Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  R.M. Hare
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

The Archangel Delusion. Descriptive Ethics and Its Role in the Education of Ethicists

100%
Kucharski J.
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
|
2021
|
vol. 57
|
issue 2
35-49
EN
The role of ethicists is to provide a genuine ethical theory to help non-ethicists interpret and solve moral dilemmas, to define what is right or wrong, and, finally, to clarify moral values. Therefore, ethicists are taught to address morality with rational procedures, to set aside their moral intuitions and emotions. Sometimes, professional ethicists are prone to falling into the archangel delusion – the belief that they are beyond the influence of their own emotions. This can lead to ousting moral intuitions from the space of ethical reflection, thus making ethicists unaware of them. They may treat intuitive beliefs about morality as an expression of primal moral feelings. The main question pursued in this article, is how those feelings may influence moral theories, which should be developed by professional ethicists. Ethicists may provide an ethical theory which is merely a rationalisation and justification for their own suppressed moral emotions, rather than the effect of genuine, rational moral reasoning. To help ethicists cope with this delusion, a model of cooperation between descriptive and normative ethics is proposed. Ethicists should therefore use the research tools of descriptive ethics to determine their own intuitions, and the moral emotions in which these intuitions are grounded. --------------- Received: 09/06/2021. Reviewed: 23/07/2021. Accepted: 13/08/2021.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Relatywistyczne aspekty utylitaryzmu Richarda M. Hare’a w świetle krytyki Richarda B. Brandta

75%
Piekarz M.
Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria
|
2016
|
issue 2
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Relatywistyczne aspekty utylitaryzmu Richarda M. Hare’a w świetle krytyki Richarda B. Brandta

63%
Piekarz M.
Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria
|
2016
|
issue 2
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.