Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  TURING TEST
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

MEASURING THE NON-COOPERATION OF PLAYERS – A LOEBNER CONTEST CASE STUDY

100%
Łupkowski P.
Homo Ludens
|
2013
|
issue 1(5)
13-22
EN
The main aim of this paper is to present a technique designed to assess the level of non-cooperativeness of players in the Loebner Contest (thereafter I will refer to the contest as LC). My tool here will be the measure of the Degrees of Non-Cooperation (DNC) in a dialogue proposed by Brian Plüss (2010, 2011). This technique is based on the identification of the set of non-cooperative features (NCFs) appearing in a given dialogue type. Plüss proposes such a set for the domain of political debates, whereas in this paper, I will propose my own set to use with the LC dialogues. In the first section I will introduce the basic rules and ideas behind the LC. The second section contains the results of an empirical study of four LC dialogues using the DNC measure: description of the study sample, types of NCFs used, a discussion of the annotation reliability and DNC measures for players are covered in this section. In the summary I will concern future applications of the presented approach.
2

NON-COOPERATIVE STRATEGIES OF PLAYERS IN THE LOEBNER CONTEST

100%
Łupkowski P., Rybacka A.
Organon F. medzinárodný časopis pre analytickú filozofiu
|
2016
|
vol. 23
|
issue 3
324 – 366
EN
In this paper the idea of Loebner contest as a practical implementation of the Turing test is presented. The Brian Plüss’ measure of the degrees of non-cooperation in a dialogue is applied to the dialogues of the Loebner contest. The proposal of a typology of non-cooperative features in the contest’s dialogues is discussed and the reliability of annotation with the use of this typology of features is analysed. The degrees of non-cooperation of judges and programs for the Loebner contest (editions 2009 – 2012) are presented and discussed. On the basis of the results the role of a judge and the strategies used by programs are discussed for the contest and the Turing test.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.