Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  THE NATIONAL BROADCASTING COUNCIL
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

MEDIA EDUCATION IN POLAND IN YEARS 2008 - 2011. MOST IMPORTANT INITIATIVES, MAIN PROBLEMS, PROSPECT OF EVOLUTION (Polish title below)

100%
Drzewiecki P.
Biuletyn Edukacji Medialnej
|
2011
|
issue 1
59-76
EN
(Polish title: Edukacja medialna w Polsce w latach 2008 - 2011. Najwazniejsze inicjatywy, glowne problemy, perspektywa rozwoju). The article is an analysis of major social initiatives in media education in Poland in the years 2008 - 2011 and an presentation the main problems with its promotion. The important innovation and inspiration are the new recommendations and EU directives on media education. The author discusses plans of a national strategy for media education, plans for implementation media education as a school subject of its own, shows initiative and new social media educational organizations and evaluate the new legal changes in polish law.
2
Content available remote

THE RAPORT OF THE NATIONAL BROADCASTING COUNCIL AS A FORM OF POLITICAL ACCOUNTABILITY

100%
Chrusciak R.
Przegląd Sejmowy
|
2008
|
issue 1(84)
29-44
EN
The National Broadcasting Council (KRRiT) is subject to political accountability that is enforced under specific procedure that is not applied to any other constitutional body. The procedure is initiated with a yearly report submitted to the Sejm, the Senate and the President of the Republic. The Sejm and the Senate may accept or reject the report by means of a resolution. If one, or both, of the chambers accepts the report, the proceedings is concluded. But the rejection of the report by both chambers opens the way to expiration of the term of office of the Council. However, the expiration will not take place without the approval from the President of the Republic. This means that an unanimous negative assessment of the report of the Council by the Sejm, the Senate and the President of the Republic is required to enforce political accountability of the Council in the form of expiration of its term of office. The political nature of this form of accountability results mostly from the lack of legal specification of the conditions of assessment of the report, which opens the way to application of political criteria of such assessment. Of importance is also the fact that the assessment of the report is made by bodies which are political by nature.
3

Dyskusja na kształtem krajowej rady radiofonii i telewizji w kontekście nowelizacji ustawy medialnej przez parlament VI kadencji

100%
Dziekan-Łanucha A.
Studia Socialia Cracoviensia
|
2011
|
issue 1(4)
189-202
EN
Several times the present parliament has made an effort to amend the Broadcasting Act and change regulation concerning the National Broadcasting Council. The proposal of amendments, which could modify the shape of the Council to the largest extent, was presented at the end of 2007. The change of the Broadcasting Act passed by this proposal, however, was vetoed by the President and did not come into effect. Criticizing this conception of amendment the author of the article simultaneously presents the opinions of media law experts and their interpretations of the Council position among the state organs which can show how this regulatory should be formed in the future.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.