Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Przerośl
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Onomastica
|
2017
|
vol. 61
|
issue 2
323-334
EN
The paper discusses a set of likely related Polish geographical names: Przerośl(e) ~ Przyrośl(e). It is assumed that a topographic appellative, based evidently on the participle *perorslъ ʽovergrown’ underlies most of them, but the existing reconstructions of the semantics of the latter cannot be regarded as satisfactory. It is shown that przerośl(a), referring to an unspecified part of a lake near contemporary Złotów, is attested directly as an appellative in a North Polish source from the beginning of the 17th century, although unfortunately in a context which does not reveal its precise meaning. As a considerable percentage of these names refer to lakes or parts thereof, a new hypothesis is put forward, according to which the basic North Slavic meaning of the term was ʽlake bay of prolonged shape’ (Northern Poland) and ʽoxbow lake’ (Southern Poland). In South Slavic, on the contrary, reflexes of the same etymological structure *perorslь have developed the specific meaning ʽspecifically shaped rock, called natural bridge’.
|
2019
|
vol. 21
|
issue 3
343-361
EN
This work concerns the contemporary area of the Suwałki region. In 1784 there were Roman Catholic parishes: Bakałarzewo, Filipów, Jeleniewo, Przerośl, Raczki, Suwałki, Wiżajny and probably Wigry (Magdalenowo). There was also part of the parish Lubowo and then Kaletnik. The main objective of this study is to answer the question of what role the oldest parishes of the region played for the inhabitants of the Polish-Lithuanian and Prussian states and their for the country's security. An attempt was made to characterize the importance of the borderland in the Christianization activity. The first permanent settlement began here at the beginning of the 16th century. The oldest Roman Catholic parish is Bakałarzewo (1520). Between 1562 and 1570, the Filipów and Przerośl parishes were established. In 1599, the Raczki parish was established. The turn of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries is also the time when the Wiżajny parish was founded. In 1541, in the village of Dowspuda near Raczki, there was also an Orthodox chapel. The Camaldolese of Wigry played a major role here (from 1668). They built temples in: Wigry, Magdalenowo and Suwałki (after 1710). Between 1772 and 1785, the Jeleniewo parish was developed, and in the years 1790-1794 – the Kaletnik parish. At that time, parish priests played a huge role, as they were able to write and read as few. Catholic churches near the border with Prussia strengthened the security of the state and the religiousness of the Catholics from Prussia. Only in churches, old people could get to know paintings or sculptures. Associations were active at the churches. The parishes supported Polish patriotism. Belfries were announced by important events, and parish cemeteries made it possible to organize funerals. Only parishes helped the poor and ran schools.
PL
Głównym celem artykułu jest przedstawienie znaczeń i sensów wiązanych w różnych dyskursach z kamieniami Suwalszczyzny. Kamień to wszechobecny element suwalskiego pejzażu, postrzegany przez turystów i innych przybyszy z zewnątrz jako jego wyjątkowy wyróżnik. Autorka próbuje sprawdzić, czy ta wyjątkowość znajduje odzwierciedlenie w sposobie myślenia mieszkańców, czy postrzegają „swoje” kamienie pozytywnie, czy negatywnie? Druga część artykułu dotyczy wizerunku regionu prezentowanego w różnego rodzaju opracowaniach, na stronach internetowych i w innych publikacjach. Porównanie tych dwóch dyskursów – codziennego i odświętnego (skierowanego celowo na zewnątrz) pozwala pełniej rozpoznać miejsce, jakie zajmują kamienie w obrazie Suwalszczyzny.
EN
The main objective of this article is to present the way in which people from the Suwalki region perceive their coexistence with rocks, which are ubiquitous in the region and constitute a kind of its trademark. The first question is: how do local people perceive rocks, and how do they assess their presence? The second important question is how the rocks ft into the image of the region, created and distributed as a tourism product? Does their history contribute to the mysteriousness of the region which permeates touristic narratives?
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.