Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Porphyry
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Philosopher’s Diet in Porphyry’s De Abstinentia: Characterizing a Historical Legacy of Minimalism in Food Consumption

100%
Gamlath I.
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
|
2021
|
vol. 31
|
issue 2
43-58
EN
Historical legacy, as an important constituent for the evaluation of the extent to which the past influences the present, sheds much light on some of the broader issues of the relation between the past and the present. One of the components of historical legacy is human food consumption habits. The domain of food consumption habits, in traditional Greek and Roman culture, contains a fairly noticeable diversity as it fluctuates between what seems to be two wide poles of dietary practices such as a simple diet, with the focus on minimalism and health and a luxury diet, with the focus on excess and extravagance. These poles, upon close analysis, have determined the dietary customs of antiquity while also formed a gastronomic identity. The impact of this historical legacy seems to have not only flavored Porphyry’s discussion of the nature of the philosopher’s diet in On Abstinence from Killing Animals but has also served in characterizing an advanced stage of minimalism in Greek and Roman food consumption habits.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Recenzja książki: Porfiriusz z Tyru O wegetarianizmie (Περὶ ἀποχῆς ἐμψúχων), wprowadzenie, przekład i komentarz Ewa Osek, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Sub Lupa, Warszawa 2018, ss. 460

100%
Czerwińska J.
Collectanea Philologica
|
2018
|
issue 21
153-158
EN
This is the first Polish translation of Porphyry’s of Tyre text done by Ewa Osek. Except for the translation, the book contains the Greek text, a comprehensive introduction to the content of the work, a description of manuscripts and editions, as well as extensive and comprehensive comments on the translated text. Appendix and indexes are also included in the book.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Training of Porphyry’s ‘Athlete’: The Ascetic Philosopher in On the Abstinence from Eating Flesh.

65%
Gamlath I.
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
|
2018
|
vol. 28
|
issue 1
PL
The image of the historical athlete who enters the ancient Greek stadium is a perfect medium for clarifying the conceptual philosopher’s liberation from material bonds and ascent to the higher causal order in Porphyry’s On the Abstinence from Eating Flesh. The image is emphasized when Porphyry prescribes the practice of vegetarianism and immaterial sacrifice for the conceptual philosopher’s preparation for the specific ‘contest’of freeing from material concerns such as food and sacrifice and eventual transformation in to the as the priest of the Highest God.
EN
The image of the historical athlete who enters the ancient Greek stadium is a perfect medium for clarifying the conceptual philosopher’s liberation from material bonds and ascent to the higher causal order in Porphyry’s On the Abstinence from Eating Flesh. The image is emphasized when Porphyry prescribes the practice of vegetarianism and immaterial sacrifice for the conceptual philosopher’s preparation for the specific ‘contest’ of freeing from material concerns such as food and sacrifice and eventual transformation in to the as the priest of the Highest God.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

On Aristotelian Category of Substance. Exegetic Variations from Plotinus to Ammonius

63%
Cardullo R. L.
Peitho. Examina Antiqua
|
2014
|
vol. 5
|
issue 1
59-90
EN
One of the main difficulties that Neoplatonic commentators of Aristotle face is the different treatment that the Categories and the Metaphysics offer to the question of the substance. After describing briefly the status quaestionis ousiae in Aristotle, and after tracing the main Neoplatonic interpretations of this doctrine (from Plotinus’ negative one to Porphyry’s positive and “conciliatory” one), this article attempts to demonstrate that the Neoplatonists of Athens and Alexandria, Syrianus and Ammonius, inaugurate a new interpretation of the Aristotelian doctrine. With regard to the category of substance in general and to the question of substantiality of “immanent form” in particular, this new interpretation goes beyond the positions of Plotinus and Porphyry and returns the ontological value to the Aristotelian substances. Unlike Plotinus, who recognized as ousia only that one intelligible, that is five genres of the Platonic Sophist, and unlike Porphyry, who defused the anti–Platonic fuse of the Categories, giving to this treaty a mainly semantic skopos, these philosophers, through their original study of the theory of the three states of katholou, already shed in the Porphyrian Eisagôgê, fit the immanent forms of Aristotle, recognized as substances and as a reflection of the transcendental universal, into the late antique Neoplatonic metaphysical triadic structure.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Ostatnie dni Plotyna: pandemia i filozofia

63%
Stróżyński M.
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
|
2021
|
vol. 31
|
issue 1
285-301
EN
The traditional view of the cause of Plotinus’ death was leprosy. The analysis of the biographical sources, however, point to another hypothesis, that of „Cyprian’s plague”. The last months of Plotinus life and work coincided with the end of this great ancient pandemic and he produced four treatises, focused primarily on ethical problems. The last treatise, On the primal Good (1.7) is a short and concentrated meditation on the First Principle and the soul’s ascent to it.
6

Between Heaven and Earth: The Human Being in Porphyry’s Conception

51%
Neacşu A.
Dialogue and Universalism
|
2015
|
issue 1
45-56
EN
For Porphyry, the human being is a compound of soul, its divine and immortal part, which represents the essence of man, and body, its perishable part, that is only the im-age of the soul, its headquarters and sensitive instrument. Man can achieve happiness only by a spiritual life, according to its nature, a life free of physical needs as much as it is possible. The methods used in this sense imply the weakening of the link between mind and body. In this way the soul of man returns to the sky, meaning the sphere of God, which is its native country.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Nawrócenie św. Augustyna a jego stosunek do kultury antycznej

51%
Spychała D.
Studia Europaea Gnesnensia
|
2011
|
issue 3
227-243
PL
Augustine of Hippo was the most eminent Church theologian at the close of antiquity. His influence is perceptible until the present day. The path which led him to Christianity was typical for the period of the late Roman Empire, when various religious currents would contend. It seems that the problems of antique culture were of secondary significance in his conversion.  
8

Czy dusza ludzka jest indywidualna? Kontrowersje wokół rozumienia duszy w starożytnym neoplatonizmie niechrześcijańskim

51%
Stępień T.
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
|
2012
|
vol. 48
|
issue 1
87-104
EN
Understanding the human soul was one of the basic problems discussed by ancient philosophers. The most important issue concerning the relation of the soul to the human body was widely considered in Plato’s dialogues. Discussion of this issue arose once again among Neoplatonists during the last period of pagan philosophy. In Plotinus’ Enneads and the writings of his pupils we can observe that discussion of the nature of the soul and its relationship to body is linked to the problem of how the soul can be individual. Plotinus underlined the perfection of the soul and diminished the role of the human body and at the same time he explained the origins of intellectual reality by the theory of procession of hypostases. As a result he claimed that the primal state of the soul is hypostasis of the soul, which leads to monopsychism, which in the case of Plotinus was neither clear nor radical. It was his pupil, Amelius, who formulated the radical monopsychic idea. At the same time, the second of Plotinus’ closest pupils, Porphyry, made an attempt to reconcile the individuality of the soul with its almost absolute independence of the body. The growing influence of Aristotle and his theory of the substantial unity of the body and soul made the rejection of monopsychism possible. This influence most notable in the writings of Iamblichus, who agreed first, that connection with the body is substantial. His accordance with Aristotle was possible only thanks to theurgical rites, practiced by neoplatonic philosophers. The idea of substantial unity caused inevitable claims of the mortality of the soul united in this way with the body. Nevertheless, thanks to theurgical rites, immortality could be regained and the individual character of the human soul could be claimed without rejecting its immortality. Although monopsychism did not return in Neoplatonism, it did resurface in some form in the writings of Arabic medieval thinkers, who were well acquainted with neoplatonic commentaries on Aristotle.
PL
Zagadnienie duszy ludzkiej stanowi jeden z podstawowych problemów dyskutowanych przez starożytnych filozofów. Najważniejsze aporie dotyczyły tego, jaka jest relacja duszy do ciała i zostały po raz pierwszy wyraźnie sformułowane w dialogach Platona. Dyskusja na ten temat ożywa w ostatnim okresie istnienia filozofii pogańskiej – w nurcie neoplatońskim. Rozważania Plotyna i jego uczniów pokazują, że problem ten bardzo mocno łączy się z zagadnieniem indywidualności ludzkiej duszy. Podkreślanie doskonałości duszy i umniejszanie roli ludzkiego ciała, przy jednoczesnym wprowadzeniu pochodzenia, jako wyjaśnienia sposobu istnienia duchowego świata, doprowadziło w filozofii Plotyna do stwierdzenia, że dusza w istocie jest jedną duchową hipostazą. Pogląd ten zwany monopsychizmem jest u Plotyna jeszcze niewyraźny, jednak jego uczeń Ameliusz przedstawi go w bardziej radykalnej postaci. Jednocześnie drugi z najbliższych uczniów Plotyna – Porfiriusz podkreślając niezależność duszy od ciała, będzie szukał pogodzenia takiego twierdzenia z traktowaniem duszy na sposób indywidualny. Dokonuje się to w dużej mierze dzięki powiększaniu się wpływu filozofii Arystotelesa. Wpływ ten osiągnie swoją największą intensywność w pismach ucznia Porfiriusza – Jamblicha, który jako pierwszy pośród neoplatoników stwierdzi, że połączenie duszy z ciałem jest substancjalne. Pociąga to jednak za sobą konieczność przyznania, że dusza ludzka po przyjęciu ciała jest śmiertelna i może odzyskać swoją nieśmiertelność tylko dzięki praktykowaniu przez filozofa rytów teurgicznych. Choć w pismach neoplatoników ostatecznie zwycięża pogląd, że dusza ludzka jest indywidualna, to jednak monopsychizm w mniej radykalnej postaci powróci jeszcze w dziełach filozofów arabskich, którzy korzystali z neoplatońskich komentarzy do dzieł Arystotelesa.
9
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Oryginalność Hieroklesowego porównania Apoloniusza z Tiany z Chrystusem

51%
Tondera A.
Vox Patrum
|
2016
|
vol. 65
683-695
EN
Sossianus Hierocles, governor of Bithynia and adviser of the emperor Dio­cletian, at the beginning of the “great persecution” of the Christians published his propagandistic writing under the title The Lover of Truth, in which he drew a comparison between Apollonius of Tyana and Christ. In the apologetic treatise of Eusebius of Caesarea Against Hierocles we find a statement, that this compari­son was something new in the hitherto existing attacks of the pagan intellectuals on Christianity and demanded a polemic response from the Christian part. Mod­ern studies regarding the works of Porphyry, famous enemy of the Christians and exponent of the Neo-Platonic philosophy, seem to indicate that even before Hie­rocles the personage of Apollonius was used in the anti-Christian polemics and was confronted with Christ. The present article try to explain, what the originality of Hierocles’ comparison, testified by Eusebius, consisted in.
10
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Antyczna tradycja o Pitagorasie z Samos jako twórcy fizjonomiki

51%
Domazet R.
Studia Antiquitatis et Medii Aevi Incohantis
|
2023
|
vol. 8
27-41
EN
This paper collects and analyzes ancient sources that refer to Pythagoras of Samos as the founder of physiognomy. Interest in physiognomy, which deals with the relationship between the body and the spirit, has become more popular over the last few years; however, many aspects of research into the topic are still obscure and worthy of further study. Physiognomy was assumed by ancient authors to be the method by which candidates were selected to enter the Pythagorean community, used by the Greek philosopher and his followers. Information about Pythagoras, who – by simply looking at somebody – could recognize their character appears, in the works of Aulus Gellius, Hippolytus, Porphyry, Iamblichos, Proclos and Olympiodorus. Apart from discussing testimonia about Pythagoras and his physiognomic examinations, the text explores the role of physiognomy during the selection process for the Pythagorean community in order to provide a better understanding of elite traditions within society. The paper also supplies further insight with regards to the methodology behind physiognomical surveys, which were popular during antiquity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.