Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  REALISM & ANTIREALISM - SEMANTICAL DEBATE
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2009
|
vol. 37
|
issue 3
89-107
EN
The debate between realism and antirealism is of crucial significance for epistemology and metaphysics. The paper discusses three recent forms of it, developed in the writings of Michael Dummett, Kit Fine, and Paul Horwich. They are presented against the traditional or standard picture of the debate. The thrust of Dummett's proposal is that the debate should be given an explicitly semantical form as the opposition between truth-conditional and justificationist theories of meaning. For Fine this attempt to resolve characteristically metaphysical issues in semantical terms is rather misguided, since the metaphysical conception of reality which is at stake here cannot be understood in fundamentally different terms. Horwich, in opposition to both Dummett and Fine, thinks that one should overcome the debate by embracing metaphilosophical quietism or deflationism. It seems that the debate at its current stage is still far from being conclusive, although its present terms are more precise than those employed in the past.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.