Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Synchrony
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The paper presents an overview of the situation of the biblical scholarship after the beginning of the 21st century. After a brief historical introduction the factors are specified that have influenced a present-day positive acceptance of the methodological pluralism. Nevertheless the keystone of the biblical interpretation remains Historical Criticism that combines a diachronic and synchronic approach to ancient texts and that in comparison with its beginning achieved certain innovations. A great expansion enjoy in our times the interpretative approaches, which are not a method in proper sense, but rather specific aspects of interest that bring a reader to understanding and to the actualization of a text. Majority of the approaches have as common denominator an intense orientation on the role of a reader in the process of interpretation. From the hermeneutical point of view is desirable to see a text as an open reality that offers ever new interpretations.
EN
This article aims to give various examples that illustrate the use of a bipolar and joint perspective – diachronic and synchronic – for the semantic study of certain items of the language. We are initially interested in the adverb carrément, which currently seems to bear little relation to any meaning as an adverb of manner. Nevertheless, the diachronic study shows how the latter stages of its development with respect to its root carré pave the way for its becoming a polyphonic adverb. It is a similar case with apparemment: it has four clear stages of semantic development, each of which is related to the various values of this adverb in synchrony. However what is perhaps even more revealing is the diachronic approach in the case of the delocutive adverbs (diablement, bigrement, fichtrement...), whereby it might be seen that these elements can have no nominal or adjectival base, which is one of the criteria that helps to illustrate their origin.
PL
Związki książki i prasy są znane badaczom od dawna. Jednak nie od początku w takim samym stopniu wykorzystywano te same formy, nie zawsze sięgano po te same gatunki dziennikarskie. Postać, rola, zadania i funkcje przekazu związanego z literaturą były zależne od wielu czynników. Pewne formy (jak na przykład recenzja) na przestrzeni wieków ulegały wyraźnym przeobrażeniom pod względem merytorycznym, wewnętrzny charakter innych (jak choćby reklam wydawniczych) zmieniał się stosunkowo niewiele, co było efektem rozmaitych czynników. Celem artykułu będzie próba odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy o formach promocji książki na łamach prasy można mówić w ujęciu diachronicznym (czy można wyodrębnić wyraźne fazy ich rozwoju w poszczególnych okresach rozwoju prasy)? Czy może jest to zjawisko przede wszystkim synchroniczne? Mamy do czynienia z pewnym równoczesnym porządkiem, tym, co się dzieje tu i teraz, czy może z przeszłością oraz zapowiedzią przyszłych stanów? A może tę problematykę należy analizować z obydwu punktów widzenia? W pierwszej części artykułu omówiono zmieniającą się funkcję i zadania prasy na przestrzeni dziejów, w drugiej prześledzono rozwój recenzji jako reprezentatywnej dla podjętego tematu formy informacji o książce, zamieszczanej na łamach gazet i czasopism.
EN
Connections between the book and the press have been known to scientists for a long time. However not from the beginning different forms were used at the same stage, not always similar journalistic types were applied. The character, role, advantages and functions of the transfer of information connected with literature were dependent on many factors. Over the centuries, some forms (like review) were clearly transformed in substantive terms, but internal character of other forms (like editorial advertising) did not change so much, which was an effect of different factors. The aim of the paper will be an attempt to answer a question – is it possible to talk about the form of book promotion in the press in diachronic terms (can you distinguish distinct phases in each period of press development)? Perhaps this is mainly a synchronic phenomenon? Maybe we are dealing with some simultaneous order, something that is going on here and now, or maybe with the past and predictions of future states? In the first part of the paper, there were discussed the changing function and tasks of the press throughout history, in the second investigated the development of the review as a representative of the subject matter of the form of book information has been reviewed, published in newspapers and magazines.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.