Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  VERSAILLES SYSTEM
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The Versailles Order, created after the World War I is still in the center of controversial problems of the history of the 20th–century. In the interwar years (1919-1939) it was regarded as the 'Clemenceau peace' (la Paix de Clemencau) signifying the French attempt for European domination which was contested by the British Government. In his famous The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919) John Maynard Keynes wrote on 'the Carthaginian Peace'. German propaganda operated with the term 'Versailler Diktat' repeating the thesis on 'imposed' and unjust peace. For many historians this international system could have not survive due to its internal contradictions and too rigorous conditions introduced against Germany. American political scientist Arnold Wolfers considered that any solid peace foundations could not have been based because of 'conflicting strategies' of France and the United Kingdom. In historiography there are many contradictory interpretations of the origins of World War II. For the dominant current of post–war German historiography there is no doubts that the war was precipitated by Hitler. In Germany The formula of 'die Entfesselung des zweiten Welkrieg' is in use from 1945. The most controversial problem is connected with Stalin's foreign policy. Many historians argued that Stalin's role in the genesis of War was decisive. The works of Phillip Fabry, Andreas Hillgruber and Ernst Topitsch exposed this point of view. The Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact of August 23, 1939 was always considered by them as a 'conditio sine qua non' of starting of World War II. Visibly different view was proposed by British historian Alan J. P. Taylor, who in his Origins of the Second World War argued that the war was provoked by the British 'guarantees policy' and especially by the guarantee offer to Poland of March 31, 1939. For the Soviet historiography there are two major causes of the war. First of them was the Western Powers appeasement policy and the second one: Hitler's policy of aggressions. The Soviet historiography condemned the Polish Government for it's anti–Soviet policy which decided on the impossibility of 'the Great Coalition' against the Third Reich in 1939. Poland refused to permit the Soviet Army to across Polish territory in case of war. As we know this motive was used by the Soviet Government to break the Moscow negotiations with the Western Powers in August 1939. In the present Russian post–Soviet historiography these motives are still functioning because there was no consequent breaking off with the Soviet past in Russian historiography.
EN
The postulate to modify the Versailles system and weaken the terms the peace treaty imposed on Germany was put forward almost immediately after its ratification also in the victorious camp (Great Britain). In the face of a collapse of the policy of an unrelenting execution from Germany of the terms of the Versailles treaty, France launched an attempt to find new solutions, which culminated in the conference at Locarno. The Locarno Treaties significantly strengthened the position of Germany, paving the way to its inevitable return to the role of a power. On the other hand, however, the chances of implementing the German program of revision of its border with Poland turned out to be slim. It seems therefore that fears expressed on this occasion in Warsaw were exaggerated.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.