Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  active neutrality
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article aims to present the Polish-Ukrainian relations in the context of NATO in the Polish press in the years 1993-2005, with particular emphasis on newspapers: „Gazeta Wyborcza” and „Rzeczpospolita”. Newspapers mentioned above show an interesting issue at various levels. First of all, they focus on the position of Ukraine, Russia, Polish and USA, as well as refer to series of events which had direct influence on creation Ukraine politics as regards to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (internal situation, foreign policy, presidential election, Ukrainian society attitude to NATO, arms sales to Iraq). A drawback of these publications is largely restricted to giving short, concise information and deviation of analysis attempt. That’s why majority of articles - especially in „Gazeta Wyborcza” - exemplify relations of foreign correspondents, which are in European capitals and Washington. In turn, the positive site of showing Ukrainian way to NATO are interviews with politicians, not only representing their Polish or Ukrainian political scene, but also with Zbigniew Brzezinski, Vyacheslav Czornowił or Vaclav Havel’s article.
EN
The representatives of Turkey‘s foreign policy and decision makers witnessing deadly results of the First World War, keenly evaded to follow adventurous policies applying an active neutral foreign policy practice in the course of the Second World War. Ankara preferred to apply a realist, non-adventurist outlook as well as it applied all possible diplomatic methods in order to protect itself from the destructive eff ects of the War. However, principally toward the end of the War, because of pressures by Alliance powers and not to have a disadvantageous position at the post-War era it cut its relations with Germany and Japan declaring war against Berlin and Tokyo.
PL
Przedstawiciele tureckiej polityki zagranicznej i decydenci, będący świadkami tragicznych wyników Pierwszej Wojny Światowej, byli żywo zainteresowani tym, by uniknąć prowadzenia awanturniczej polityki, stosując w trakcie Drugiej Wojny Światowej praktykę aktywnej polityki zagranicznej prowadzonej z pozycji neutralności. Ankara wolała się trzymać realistycznej, nieryzykownej perspektywy, jak również stosowała wszelkie możliwe metody dyplomatyczne w celu zabezpieczenia się przed niszczących skutków wojny. Z drugiej strony, w zasadzie pod koniec wojny, z powodu nacisku Państw Sprzymierzonych i nie chcąc zajmować niekorzystnej pozycji w epoce powojennej, zerwała swe stosunki z Niemcami i Japonią, wypowiadając wojnę Berlinowi i Tokio.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.