o charakterze eklezjologicznym, w którym autor wskazuje, że uczeń Chrystusa, reprezentowany w osobie Piotra, może otworzyć sie na pełnie tego objawienia tylko w wiernym podążaniu za Panem aż po misterium krzyża i po udział w nim. Powyższa interpretacja omawianego tekstu stawia również pytania o charakterze chrystologicznym i eklezjologicznym, na które tekst ewangeliczny nie odpowiada, lecz które trzeba określić inspirującymi dla refleksji teologicznej: w jakim sensie tajemnica Paschy objawia „coś więcej” z tajemnicy Chrystusa? Na czym polega ten krok, który uczeń Jezusa winien zrobić, by pójść za Nim do końca? Dlaczego pełnia tajemnicy Chrystusa nie jest dostępną bez „wejścia” z Nim w tajemnice Paschy?
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.