Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Qualifying Evaluation of Nominated Auditors
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Amendments to Article 76 of the Act on the Supreme Audit Office – Periodic Qualifying Evaluation of Nominated Auditors The Act of 22nd January 2010, amending the Act on the Supreme Audit Office, limited the right of nominated auditors of the Supreme Audit Office to appeal against periodic qualifying evaluation. The article attempts to contribute to the discussion on the role of periodic qualifying evaluation of nominated auditors of the Supreme Audit Office, after the amendments to the Act. The author of the article tries to answer the question on whether, in the light of the present legal regulations, qualifying evaluation can have another role apart from nominated auditors’ preparedness to continue work at NIK, what should be the scale of evaluation, whether efforts made in the evaluation process and the engagement of several persons is indeed beneficial to NIK and has an impact on the professional development of employees, or whether it is just a mere implementation of an unwanted legal obligation.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.