Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 13

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Powstanie Styczniowe
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
To give the rebels weapons, together worked in East Prussia Poles from Greater Poland, Mazury and Warmia , to a lesser extent Germans and especially Jews - both local as well as those from the Kingdom of Poland. In Königsberg an underground network that introduced weapons from Western countries emerged. It was founded by the trading company of the brothers Chostomski and Koronowicz. Its most active helpers were, among others the Jewish merchant Johann Sohn and the agent of the Polish National Government J. Reichstein. In the base of the insurgents in Friedrichshof, district Szczytno, teamed up with the sale of weapons mainly of Masure Robert Kosiorek and the Jew Eyssig Keller out. At the Masurian Lakes the Jew Z. Steinhirt and Masure Szarejko made a similar duet. In almost every town and in the southern Warmia Mazury there were Jewish companies that smuggled along with the Mazury and Warmia population, sometimes with the German, illegal weapons across the border into the Kingdom of Poland and Lithuania. This co-operation and mutual trust were, thanks to the time of Polish-Jewish brotherhood 1861-1862 possible. Of the 44 Jews who helped the Poles in East Prussia during the January Uprising, located just two proved to be a traitor.
EN
Veterans of the Hungarian so-called Spring of Nations (1848-1849) commanded over a dozen armed units in the January Uprising. The military art in several categories of the insurgent commanders from this background is analyzed on personal examples: a) being distinguished by successful campaigns; b) of a good level, but famous for one unaided confrontation; c) gradually gaining experience; d) being prevented by circumstances from demonstrating their full skills; e) having raised high expectations yet turning out a great disappointment. 
PL
Weterani Węgierskiej Wiosny Ludów (1848-1849) dowodzili kilkunastoma oddziałami zbrojnymi Powstania Styczniowego. Na personalnych przykładach przeanalizowano sztukę wojenną kilku kategorii insurekcyjnych dowódców z tego proweniencyjnego kręgu: a) wyróżniających się udanymi kampaniami; b) na dobrym poziomie, lecz znanych z jednego samodzielnego starcia; c) stopniowo nabywających doświadczenia; d) tych, którym okoliczności uniemożliwiły zademonstrowanie pełni umiejętności; e) budzących wielkie oczekiwania i okazujących się wielkim rozczarowaniem.
EN
The article is a part of current "anniversary" discussion dedicated to the January Uprising and its consequences, however, it is attempted to discover its less typical image, often contrary to the established, not to say stereotypical vision of the national uprising and martyrdom. In the narratives often created for the members of its own family, written in private literature (of personal document), the relation of the events associated with the rebellion often appear surprising due to their sense of humour, and colourful anecdote, showing the reactions and experiences of the insurgents (like in the memoirs of Kazimierz Zienkiewicz), and self-irony, the ability to perceive the grotesque and the pragmatism of the Siberians (as in the memoirs of Jadwiga Prendowska, Władysław Zapałowski's diary, Leon Krupecki's letters). The aim of the text is primarily to show various ways of "disarming" the tragic experience by emphasizing their exoticism and comedy, or focusing on tiny problems of everyday life, which probably – as for individuals and families – constituted psychologically effective strategy of defence.
PL
W niniejszej pracy ukazane zostały stanowiska zajmowane przez chorwacką opinię publiczną w sprawie Polaków i kwestii polskiej w czasie Powstania Styczniowego. Stanowiska te zbadano na podstawie najważniejszych zagrzebskich dzienników: „Pozor” i „Narodne novine”. „Narodne novine” i „Pozor” opowiadały się za odstąpieniem od powstania i były przeciwne niezależności Polski. Na terenie Chorwacji Właściwej istniała jednak część opinii publicznej, która nie zgadzała się z tym głównym nurtem. W „Pozorze” taki sposob myślenia, stojący w opozycji do głównego stanowiska reprezentowanego przez ten dziennik, przedstawiał pisarz August Šenoa, który popierał polską walkę o niepodległość.Focusing on the most important newspapers in Croatia in the second part of the nineteenth century „Pozor” (from January 1863 to January 1864) and „Narodne novine” (from January 1863 to December 1864), the present article examines attitude of Croatian public opinion towards the Poles and the Polish question in the time of January Uprising 1863‑1864. The article shows resignation of the uprising and objections towards autonomy of Poland as the main standpoints of „Narodne novine” and „Pozor”. No significant differences in the attitudes represented by the newspapers were found.
EN
The January Uprising was for Norwid – along with the Revolutions of 1848 (the Spring of Nations) – a sequence of historical events forming his view on politics and history. The poet’s attitude towards the last Polish insurrection in the 19th century reconstructed by researchers (Adam Krechowiecki, Wiktor Weintraub, Zofia Stefanowska, Jacek Trznadel) is full of contradictions. The article poses the question about their sources. Analysis of Norwid’s poems, letters, as well as of memorials, calendars and articles written by the above mentioned historians of literature, leads to the conclusion that the discrepancies between the interpreters’ opinions result from three factors: the changing attitude of the poet towards the events of 1861-1864 (from enthusiastic support of the Warsaw manifestations preceding the Uprising to growing doubts that were concerned with the way of conducting the struggle and the insurgents’ moral grounds); the writers’ attitude towards the subject, that was determined by the particular historical moment, in which they took up the issue; and thirdly – from the Norwidian concept of historical time.
EN
The January Uprising was for Norwid – along with the Revolutions of 1848 (the Spring of Nations) – a sequence of historical events forming his view on politics and history. The poet’s attitude towards the last Polish insurrection in the 19th century reconstructed by researchers (Adam Krechowiecki, Wiktor Weintraub, Zofia Stefanowska, Jacek Trznadel) is full of contradictions. The article poses the question about their sources. Analysis of Norwid’s poems, letters, as well as of memorials, calendars and articles written by the above mentioned historians of literature, leads to the conclusion that the discrepancies between the interpreters’ opinions result from three factors: the changing attitude of the poet towards the events of 1861-1864 (from enthusiastic support of the Warsaw manifestations preceding the Uprising to growing doubts that were concerned with the way of conducting the struggle and the insurgents’ moral grounds); the writers’ attitude towards the subject, that was determined by the particular historical moment, in which they took up the issue; and thirdly – from the Norwidian concept of historical time.
EN
The aim of this article is to reconstruct the genealogy of the Puchala family branch related to the Lublin Region. The Puchalas came from Mazovia and the first member of this family who formed ties with the Lublin Region through marriage and purchase of land was Jozef Puchala. This figure is stoill relatively poorly known despite of being "inter alia" the chairman of the Civil Tribunal of the Lublin department and the senator - castellan in the Kingdom of Poland. The analysis of this family's history allows to think that its members were coscious participants of polotical as well as social and economic life in Poland in the period after the Partitions. Public activity and patriotic attitude during insurrections prove the high moral and intellectual merots of the family members. They married with members of well known and respected families in the Lublin Region: the Suchodolskis, the Wybranowskis, the Szlubowskis, the Rulikowskis which indicated their growing prestige and positions among the manor nobility
EN
The article is concerned with Norwid’s critical opinions connected with the January Uprising. The period preceding it, abounding in great patriotic-religious demonstrations in Warsaw, was considered by the poet as a very positive and by all means original one. On the other hand, he thought that the very uprising and its course was a secondary act, devoid of logic and aim. The author of Fulminant repeated his judgments, sometimes harsh ones, in the memorials, letters and poetical works that he wrote at that time. His critical opinions of the low level of the insurrectionist press, or the unwilling participation of the Polish intelligentsia in the insurrectionist actions, were not always just and true. In many cases Norwid simply did not accept historical facts. Maybe it was his personal traumas of an underestimated, or even rejected poet, that were voiced in this way. The attitude of a prophet shouting in the wilderness was a temptation that was difficult to resist. The awareness of his own mission, the imperative that he should proclaim the truth, encouraged Norwid to assume uncompromising stances. He tried to render the position of alienation, or even of rejection by referring to Sophocles’ legendary figure, Philoctetes, bit by a venomous snake and left by the Greeks on the island of Lemnos. The writer’s numerous press articles written in the period of the Uprising will be those magic, but unable to reach the target, arrows shot by Philoctetes.
EN
The article gives a selection of sources showing the consequences of the attempt on the life of Viceroy Berg conducted in Warsaw on 19 September 1863. Apart from the reports in the press of that time it mentions illustrations that are available, analyzes the range of the destruction and shows the official attempts to solve the problem of national mourning. In its final part it tries to interpret the category of “Perfect-fulfillment” that makes the composition and semantics of Chopin’s Piano coherent.
EN
The article is concerned with Norwid’s critical opinions connected with the January Uprising. The period preceding it, abounding in great patriotic-religious demonstrations in Warsaw, was considered by the poet as a very positive and by all means original one. On the other hand, he thought that the very uprising and its course was a secondary act, devoid of logic and aim. The author of Fulminant repeated his judgments, sometimes harsh ones, in the memorials, letters and poetical works that he wrote at that time. His critical opinions of the low level of the insurrectionist press, or the unwilling participation of the Polish intelligentsia in the insurrectionist actions, were not always just and true. In many cases Norwid simply did not accept historical facts. Maybe it was his personal traumas of an underestimated, or even rejected poet, that were voiced in this way. The attitude of a prophet shouting in the wilderness was a temptation that was difficult to resist. The awareness of his own mission, the imperative that he should proclaim the truth, encouraged Norwid to assume uncompromising stances. He tried to render the position of alienation, or even of rejection by referring to Sophocles’  legendary figure, Philoctetes, bit by a venomous snake and left by the Greeks on the island of Lemnos. The writer’s numerous press articles written in the period of the Uprising will be those magic, but unable to reach the target, arrows shot by Philoctetes.
12
51%
PL
The article gives a selection of sources showing the consequences of the attempt on the life of Viceroy Berg conducted in Warsaw on 19 September 1863. Apart from the reports in the press of that time it mentions illustrations that are available, analyzes the range of the destruction and shows the official attempts to solve the problem of national mourning. In its final part it tries to interpret the category of “Perfect-fulfillment” that makes the composition and semantics of Chopin’s Piano coherent.
EN
Across one hundred years of bilateral diplomatic relations between Poland and the United States, America has posted 31 ambassadors to Poland (Jones, 2011, p. 153). In this context it is worth emphasizing the rich contribution of the first American Minister to Poland, appointed in 1919, Hugh Gibson. Amid inauspicious circumstances of the interwar period, Gibson managed to give full assistance to the new Polish government and forge a successful cooperation between allied countries. Gibson's accomplishments and recognition, however, would not have been as effective without his great supporters and collaborators: Ignacy Paderewski and Herbert Hoover. The present thesis aims to provide a historical context of Polish-American relations prior to the first, official diplomatic assignment as well as Gibson's prominent role in shaping Poland's security and credibility in the international arena.
PL
W ciągu stu lat dwustronnych stosunków dyplomatycznych pomiędzy Polską a Stanami Zjednoczonymi Ameryki Północnej, wysłano do Polski 31 ambasadorów (Jones, 2011, p. 153). W kontekście tym warto podkreślić ogromny wpływ pierwszego amerykańskiego ministra w Polsce, nominowanego w 1919r. Hugh Gibsona. W niesprzyjających okolicznościach okresu międzywojennego Gibsonowi udało się w pełni wesprzeć nowy polski rząd oraz nawiązać udaną współpracę pomiędzy sprzymierzonymi krajami. Jednakże dokonania i uznanie Gibsona nie byłyby tak skuteczne, gdyby nie pomoc jego zwolenników oraz współpracowników: Ignacego Paderewskiego i Herberta Hoovera. Celem niniejszej pracy jest ukazanie historycznego kontekstu stosunków polsko – amerykańskich przed pierwszym oficjalnym przydzieleniem zadań dyplomatycznych jak również wybitnej roli Gibsona w kształtowaniu bezpieczeństwa i wiarygodności Polski na arenie międzynarodowej.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.