Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 9

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  Teodoret z Cyru
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
Vox Patrum
|
2001
|
vol. 40
317-335
EN
The considerations allow us to say that ancient literature (even in philosophical sphere) was important for the Church writers not only by its rhetorical function, but also by the historical one to give a full and complete view of ancient culture as well as various myths and superstitions accepted by well educated pagan groups of the late Roman Empire. The discussed questions should be more particularly analyzed using Greek-language editions and modem historical literature. The works of Theodoret can also answer other questions raised by historians.
EN
This paper presents a detailed analysis of the work of Theodoret of Cyrus, the theologian and representative of the fifth-century Antiochian exegetical school, entitled Cure of the Greek Maladies, with reference to the passages presenting the question of pagan worship and, more specifically, his [Theodoret’s] position towards it. The Antiochenian understands perfectly well that literature, culture and philosophy are the meeting point between Christianity and Hellenism. He does not explicitly reject the entire output of Greek culture, because he believes that an attempt to reconcile Christianity with Hellenism is possible, but without the participation of pagan worship. Christianity’s superiority to Hellenism must undoubtedly be granted. The author of the apologia offers the pagans a remedy to cure themselves of the disease of conceit.  Theodoret of Cyrus condemned, among other things, secret practices and bowing to statues (III, 84; III 85), rejected bloody and impious sacrifices (VII, 3; VII, 10; VII 22; VII, 24), warned not to confuse the cult of martyrs with supplication offerings to the dead for the well-being of the living (VIII, 33; VIII 34), and was critical of the Greek oracles (X, 2-3; X, 9). In order to show more fully the issue referred to in the theme, the historical and social context of the apologia are analysed and the circumstances of the formation of the author's own reason and spirituality are also discussed.
PL
W niniejszej publikacji przedstawiono szczegółową analizę dzieła Teodoreta z Cyru, teologa i egzegety greckiego z V w. pt. Leczenie chorób hellemnizmu w odniesieniu do fragmentów przedstawiających kwestię kultu pogańskiego, a konkretnie jego stanowiska względem niego. Antiocheńczyk doskonale rozumie, że literatura, kultura i filozofia są miejscem spotkania chrześcijaństwa z hellenizmem, dlatego wprost nie odrzuca całego dorobku kultury greckiej, ponieważ wierzy, że próba pojednania chrześcijaństwa z hellenizmem jest możliwa, jednak bez udziału kultu pogańskiego. Wyższość nad hellenizmem należy przyznać bez wątpienia chrześcijaństwu. Autor apologii proponuje poganom lekarstwo, aby wyleczyli się z choroby zarozumiałości.  Teodoret z Cyru potępił m.in. sekretne praktyki i kłanianie się rzeźbom (III, 84; III 85), odrzucił krwawe i bezbożne ofiary (VII, 3; VII, 10; VII 22; VII, 24), przestrzegł, aby nie mylić kultu męczenników z ofiarami błagalnymi dla zmarłych za pomyślność żyjących (VIII, 33; VIII 34) oraz krytycznie odniósł się do wyroczni greckich (X, 2-3; X, 9). W celu pełniejszego ukazania przywołanego w temacie zagadnienia, omówiono również kontekst historyczno-społeczny analizowanej apologii oraz okoliczności kształtowania się rozumu i duchowości samego autora.
EN
The present article discusses one of the most important ingredients of the Syrian ascetic diet (from the beginning of the IVth to the mid Vth century) as de­scribed by Theodoret of Cyrus in his Historia religiosa, namely lentils (fakÒj). The basis of the research is constituted by ancient and byzantine medical trea­tises composed between the Ist and the VIIth centuries by Dioscurides, Galen, Oribasiusa, Aetius of Amida and Paul of Aegina. The aim of the article is to de­scribe the role of the legume and thereby opine on compatibility or incompatibil­ity of the monastic dietetic pattern with the one described by the medical doctors. First, the authors of the study try to show the importance of lentils as food across the area of the Mediterranean. Subsequently, they proceed to sketch its dietetic characteristics developed by ancient and Byzantine medical doctors and conclude that the evaluation was not fully appreciative of the foodstuff. Thirdly, the authors come to show applications of lentils in medical procedures, since both in Antiquity as well as in Byzantium the plant was considered to be a medicine. The discussion on lentils is concluded by introducing culinary uses of lentils, which abound in medical writings. The authors also note that all the preserved rec­ipes envisage the cooking of the food, i.e. a procedure which was usually avoided by the Syrian ascetics.
Vox Patrum
|
2017
|
vol. 67
477-497
EN
“You set charity in order in me” (Song 2:4, LXX) is one of the most funda­mental biblical texts for the concept of the ordo caritatis. The Author seeks to examine how this text was read in the East and West, analysing the commen­tary of three Greek authors (Origen, Gregory of Nyssa and Theodoret of Cyrus), and three Latin authors (Augustine of Hippo, John Cassian and Apponius). There commentaries, he notes, agree with one another for the most part, and refer more or less to Origen’s exegesis of this verse. However, some differences can be noted. The Eastern Fathers, for example, hold that, in the order of charity, the criterion of merit is more important than the criterion of blood relationship; that is to say, the greater love is to be shown to those who have been born in Christ (cf. 1Cor 4:15) over those born of the flesh. Only the Eastern Fathers explore what the ordo caritatis means also in relation to one’s enemies. The Western Fathers, for their part, tend to underline the moral aspect of the ordo caritatis, insofar as upholding that order is virtue, while infringing it is sin. In this regard, a casuistic approach can occur in their commentary more frequently than in those of the Eastern Fathers. The novelty of the commentaries of the Western Fathers is also found in their reflection on the ordo caritatis within the Holy Tri­nity, as well as the manner in which they expand the embrace of this order to other categories of people: friends, fellow citizens, strangers. Some of the Western Fathers (Apponius) apply the ordo caritatis not only to people but also to works of mercy, while others (Augustine) bring out the aesthetic element in the ordo caritatis, noting that the effect of order of any kind, including the order of charity, is beauty.
Vox Patrum
|
2018
|
vol. 69
481-492
EN
The paper analyses the reports regarding money, which appear in the Historia religiosa writen by Theodoret of Cyrus. Historia religiosa, on the one hand, presents the life of the Syrian monks, and the other hand depicts the realities of everyday life of the inhabitants of the collapsed provinces of the Roman East at the turn of the fourth and fifth century. On this occasion, we also find in Historia religiosa nu­merous references to the role of money in everyday life. In the work of Theodoret money appears in several contexts: as an important element of trade on the market, as taxes, as a ransom paid for releasing captives but also as a money in welfare ac­tivities (amounts of money donated to charity). Unfortunately, in Historia religiosa, we didn’t found any information about the prices and wages. The analyzed reports, despite a certain lack of precision, are a valuable sources of knowledge. They depicts everyday life in eastern provinces, “stories” unknown to the “great history”, allow­ing for a reconstruction of social and economic history of the later Roman Empire.
Vox Patrum
|
2018
|
vol. 70
45-69
EN
The article presents a particular phase in the evolution of Christian asceticism, as exemplified by the monastic-ascetic milieu of Syrian Antioch. The writings of John Chrysostom, Theodoret of Cyprus and Libanius, which all refer to ascetic and monastic life in Antioch and its environs in the second half of the fourth century, are examined. These analyses allow us to identify three types among Antiochian ascetics. First group described included lay inhabitants of Antioch, both male and female, who endeavored to conduct a deeper spiritual life; this group included also persons practicing syneisaktism – a specific mode of ascetic life in which female virgins consecrated to God lived together with men (especially clergy) practicing ascesis. The second group consisted of rustic ascetics, to wit both lay and clergy inhabitants of villages around Antioch who conduced an ascetic lifestyle. The third group were those ascetics who observed monastic (or semi-monastic) life in the Antiochian mountains, especially on Mount Silpios. Monks were held in considerably high esteem, enjoying great respect among the inhabitants of Antioch. This resulted in their occasionally ignoring the rules of detachment from the world and of solitary life, as they entertained visitors or guests and – for serious reasons (e.g. during the trial of inhabitants of Antioch following the tax rebellion in 387) – visited the city. Our analysis thus depicts Antioch and its vicinity as a center of ascetic and monastic life. The clear-cut conclusion that emerges is that pre-monastic and monastic forms of ascetic life both existed in Antioch in the second half of the fourth century.
Vox Patrum
|
2019
|
vol. 71
155-184
EN
The article focuses on the Theodoret of Cyrrhus, a little known in the Polish Patrology Syrian Church’s Father, who in his book “Healing Hellenic Diseases” created an original apologetic method. It consisted in the presentation of reason – rational thinking as a natural way to faith, in order to convince the educated representatives of Greek culture to Christianity. Theodoret, who had classical Greek education and experience of strict monastic life in the Syrian form of asceticism was able to combine both of these realitiesto indicate Christianity as a true philosophy (fullness of knowledge) and the monk as the ideal of a philosopher. The main method of Theodoret was to evidence the rationality of Christianity by creating demands for the rationality of science. He made this by alluding to the thoughts and opinions of the authorities recognized in Greek culture. In modern time this method could become the way to convince all rational world to accept the Christian teaching and consequently to open to the fullness of the truth of being - Jesus Christ.
PL
Artykuł skupia się na mało znanym w środowisku polskim syryjskim Ojcu Kościoła Teodorecie z Cyru, który w swoim dziele Leczenie chorób hellenizmu stworzył oryginalną metodę apologetyczną. Polegała ona na przedstawieniu rozumu, racjonalnego myślenia jako naturalnej drogi do wiary, by w ten sposób przekonać do chrześcijaństwa wykształconych przedstawicieli kultury greckiej. Posiadając zarówno klasyczne greckie wykształcenie, jak i doświadczenie życia mniszego w syryjskiej formie ascezy, potrafił połączyć obie te rzeczywistości wskazując na chrześcijaństwo jako prawdziwą filozofię (pełnię poznania) oraz na micha jako ideał filozofa. Główną metodą Teodoreta jest uzasadnienie racjonalności chrześcijaństwa polegające na stworzeniu kryteriów rozumności nauki, zgodnie z myślą i poglądami uznanych w kulturze greckiej autorytetów. Metoda ta mogłaby stać się podstawą pod wspólne dla wszystkich chrześcijan działanie, by współczesny racjonalny świat ponownie otworzył się na pełnię prawdy bytu – Jezusa Chrystusa.
Vox Patrum
|
2014
|
vol. 62
471-492
EN
Prayer was a basic goal of the lives of Christian monks. Historia religiosa by Theodoretus of Cyrus conveys a lot of valuable information on the subject of prayer of Syrian ascetics. The bishop of Cyrus used the notion of prayed to refer to any kind of requests and begging or thanksgiving and admiration. Theodoretus recorded particularly numerous examples of recoveries, which occurred by dint of intercessive prayer of ascetics. Monks prayed at different times of a day and in various postures (standing, lying or kneeling), they were also familiar with many kinds of prayer and addressed God with varied intentions. Historia religiosa in­forms us as well about gestures that accompanied prayers, such as bows, raising arms and eyes to the sky and places where it could be said. An important issue discussed by Theodoretus was the time of praying. In Historia religiosa we can find references to the ideal of incessant prayer and to morning and evening prayers typical for Christians. The aim of prayer was to help ascetics control their bodily needs, it drew the mind of an ascetic towards God, tearing them, at the same time, from worldly issues. Prayer was also a reflection of monk’s faith, since through it, they worshipped God, referred to him their requests and thanksgiving.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.