Search results

1

Estetyka w prawie budowlanym

100%

Zwolak S.

Administracja Teoria Dydaktyka Praktyka

|

2014

|

issue 3(36)

141-152

EN

This article presents the question of aesthetics of buildings and the protection of the Polish law. Issues to maintain proper appearance of buildings, was already visible in the legislation of the former period. An important example of major providers as aesthetics, it was in the history of Polish law, the principle of the external appearance of buildings in the Regulation of 1928. In the current legal system, sources of aesthetics of buildings could be found in the provisions of the Constitution. The main core of the provisions relating to the aesthetics of buildings is included in the Law Building. The analysis of construction law shows that aesthetics is a key element of axiology the design, construction and maintenance of buildings. The legislature is in favor of protecting aesthetics, regulating directly the duty to maintain in good condition the aesthetic of a building. This allows you to demonstrate the fact that the appearance of the object and its impact on the ambient is not without significance. The approach of the legislator to protect the aesthetics tends to classify it as a category of public interest.

2

REKLAMA NA ZABYTKACH

38%

Sławomirska A.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

2005

|

issue 2

75-88

EN

Advertisements accompany us in everyday life, and interfere in many spheres of our activities. They appear in means of mass communication, the Internet and on all kinds of buildings, including historic ones. The advertisements that are placed on historic buildings may be divided into two groups: permanent and temporary. Permanent advertisements (signs, neon signs, semaphores and so forth), which depict company logos, are currently an inseparable part of most historic Old Towns in Poland. Temporary advertisements, put up on historic sites during renovation periods, appear on tarpaulins that cover scaffolding. In Poland, the affixing of advertisements on registered historic sites is subject to particularly restrictive laws. This issue is regulated by a number of legal statutes, of which the most important is the statute protecting historic sites and regulating the maintenance of historic sites. The remaining statutes regarding this matter are the law from the 21st of March, 1985, regarding public roads and the law from the 7th of July, 1994, regarding building law. In the event an advertisement is hung on a registered historic site without permission, or if it is at odds with the conditions stated by law, the voivodeship’s conservator may issue a decision requiring that the historic site be returned to its previous state or that the site be reorganized within an established period of time. Independent of issuing orders, the voivodeship conservator is obliged to file a lawsuit in order to fine the party which affixed an advertisement to a historic site without permission. In practice, however, many advertisements are put up which are not in conformity with the law. Given this state of events, conservators do not manage to fulfill their duties when the binding regulations prevent quick and effective enforcement of the obligations required of the owners and users of historic sites. There are a few possibilities for fighting against advertising lawlessness. Above all, quick and unavoidable legal action is needed: in order to main consistency in the protection of historic sites, strict discipline should be upheld in ordering the immediate removal of advertisements from historic sites. Legal protection should also be extended to those historic sites which are not registered, and require that those who intend to place advertisements near historic sites receive suitable permission from conservator services. Nowadays, the sight of a historic building hung with advertisements is no surprise, though the legitimacy of this type of marketing arouses controversy, particularly in the context of large-format advertisements. Supporters of advertisements raise the point that money received from sponsors often means salvation for historic sites that are falling into ruin. Opponents are of the opinion that advertisements “disfigure” historic sites and prevent them from being viewed in their entirety. In seeking a solution to this problem, the arguments of both sides should be taken into account.

3

Legalizacja obiektu wybudowanego w warunkach samowoli budowlanej a legalizacja obiektu wybudowanego na podstawie nieważnego pozwolenia na budowę.

26%

Lasecka A.

Acta Iuris Stetinensis

|

2014

|

issue 5

PL

Warunkiem niezbędnym legalnego rozpoczęcia procesu budowlanego jest uzyskanie zgody właściwego organu administracji architektoniczno-budowlanej na realizację zaplanowanej inwestycji, wyrażonej w formie decyzji administracyjnej. Zasadą wynikającą z ustawy z dnia 7 lipca 1994r. Prawo budowlane jest to, że roboty budowlane można rozpocząć na podstawie ostatecznej decyzji o pozwoleniu na budowę. Wyjątki od tej zasady przewidują konkretne przepisy ustawy, określające katalog zamknięty obiektów budowlanych i robót budowlanych, których wykonanie co prawda nie musi poprzedzać uzyskanie pozwolenia na budowę, natomiast konieczne jest zgłoszenie zamiaru ich wykonania właściwemu organowi administracji publicznej. Rozpoczęcie, jak również prowadzenie robót budowlanych bez wymaganego prawem pozwolenia na budowę, bez dokonania zgłoszenia lub przy sprzeciwie właściwego organu, określane jest mianem „samowoli budowlanej”, która co do zasady skutkuje obowiązkiem rozbiórki obiektu wzniesionego samowolnie, chyba że inwestor spełni warunki przewidziane przez Prawo budowlane, umożliwiające jego zalegalizowanie. Niniejszy artykuł przedstawia zasady prowadzenia postępowania administracyjnego, zmierzającego do zalegalizowania samowoli budowlanej, traktuje również o sytuacji inwestora, który zrealizował inwestycję w oparciu o ostateczną decyzję o pozwoleniu na budowę, wyeliminowaną następnie z obrotu prawnego wskutek stwierdzenia jej nieważności. Uzyskanie pozwolenia na budowę przed przystąpieniem do wykonywania robot budowlanych oznacza, że inwestor dopełnił wszystkich przewidzianych prawem formalności, a więc rozpoczął budowę legalnie. Nie można zatem postawić znaku równości między nim, a inwestorem budującym od początku bez stosownego pozwolenia. Celem artykułu jest także przybliżenie zasad postępowania naprawczego, zmierzającego do doprowadzenia do stanu zgodnego z prawem robot budowlanych wykonanych na podstawie wadliwego pozwolenia na budowę.

EN

The prerequisite to initiate legally the construction process is to obtain consent of competent architecture and construction administration authorities for the implementation of the planned investment in the form of an administrative decision. The rule arising from the act dated 7 July 1994 (building law) is that the construction works may start on the basis of the final decision on a building permit. Exceptions to this rule are specified by particular provisions of the act determining the closed list of buildings and construction works the execution process of which, admittedly, does not have to be preceded by obtaining the building permit, however, it is necessary to declare the intention of constructing a building or performing the construction works to a competent public administration authority. Beginning as well as carrying out the construction works without the required by law building permit, without notifying or with the objection of a competent authority, is referred to as "illegal construction", which as a rule results in the obligation to demolish such an unpermitted building unless an investor meets the conditions provided for by the building law allowing its legalization. This article presents the principles of conducting administrative procedure aimed at legalizing illegal construction and also deals with the situation of the investor who has completed his investment on the basis of the final decision on the building permit but later on eliminated from the legal system due to the declaration of invalidity of such a decision. Obtaining the building permit prior to launching the construction works means that the investor has accomplished all the legal formalities and that is why he has begun the construction on a legal basis. Therefore, it is impossible to treat in the same way such an investor and another investor who constructs, from the beginning, without a proper permit. Furthermore, the purpose of this article is to explain the principles of recovery proceedings whose object is to bring the construction works performed on the basis of a faulty building permit into conformity with the law.

Refine search results

1 Acta Iuris Stetinensis

1 Administracja Teoria Dydaktyka Praktyka

1 Ochrona Zabytków

2 2014

1 2005

1 Lasecka A.

1 Sławomirska A.

1 Zwolak S.

Estetyka w prawie budowlanym

REKLAMA NA ZABYTKACH

Legalizacja obiektu wybudowanego w warunkach samowoli budowlanej a legalizacja obiektu wybudowanego na podstawie nieważnego pozwolenia na budowę.